Denken und Sein in der Hegelschen Logik. Gedanken zu Hegel, Kant und Pippin
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This essay examines the relation between thought and being in Hegel’s Logic. In my view, Hegel’s speculative logic is not just logic but also ontology: it is the study of being, as well as thought. In the course of such logic the indeterminate being, with which we begin, proves to be the realm of finite things and objects, and eventually nature, that surrounds us. In speculative logic, therefore, we do not first encounter being over against us and then somehow reach out and bring this being to mind; but we first bring indeterminate being to mind and then discover that such being itself takes the form of the world about us. This essay also examines the similarities and differences between speculative logic and pre-Kantian metaphysics and the relation between that logic and Kantian critique. It concludes with a consideration of the differences between my reading of Hegel’s Logic and that presented by Robert Pippin in his Hegel’s Idealism (1989). This section of the essay develops and also corrects some of the things I say about Pippin’s interpretation of Hegel’s Logic in my book, The Opening of Hegel’s Logic (2006).
Abstract
This essay examines the relation between thought and being in Hegel’s Logic. In my view, Hegel’s speculative logic is not just logic but also ontology: it is the study of being, as well as thought. In the course of such logic the indeterminate being, with which we begin, proves to be the realm of finite things and objects, and eventually nature, that surrounds us. In speculative logic, therefore, we do not first encounter being over against us and then somehow reach out and bring this being to mind; but we first bring indeterminate being to mind and then discover that such being itself takes the form of the world about us. This essay also examines the similarities and differences between speculative logic and pre-Kantian metaphysics and the relation between that logic and Kantian critique. It concludes with a consideration of the differences between my reading of Hegel’s Logic and that presented by Robert Pippin in his Hegel’s Idealism (1989). This section of the essay develops and also corrects some of the things I say about Pippin’s interpretation of Hegel’s Logic in my book, The Opening of Hegel’s Logic (2006).
참고문헌 (8)
- EL Hegel, G.W.F, "Werke in zwanzig Bänden, vol. 8" (1970), Suhrkamp
- LB Hegel, G.W.F, "Zweiter Band: Die subjektive Logik oder die Lehre vom Begriff" (2003), Felix Meiner
- LS Hegel, G.W.F, "Erster Teil: Die objektive Logik. Erster Band: Die Lehre vom Sein" (2008), Felix Meiner
- LW Hegel, G.W.F, "Erster Band: Die objektive Logik" (1999), Felix Meiner
- R. Schmidt, "KrV Immanuel Kant: Kritik der reinen Vernunft" (1990), Meiner
- Houlgate, Stephen, "From Being to Infinity" (2006), Purdue University Press
- Pippin, R. B, "The Transcendental Turn", pp.159~172 (2015), Oxford University Press
- HI Pippin, R. B, "Hegel’s Idealism. The Satisfactions of Self-Consciousness" (1989), Cambridge University Press