한국과 RCEP 참여국가와의 무역구조에 관한 연구
A Study on the Trade Structure between Korea and RCEP Participating Countries
1
조회
0
다운로드
4
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose - The Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) among 16 countries including South Korea, the largest free trade agreement in the Asia-Pacific region, will be concluded next year. The participating countries decided to pursue a comprehensive and high –quality agreement, while ensuring flexibility considering development level of each country. In this study, trade structures between nations from 2005 through 2016 were examined to see the impact that this agreement will have on Korea and to come up with effective countermeasures. Research design, data, and methodology - The method of analysis includes the analysis of the trade matrix, which is useful for identifying the dependency of the individual countries on the market in the region and the reciprocal dependency of the member countries on the market, and the index of intensity of trade, which is useful for figuring out the share of trade between the parties in total trade. Results - The results showed that first, the international trade coefficients of Vietnam and Philippines are higher than those of China and Japan. Secondly, the international inducement coefficients between China and Japan were high, and that between Indonesia and Burma were low, indicating that Korea's exports did not have much effect on export increase of these countries. Third, as a result of analyzing Korea's trade intensity, it was found that export intensity and import intensity were greater than 1 in Vietnam and Philippines, which shows that there is a high degree of relational bond with these countries. India and Laos countries still have a low level of relational bond, which indicates that there is room for improvement in economic relations when the agreement is concluded. After the signing of the agreement in the future, more diverse industrial structures should be continuously studied. Conclusions - The analysis of trade matrix, trade structure, trade inducement coefficient and trade intensity between Korea and RCEP participating countries shows that the majority of the countries have the high level of economic relationship with Korea. Korea should drive a harder bargain when negotiating the terms of the RCEP, in comparison with the level of the existing FTA agreement excluding Japan.
Abstract
Purpose - The Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) among 16 countries including South Korea, the largest free trade agreement in the Asia-Pacific region, will be concluded next year. The participating countries decided to pursue a comprehensive and high –quality agreement, while ensuring flexibility considering development level of each country. In this study, trade structures between nations from 2005 through 2016 were examined to see the impact that this agreement will have on Korea and to come up with effective countermeasures. Research design, data, and methodology - The method of analysis includes the analysis of the trade matrix, which is useful for identifying the dependency of the individual countries on the market in the region and the reciprocal dependency of the member countries on the market, and the index of intensity of trade, which is useful for figuring out the share of trade between the parties in total trade. Results - The results showed that first, the international trade coefficients of Vietnam and Philippines are higher than those of China and Japan. Secondly, the international inducement coefficients between China and Japan were high, and that between Indonesia and Burma were low, indicating that Korea's exports did not have much effect on export increase of these countries. Third, as a result of analyzing Korea's trade intensity, it was found that export intensity and import intensity were greater than 1 in Vietnam and Philippines, which shows that there is a high degree of relational bond with these countries. India and Laos countries still have a low level of relational bond, which indicates that there is room for improvement in economic relations when the agreement is concluded. After the signing of the agreement in the future, more diverse industrial structures should be continuously studied. Conclusions - The analysis of trade matrix, trade structure, trade inducement coefficient and trade intensity between Korea and RCEP participating countries shows that the majority of the countries have the high level of economic relationship with Korea. Korea should drive a harder bargain when negotiating the terms of the RCEP, in comparison with the level of the existing FTA agreement excluding Japan.
참고문헌 (19)
- 정인교, "The Evaluation of East Asian Regionalism from APEC to RCEP", Journal of International Logistics and Trade, 11(1), pp.99~112 (2013), 정석물류통상연구원[DOI]
- Chen, Y. J., "Asia Pacific Regional Economic Integration : Competition vs. Conflict", Contemporary Chinese Political Economy and Strategic Relations : An International Journal, 2(1), pp.141~171 (2016)
- Chiang, M. H., "The Potential of China-Japan-South Korea Free Trade Agreement", East Asia : An International Quarterly, 30(3), pp.199~216 (2013)
- 정재완, "주요 수출입물품에 대한 RECP에서의 합리적 PSR에대한 연구", 관세학회지, 18(3), pp.57~82 (2017), 한국관세학회
- Devadason, E. S., "Framing China-Malaysia Trade Relations Beyond ASEAN : Factoring The Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership", The Journal of Developing Areas, 49(2), pp.39~56 (2015)
- Gao, Hang, "Study on Changes and Development Trends of the Trade Structure between Korea and China", Asian Journal of Business Environment, 2(1), pp.19~23 (2012), 한국유통과학회
- Hasrat Ifolala Zebua, "Determinants of Bilateral Foreign Direct Investment Intra-ASEAN : Panel Gravity Model", Asian Journal of Business Environment, 6(1), pp.19~24 (2016), 한국유통과학회
- Hsu, K., "The RCEP : Integrating India into the Asian Economy", Indian Foreign Affairs Journal, 8(1), pp.41~51 (2013)
- 강원식, "아태지역의 상보적·단일적 광역FTA 형성 가능성 : RCEP와 TPP의 수렴을 중심으로", 아태연구, 21(4), pp.5~30 (2014), 국제지역연구원[DOI]
- 김영식, "동북아시아의 역내 무역구조 분석", 대한경영학회지, 23(6), pp.3059~3081 (2010), 대한경영학회
- Nguyen Tien Dzung, "The Role of Investment Attraction in Vietnamese Industrial Parks and Economic Zones in the Process of International Economic Integration", The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 4(3), pp.27~34 (2017), 한국유통과학회
- 박희종, "한국과 FTA 추진국가간의 무역구조에 관한 연구", 국제지역연구, 11(2), pp.494~518 (2007), 국제지역학회
- 박복재, "우리나라 환경산업의 무역구조와 국제경쟁력에 관한 연구", 통상정보연구, 15(2), pp.287~306 (2013), 한국통상정보학회[DOI]
- Peter A. Petri, "The New Landscape of Trade Policy and Korea’s Choices", East Asian Economic Review, 17(4), pp.333~359 (2013), 대외경제정책연구원[DOI]
- Qazi Muhammad Adnan Hye, "The Impact of Trade Openness on Economic Growth in China: An Empirical Analysis", The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 3(3), pp.27~37 (2016), 한국유통과학회
- 심승진, "국제지역간 무역승수 효과 및 요인분해 분석", 무역학회지, 37(3), pp.195~216 (2012), 한국무역학회[DOI]
- Shon, B. H., "Economic integration" (1997), Bobmunsa Publishing
- 이재득, "동아시아국가의 국제무역승수분석", 무역학회지, 29(5), pp.5~26 (2004), 한국무역학회
- Ming-Lai Zhang, "A Study of the Impacts on Electronic Distribution Industry after Korea-China FTA", 산경연구논집, 8(6), pp.33~40 (2017), 한국유통과학회