영어와 한국어 관계절의 의미와 접속 관계 연구
A Study on the Nexus and Meanings of Relative Clauses in English and Korean
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper explores the co-relations and differences in English and Korean relative clauses from the Role and Reference Grammar[RRG] perspective. The relatives in two languages are divided into gap-based(or syntax-based) and characterization-based(or semantic and pragmatics-based) relatives. In this paper the followings are discussed. First, the gap-based relatives in English are so called relative clauses, while the characterization-based relatives are non-restrictive relatives. Second, the restrictive relative clauses in English serve to identify the intersection of sets for relative clauses and head nouns, and so the type of the nexus is regarded as the NP subordination. On the other hand, nonrestricitve relatives in English are argued to take the nexus of cosubordination. In Korean, however, the gap-based relatives are argued to be externally headed relative clauses, while characterization-based relatives are argued to be internally headed relative clauses and gapless relatives. The type of the nexus in Korean externally headed relatives is classed as the subordination, which provide characterization for the antecedent. On the other hand, the type of the nexus for internally headed relatives and gapless relatives could be the cosubordination
Abstract
This paper explores the co-relations and differences in English and Korean relative clauses from the Role and Reference Grammar[RRG] perspective. The relatives in two languages are divided into gap-based(or syntax-based) and characterization-based(or semantic and pragmatics-based) relatives. In this paper the followings are discussed. First, the gap-based relatives in English are so called relative clauses, while the characterization-based relatives are non-restrictive relatives. Second, the restrictive relative clauses in English serve to identify the intersection of sets for relative clauses and head nouns, and so the type of the nexus is regarded as the NP subordination. On the other hand, nonrestricitve relatives in English are argued to take the nexus of cosubordination. In Korean, however, the gap-based relatives are argued to be externally headed relative clauses, while characterization-based relatives are argued to be internally headed relative clauses and gapless relatives. The type of the nexus in Korean externally headed relatives is classed as the subordination, which provide characterization for the antecedent. On the other hand, the type of the nexus for internally headed relatives and gapless relatives could be the cosubordination
참고문헌 (23)
- 연재훈, "유형론적 관점의 한국어 관계절 연구", 國語學, (63), pp.413~457 (2012), 국어학회[DOI]
- 윤재학, "제한과 서술개념에 기초한 유사관계절 분석", 담화와 인지, 11(3), pp.107~130 (2004), 담화·인지언어학회
- 홍용철, "한국어의 사건 관계절과 상태 관계절의 어순, 그리고 특정성 조건", 생성문법연구, 22(2), pp.417~435 (2012), 한국생성문법학회[DOI]
- 채희락, "한국어에 과연 관계절이 존재 하는가: 분사절 분석", 언어, 37(4), pp.1043~1065 (2012), 한국언어학회
- Castillo, C, "The Difference between Restrictive and Non-restrictive Relative Clauses", Atlantis, 25(2), pp.25~38 (2003)
- Cinque, G, "Empirical Issues in Syntax and Semantics 7", pp.99~137 (2008), Oxpord University Press
- Culy, C., "Syntax and Semantics of Internallly Headed Relative Clauses", 박사, pp.1990
- De Vries, M, "The Syntax of Appositive Relativization: On Specifying Coordiantion, False Free Relatives and Promotion", Linguistic Inquiry, 37, pp.229~270 (2006)
- Dryer, M., "The World Atlas of Language Structures", pp.366~369 (2005), Oxford University Press
- Fabb, N, "The Difference between English Restrictive and Non-restrictive Relative Clause", Journal of Linguistics, 26, pp.57~77 (1990)
- Jeon, K., "Development of Relativization in Korean as a Foreign Language", Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 29, pp.253~276 (2007)
- Jespersen, O., "A Modern English Grammar on Historical Principles. Part III" (1949), Allen and Unwin Ltd
- Jhang, S., "Headed Nominalizations in Korean: Relative Clauses, Clefts, and Comparatives", 박사, pp.1994
- Keenan, E., "Noun Phrase Accessibility and Universal Grammar", Linguistic Inquiry, 8, pp.63~99 (1977)
- Kim, I, "Rethinking "Island Effects" in Korean Relativization", Language Sciences, 38, pp.59~82 (2013)
- Kim, M., "Event-Structure and the Internally-Headed Relative Clause Construction in Korean and Japanese", 박사, pp.2004
- Kim, J., "On the Mixed Properties of Pseudo Relative Clause Constructions", ICKL Proceedings, pp.83~93 (1998)
- 권종일, "The Syntactic Status of Kes in Korean Head-internal Relative Clauses", 영어영문학연구, 52(2), pp.25~43 (2010), 한국중앙영어영문학회
- Peterson, P, "Non-restrictive Relatives and Other Non-syntagmatic Relations in a Lexical-Functional Framework", Proceedings of LFG 2004 Conference, pp.391~397 (2004), CSLI Publications
- Shin, H., "The Syntax and Semantics of Korean Relative Clause Constructions", 박사, pp.1996
- Van Vlin, R., "Some Issues in the Linking between Syntax and Semantics in Relative Clauses. ms. Heinrich-Heine University Dusseldorf", 석사, pp.2010
- Van Valin, R., "Syntax: Structure, Meaning, and Function" (1997), Cambridge University Press
- Yoon, J, "The Semantics for Relative Clauses in Korean", Japanese and Korean Linguistics, 4, pp.413~428 (1994)