신문의 ‘보도기사’와 ‘사설’에 쓰인 영어 관계대명사의 담화기능 비교
Comparison of the Discourse Function of English Relative Pronouns Used in ‘News Report’ and ‘Editorial’ of Newspaper
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of this study is to compare the discourse function of English relative pronouns used in ‘news report’ and ‘editorial’ of newspaper. It is assumed that these different registers in newspaper deliver different purpose of discourse respectively. Therefore, it is possible to hypothesize that relative pronouns appearing in newspaper can show different discourse function depending on its discourse purpose. To get this goal, 266 relative pronouns in ‘news report’ and 265 relative pronouns in ‘editorial’ were collected. They are also classified by the types of OS, OO, SS, SO and by restrictive or non-restrictive usage in order to identify discourse functions. The results showed that both ‘news report’ and ‘editorial’ have common characteristics such as the preference of 4 types of relative pronoun and more dominant using of restrictive usage. It is because cognitive language processing ability and discourse functions are applied in most of our language registers. The findings of the study also indicate that different preference of certain type of relative pronouns between ‘news report’ and ‘editorial’ is derived from realizing distinctive discourse purpose. The findings in this study are believed to improve our understanding on specific relative pronouns used in order to reflect discourse functions in accordance with discourse purpose.
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to compare the discourse function of English relative pronouns used in ‘news report’ and ‘editorial’ of newspaper. It is assumed that these different registers in newspaper deliver different purpose of discourse respectively. Therefore, it is possible to hypothesize that relative pronouns appearing in newspaper can show different discourse function depending on its discourse purpose. To get this goal, 266 relative pronouns in ‘news report’ and 265 relative pronouns in ‘editorial’ were collected. They are also classified by the types of OS, OO, SS, SO and by restrictive or non-restrictive usage in order to identify discourse functions. The results showed that both ‘news report’ and ‘editorial’ have common characteristics such as the preference of 4 types of relative pronoun and more dominant using of restrictive usage. It is because cognitive language processing ability and discourse functions are applied in most of our language registers. The findings of the study also indicate that different preference of certain type of relative pronouns between ‘news report’ and ‘editorial’ is derived from realizing distinctive discourse purpose. The findings in this study are believed to improve our understanding on specific relative pronouns used in order to reflect discourse functions in accordance with discourse purpose.
참고문헌 (19)
- 김경열, "A Cognitive-Functional Account for Relative Clauses in Discourse", 영어영문학연구, 53(2), pp.15~31 (2011), 한국중앙영어영문학회
- 서석룡, "Shakespeare영어의 관계절 문법의 담화적 설명", 경성대학교논문집, 14(1), pp.39~52 (1993)
- 이원표, "신문에서의 새로운 장르, ‘뉴스분석’: 언어 및 담화적 실현과 혼합적 성격", 담화와 인지, 16(3), pp.129~170 (2009), 담화·인지언어학회
- 황신자주, "The Relative Clause in Narrative Discourse", 어학 연구, 26(2), pp.373~400 (1990)
- Biber, D., "Corpus-Based Approaches to Issues in Applied Linguistics", Applied Linguistics, 15(2), pp.169~189 (1994)
- 조동완, "A corpus-based study on the frequency and usage of English relative clauses in two science journals", Foreign Languages Education, 16(3), pp.1~20 (2009), 한국외국어교육학회
- De Haan, P, "Postmodifying Clauses in the English Noun Phrase: A Corpus-Based Study" (1989), Rodopi
- Downing, A, "English Grammar" (2006), Routledge
- Fox, B. A, "A Discourse Explanation of the Grammar of Relative Clauses", Language, 66(2), pp.297~316 (1990)
- Hamilton, R., "Is implicational generalization unidirectional and maximal? Evidence from relativization instruction in a second language", Language Learning, 44, pp.123~157 (1994)
- Ioup, G, "On TESOL 77: Teaching and Learning English as a Second Language: Trends in Research and Practice" (1977), TESOL
- Keenan, E. L, "Noun Phrase Accessibility and Universal Grammar", Linguistic Inquiry, 8(1), pp.63~99 (1977)
- Kuno, S., "The Position of Relative Clauses and Conjunctions", Linguistic Inquiry, 5, pp.117~136 (1974)
- Mak, W. M, "The Influence of Animacy on Relative Clause Processing", Memory and Language, 47, pp.50~68 (2002)
- Mak, W. M, "Discourse Structure and Relative Clause Processing", Memory & Cognition, 36(1), pp.170~181 (2008)
- Olofsson, A., "Relative Junctions in Written American English" (1981), Acta universitatis Gothoburgensis
- Schumann, J, "Research in Second Language Acquisition" (1980), Newbury House
- Stauble, A, "A frequency study of restrictive relative clause types and relative pronoun usage in English", 박사, pp.1978
- Vestergaard, Torben, "Analysing professional genres", pp.97~113 (2000), Benjamins