왕의 법(신 17: 14-20)의 이중적 기능
Dual Functions of the Law of Kingship in Deut 17: 14-20
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
초록
본 논문은 왕의 법을 다루는 신 17장 14-20절을 본문 자체에 대한 구조 분석적 해석과 전후문맥과의 관계를 통해 본문의 기능을 밝히려는 연구이다. 이러한 분석을 통하여 본 논문은 '왕의 법'을 다루는 텍스트가 왕에 대한 이중적 시각, 즉 왕의 권한을 제한하는 것뿐만 아니라 왕에게 최고의 통치자로서의 정당성을 부여하는 시각도 제공함을 밝힌다.
Abstract
______________________________________________________________________________ Dual Functions of the Law of Kingship in Deut 17:14-20 ______________________________________________________________________________ Seokgyu Jung, Ph.D. Professor, Department of Theology Hanyoung Theological University This paper attempts to expose the dual functions of the law of kingship in Deut 17: 14-20 by a structural analysis on the text itself and in relation to its larger contexts. In the extant form of Deut 17: 14-20, the regulation of the establishment of a king(17: 14-15) justifies the institution of kingship by the people's designation and divine approval. However, the regulations of the duties of a king(17: 16-20) explicitly function to restrict the royal prestige by mentioning a list of prohibitions imposed on the king (17: 16-17), and the torah that should be read and observed by the king(17: 18-20). Thus, the present form of Deut 17: 14-20 unveils both positive and negative perspectives on kingship. In the larger context of Deut 16: 18 - 18: 22, the law of kingship functions to restrict the monarchic power within both ancient Israel and the Ancient Near East. The regulations in Deut 16: 18 - 18: 22 demonstrate decentralization and distribution of power through limiting the power and prestige of the authorities under the torah: judges/officials(16: 18 - 17: 13), the king(17: 14-20), priests/Levites(18: 1-8), and the prophet (18: 9-22). In the larger context of Deut 16: 18 - 18: 22, thus, the law of kingship regards the king as an authority controlled under the torah actualized as the will of God. In the larger context of Deut 16: 18 - 17: 20, however, the law of kingship functions to legitimate royal administrative authority. Deut 16: 18 - 17: 20 can be regarded as a legitimate literary unit. The successive appearances of the conjunctive particle, (17: 2, 8, 14), explicitly unveil how the judicial procedure shifts from the local court (17: 2-7) to the highest centralized authority(17: 14-20) via the higher court(17: 8-13). In relation to its larger context of Deut 16: 18 - 17: 20, the negative tasks of a king(17: 16-17) postulate a new royal task to restore the divided kingdom caused by Solomon's erroneous policies by providing a counter-model against Solomon. Also, the positive tasks of a king (17:18-20) provide the monarchy with a divinely authorized legitimacy to administer the people under the torah. In the context of Deut 16: 18 - 17: 20, therefore, the law of kingship (17: 14-20) can be understood within a positive perspective on kingship.
참고문헌 (28)
- 왕대일, "다시 듣는 토라: 설교를 위한 신명기 연구" (1998), 한국 성서학 연구소
- 왕대일, "성서해석에 있어서 Intertextuality의 활용", 구약논단, 9, pp.9~38 (2000)
- 정석규, "신명기 17:14-20의 Intertextuality를 통한 해석", 구약논단, 11, pp.49~70 (2001)
- Ählstrom, G. W., "Royal Administration and National Religion in Ancient Palestine" (1982), E. J. Brill
- Braulik, G., "The Sequence of the Laws in Deuteronomy 12-26 and in the Decalogue, In A Song of Power and the Power of Song: Essays on the Book of Deuteronomy (SBTS 3)", pp.313~335 (1993), Eisenbrauns
- Carrière, Jean-Marie, "La théorie du politique dans le Deutéronome. Analyse des unités, des structures des concepts de Dt 16,18-18,22 (Österreichische biblische Studien 18)" (2001), Peter Lang
- Duke, R. K., "The Portion of the Levite: Another Reading of Deuterono- my 18:6-8", JBL, 106, pp.193~201 (1987)
- Dutcher-Walls, P., "The Circumscription of the King: Deuteronomy 17:16-17 in Its Ancient Social Context", JBL, 121, pp.601~616 (2002)
- Gerbrandt, G. E., "Kingship According to the Deuteronomistic History (SBLDS 87)" (1986), Scholars Press
- Harris, R. L., "Theological Wordbook of the Old Testament" (1980), Moody Press
- Hoppe, L. J., "Deuteronomy and Political Power", TBT, 26, pp.261~266 (1988)
- Jung, Seokgyu, "The Judicial System in Ancient Israel: A Synchronic and Diachronic Reading of Exodus 18:1-27, Deuteronomy 16:18-17:20, and 2 Chronicles 19:1-11", 박사, pp.2001
- Jung Seokgyu, "Intertextuality between the Laws of Kingship in Deut 17:14-20 and the Torat ham-Melek of the Temple Scroll", 한국기독교신학논총, (51), pp.65~80 (2007), 한국기독교학회
- Levinson, B. M., "The Reconceptualization of Kingship in Deuteronomy and the Deuteronomistic History's Transformation of Torah", VT, 51, pp.511~534 (2001)
- Lohfink, N., "Distribution of the Functions of Power: The Laws Concerning Public Offices in Deuteronomy 16:18-18:22, In A Song of Power and the Power of Song: Essays on the Book of Deuteronomy(SBTS 3)", pp.336~352 (1993), Eisenbrauns
- Mayes, A. D. H., "Deuteronomy (NCBC)" (1979), Wm. B. Eerd- mans
- McConville, J. G., "Deuteronomy (AOTC)" (2002), Apollos
- Miller, P. D., "Deuteronomy (Int.)" (1990), John Knox Press
- Nielsen, E., "Deuteronomium (HAT I.6)" (1995), J. C. B. Mohr
- O'Brien, M., "Deuteronomy 16.18-18.22: Meeting the Challenge of Towns and Nations", JSOT, 33, pp.155~172 (2008)
- Olson, D. T., "Deuteronomy and the Death of Moses: A Theological Reading" (1994), Augsburg Fortress
- Rüterswörden, U., "Von der politischen Gemeinschaft zur Gemeinde. Stu- dien zu Dtn 16,18-18,22 (BBB 65)" (1987), Atenäum
- Stulman, L., "Encroachment in Deuteronomy: An Analysis of the Social World of the D Code", JBL, 109, pp.613~632 (1990)
- Tigay, J. H., "Deuteronomy (JPS Torah Commentary)" (1996), The Jewish Publication Society
- Tucker, G. M., "Deuteronomy 18: 15-22", Interpretation, 41, pp.292~297 (1987)
- Von Rad, G., "Deuteronomy (OTL)" (1966), Westminster
- Weinfeld, M., "Judge and Officer in Ancient Israel and in Ancient Near East", Israel Oriental Studies, 7, pp.65~88 (1977)
- Welch, A. C., "The Code of Deuteronomy: A New Theory of Its Origin" (1924), Clarke