급진민주주의적 사회정의와 입법 ―포스트 마르크스주의를 중심으로―
Radical Democratic Social Justice and Legislation ―Focusing on the Theories of Post-Marxism―
0
조회
0
다운로드
7
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Concerns about justice in Korea has increased recently. This has special meaning in the respect that these concerns are resulted from realistic politics. Generally speaking, the demand for the social justice asks for the management of law on the ground of justice. In the same line, there must be the law-making which fits for this conception of justice. As a matter of fact, many discussions about social justice are related to the legislative issues. The concerns about social justice in Korean society cannot be separated from the orders of capitalism or neo-liberalism. In this respect, we need to concentrate on the theories of Marxism, which provide the critical alternatives for these orders. This article concentrates on the Post-marxist theories among many different readings of marxist theories. Most of theorists of Post-Marxism claim for radical democracy. This article is focusing on these theme; (ⅰ) What does Marx think about the conceptions of justice? The main point of this part is whether there are ideal type of justice in the theories of Marx or not. The writer suggests that Marx criticized the ideological character of justice. And in this respect, (ⅱ) how can we explain Marx’s conceptions of justice in the perspectives on Post-Marxist? In this part, Chantal Mouffe and Ernesto Laclau are mainly explained. However, because these scholars concentrate on the political issues, their theories need to be supplied with legal and institutional aspects. Therefore, the writer introduces the theories of legal scholar, Roberto Unger. Those Scholars in these both disciplines suggest the same alternative, “radical democracy”. Finally, (ⅲ) how can the principles of legislation be constructed on the basis on the conceptions of justice within Post-Marxist alternatives, radical democracy? For this explanations, the writer introduces the analyses of Luc Wintgens, who researches in the field of Legisprudence. In his analyses, there are four principles of legislation; The Principle of Alternativity, The Principle of Normative Density, The Principle of Coherence, and The Principle of Temporality. This part mainly explains how these principles can be read in the perspectives of radical democracy.
Abstract
Concerns about justice in Korea has increased recently. This has special meaning in the respect that these concerns are resulted from realistic politics. Generally speaking, the demand for the social justice asks for the management of law on the ground of justice. In the same line, there must be the law-making which fits for this conception of justice. As a matter of fact, many discussions about social justice are related to the legislative issues. The concerns about social justice in Korean society cannot be separated from the orders of capitalism or neo-liberalism. In this respect, we need to concentrate on the theories of Marxism, which provide the critical alternatives for these orders. This article concentrates on the Post-marxist theories among many different readings of marxist theories. Most of theorists of Post-Marxism claim for radical democracy. This article is focusing on these theme; (ⅰ) What does Marx think about the conceptions of justice? The main point of this part is whether there are ideal type of justice in the theories of Marx or not. The writer suggests that Marx criticized the ideological character of justice. And in this respect, (ⅱ) how can we explain Marx’s conceptions of justice in the perspectives on Post-Marxist? In this part, Chantal Mouffe and Ernesto Laclau are mainly explained. However, because these scholars concentrate on the political issues, their theories need to be supplied with legal and institutional aspects. Therefore, the writer introduces the theories of legal scholar, Roberto Unger. Those Scholars in these both disciplines suggest the same alternative, “radical democracy”. Finally, (ⅲ) how can the principles of legislation be constructed on the basis on the conceptions of justice within Post-Marxist alternatives, radical democracy? For this explanations, the writer introduces the analyses of Luc Wintgens, who researches in the field of Legisprudence. In his analyses, there are four principles of legislation; The Principle of Alternativity, The Principle of Normative Density, The Principle of Coherence, and The Principle of Temporality. This part mainly explains how these principles can be read in the perspectives of radical democracy.
참고문헌 (59)
- Ernesto Laclau, "Metaphor and Social Antagonisms, In Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture", pp.122~ (1988), University of Illinois
- Allen W. Wood, "“Marx on Right and Justice - A Reply to Husami,” Marx, Justice, and History" (1980), Princeton Uniersity Press
- Allen W. Wood, "“The Marxian Critique of Justice,” Marx, Justice, and History" (1980), Princeton Uniersity Press
- Chantal Mouffe, "Hegemony and New Political Subjects: Toward a New Concept of Democracy, In Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture", pp.247~ (1988), University of Illinois
- Chantal Mouffe, "“Radical Democracy : Modern or Postmodern?,” Social Text, No. 21, Universal Abandon?", pp.66~ (1989), The Politics of Postmodernism
- Chantal Mouffe, "민주주의의 역설", pp.175~ (2006), 인간사랑
- Daniel Oliver-Lalana, "Legitimacy through Rationality: Parliamentary Argumentation as Rational Justification of Law, in The Theory and Practice of Legislation: Essays in Legisprudence" (2005), Ashgate
- Daniel Oliver-Lalana, "Towards a Theory of Legislative Argument", Legisprudence, 4(1) (2010)
- David M. Trubek, "Radical Theory and Programmatic Thought", The American Journal of Sociology, 95(2), pp.451~452 (1989)
- Ernesto Laclau, "Hegemony and Socialist Strategy" (1985), Verso
- Ernesto Laclau, "Metaphor and Social Antagonisms, In Marxism and the interpretation of culture", pp.270~271 (1988), University of Illinois
- Friedrich Engels, "Materialien zum Anti-Duhring", MEW, 20, pp.580~
- Gema Marcilla, "Balancing as a Guide to Legislative Reasoning", Legisprudence, 4(1) (2010)
- Gray Young, "Justice and Capitalist Production: Marx and Bourgeois Ideology", Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 8(3), pp.441~ (1978)
- H. Jose Plug, "Institutional Boundaries on the Evaluation of Argumentation in Legislative Discussions", Legisprudence, 4(1) (2010)
- Jan Sieckmann, "Legislative Argumentation and Democratic Legitimation", Legisprudence, 4(1) (2010)
- Jeremy Waldron, "Dirty Little Secret", Columbia Law Review, 98, pp.515~517 (1998)
- Karl Marx, "Zur Kritik des Gothaer Programms", MEW, 19, pp.21~22
- Karl Marx, "자본론(Ⅰ)", pp.107~ (1999), 비봉출판사
- Louis Althusser, "Ben Brewster(trans.), Lenin and Philosophy", pp.170~175 (1971), Monthly Review Press
- Luc J. Wintgens, "Legisprudence as New Theory of Legislation", Ratio Juris, 1, pp.10~ (2006)
- Luc J. Wintgens, "Legisprudence: Practical Reason in Legislation" (2011), Ashgate Publishing
- Manuel Atienza, "Reasoning and Legislation, In The Theory and Practice of Legislation: Essays in Legisprudence" (2005), Ashgate
- Nancy Holmstrom, "Exploitation", Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 7(2), pp.357~ (1977)
- Norman Geras, "The Controversy about Marx and Justice", New Left Review, 3(4), pp.47~85 (1985)
- Perry Anderson, "“Roberto Unger and the Politics of Empowerment,” A Zone of Engagement", pp.135~ (1992), Verso
- Richard J. Anderson, "What's Wrong with Exploitation", Ethics, 91, pp.213~ (1981)
- Robert C. Tucker, "“Marx and Distributive Justice,” The Marxian Revolutionary Idea" (1969), W. W. Norton and Company
- Roberto Unger, "Politics: Theory Against Fate - The Central Text", pp.VI~ (1997), Verso
- Roberto Unger, "The Critical Legal Studies Movement", Harv. L. Rev, 96 (1983)
- Roberto Unger, "False Necessity: Anti-necessitarian social theory in the service of radical democracy" (2004), Verso
- Roberto Unger, "Passion: An Essay on Personality" (1984), Free Press
- Roberto Unger, "Plasticity into Power: Comparative-historical studies on the institutional conditions of economic and military success" (2004), Verso
- Roberto Unger, "Social Theory: It's Situation and Task" (2004), Verso
- Roberto Unger, "What Should Legal Analysis Become?", pp.36~ (1996), Verso
- Roberto Unger, "근대사회에서의 법", pp.82~105 (1994), 삼영사
- Roser Hancock, "Marx's Theory of Justice", Social Theory and Practice, 1, pp.68~ (1971)
- Slavoj Zizek, "계급투쟁입니까, 포스트모더니즘입니까? 예, 부탁드립니다!, In 우연성, 헤게모니, 보편성: 좌파에 대한 현재적 대화들", pp.163~164 (2009), 도서출판b
- Vlad F. Perju, "A Comment on "Legisprudence", Boston University Law Review, 89(2) (2009)
- "What Should Legal Analysis Become?", pp.38~
- Ziyad I. Husami, "Marx on Distributive Justice", Philosophy & Public Affairs, 8(1), pp.51~ (1978)
- 김승환, "입법의 원칙", 세계헌법연구, 12(2), pp.47~68 (2006), 세계헌법학회한국학회
- 김승환, "입법학에 관한 연구:입법의 주체·원칙·기술을 중심으로", 박사, pp.1987
- 김정오, "현대 사회사상과 법: 자유주의 법체계의 운명" (2008), 나남
- 박영도, "입법학서설(Ⅰ)", 외법논집, 3 (1996)
- 박영도, "입법학서설(Ⅱ)", 외법논집, 4 (1997)
- 박영도, "입법학입문" (2008), 한국법제연구원
- 서영조, "마르크스와 정의: 논의의 쟁점과 새로운 해석의 시도", 통일논총, 9, pp.192~ (1996)
- 서원우, "행정학과 행정법학의 대화", 한국행정학보, 31(4) (1998)
- 설헌영, "분배정의와 마르크스주의", 철학, (33), pp.53~ (1990)
- 심우민, "입법절차와 절차주의: 순수절차주의에 대한 비판적 고찰과 그 대안", 박사, pp.2011
- 심우민, "제도적 상상력으로서의 법문석-Roberto Unger의 법이론을 중심으로-", 법과사회, (33), pp.221~254 (2007), 법과사회이론학회
- 이상영, "법사회학적 입법연구: 토지공개념 삼개법안 입법과정을 중심으로", 박사, pp.1993
- 이상영, "입법의 원칙에서 본 한국의 입법자와 입법과정의 분석" (2000), 입법학연구
- 정태욱, "자본주의 재산권의 법리에 관한 법철학적 상상", 민주법학, (13), pp.326~ (1997)
- 최대권, "입법의 원칙", 서울대 법학, 25(4) (1984)
- 최대권, "입법학의 의의와 목표", 입법학연구 (2000)
- 최윤철, "입법학 연구의 현황 및 전망", 입법정책, 1(1) (2007)
- 홍완식, "입법의 원칙에 관한 연구", 법제, (578) (2006)