본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

영어 관계사 변이 요인의 코퍼스 기반 연구

A Corpus-based Study on the Factors of English Relativizer Variation

2

조회

0

다운로드

6

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류언어학

초록

The purpose of this study is to identify the factors that influence the choice between English relativizers which and that. This is a new approach to the presence/absence of relativizers in English relative constructions. Based on spoken and written data of modern American English from Corpus of Contemporary American English, three kinds of relative clauses, subject relative clauses, object relative clauses, and passive relative clauses, containing which and that were examined to investigate the overt relativizer variation. The corpus analyses show that structure of subjects in object relative clauses, antecedents in subject/object relative clauses and verb types in passive relative clauses can affect the choice between which and that. However, results suggest that the length of the Head NP in object relative clauses may not affect the relativizer variation

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to identify the factors that influence the choice between English relativizers which and that. This is a new approach to the presence/absence of relativizers in English relative constructions. Based on spoken and written data of modern American English from Corpus of Contemporary American English, three kinds of relative clauses, subject relative clauses, object relative clauses, and passive relative clauses, containing which and that were examined to investigate the overt relativizer variation. The corpus analyses show that structure of subjects in object relative clauses, antecedents in subject/object relative clauses and verb types in passive relative clauses can affect the choice between which and that. However, results suggest that the length of the Head NP in object relative clauses may not affect the relativizer variation

참고문헌 (25)

  1. 안동환, "영어의 주절현상 및 조건절 도출에 관한 소고", 언어과학, 20(4), pp.79~98 (2013), 한국언어과학회
  2. 안동환, "영어 접촉절의 통사적 특성과 구조에 관한 연구", 언어과학, 21(1), pp.109~130 (2014), 한국언어과학회
  3. Adamson, D, "Social and Processing Constraints on Relative Clauses", American Speech, 67(2), pp.123~133 (1992)
  4. Belletti, A., "Functional Structure from Top to Toe" (2009), Oxford University Press
  5. Bianchi, V, "The Raising Analysis of Relative Clauses: A Reply to Borsley", Linguistic Inquiry, 31(1), pp.123~140 (2000)
  6. Bybee, J., "Three Frequency Effects in Syntax", Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 23(1), pp.378~388 (1997)
  7. Carnie, A., "Syntax: A Generative Introduction" (2013), Wiley-Blackwell
  8. Díaz Pérez, F., "Relative Connectives in Present-Day English: A Corpus-Based Analysis", A Journal of English and American Studies, 18, pp.69~88 (1997)
  9. Fox, B, "The Noun Phrase Accessibility Hierarchy Reinterpreted: Subject Primacy or the Absolutive Hypothesis?.", Language, 63(4), pp.856~870 (1987)
  10. Fox, B., "A Discourse Explanation of the Grammar of Relative Clauses in English Conversation", Language, 66(2), pp.297~316 (1990)
  11. Fox, B., "Relative Clauses in English Conversation: Relativizers, Frequency, and the Notion of Construction", Studies in Language, 31(2), pp.293~326 (2007)
  12. Fox, B, "On Formulating Reference: An Interactional Approach to Relative Clauses in English Conversation", Papers in pragmatics, 4(1), pp.183~196 (2009)
  13. Friedmann, N., "Relativized Relatives: Type of Intervention in the Acquisition of A-bar Dependencies", Lingua, 119(1), pp.67~88 (2009)
  14. Gennari, S., "Linking Production and Comprehension Processes: The Case of Relative Clauses", Cognition, 111(1), pp.1~23 (2009)
  15. Guy, G., "On the Choice of Relative Pronouns in English", American Speech, 70(2), pp.148~162 (1995)
  16. Huddleston, R, "The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language" (2002), Cambridge University Press
  17. Kayne, R., "The Antisymmetry of Syntax" (1994), The MIT Press
  18. Kuno, S, "The Position of Relative Clauses and Conjunctions", Linguistic Inquiry, 5(1), pp.117~136 (1974)
  19. Levin, B., "English Verb Classes and Alternations: A Preliminary Investigation" (1993), University of Chicago press
  20. 문지순, "Observations and Remarks on Relative Pronoun Variation in English", 언어연구, 29(2), pp.281~297 (2012), 언어정보연구소
  21. O'Grady, W., "Syntactic Development" (1997), University of Chicago Press
  22. Radford, A., "Analysing English Sentences: A Minimalist Approach" (2009), Cambridge University Press
  23. Roland, D., "Frequency of Basic English Grammatical Structures: A Corpus Analysis", Journal of Memory and Language, 57(3), pp.348~379 (2007)
  24. Temperley, D, "Ambiguity Avoidance in English Relative Clauses", Language, 79(3), pp.464~484 (2003)
  25. Wasow, T., "Lexical Variation in Relativizer Frequency", Proceedings of the 2005 DGfS Workshop on Expecting the unexpected: Exceptions in grammar, pp.175~196 (2011), De Gruyter Mouton

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (15건)