왕하 21장의 구조분석적 해석
Dual Functions of Manasseh's Sin (2 Kings 21: 1-18) in the Deuteronomistic History
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
본 논문은 므낫세의 죄를 다루는 왕하 21: 1-18을 본문 자체에 대한 구조 분석적 해석과, 신명기적 역사에 나타난 므낫세의 죄와 연관되는 다른 왕들의 죄 또는 개혁과 비교함으로 본문의 기능을 밝히려는 연구이다. 므낫세의 죄는 북이스라엘과의 관계에서 남유다에 대한 하나님의 심판이 정당하다는 것을 보여주며, 남유다의 왕들과의 관계에서는 하나님의 심판이 하나님의 자유임을 보여주는 기능을 한다.
Abstract
This is an exegetical paper on the final form of 2 Kings 21: 1-18. This paper attempts to expose the freedom of YHWH in punishing against His people as well as the theological justification for the destruction of Jerusalem by YHWH based upon Manasseh's sins as the double theological intentions of the final form of 2 Kings 21: 1-18. In order to disclose the intentions of the text, this paper examines the final form of the text by a synchronic approach rather than a diachronic approach. First, this paper analyzes the structure and texture of the final form of the texts. The extant form of 2 Kings 21: 1-18 is portrayed in the rhetorical scheme of inclusio of the typical regnal introduction(21: 1) and the concluding regnal resume(21: 17-18). In this outer framework, the main block concerning the reign of Manasseh(21: 2-16) is described in terms of a five-part concentric design as follows: a. Explanation of Manasseh's sins(21: 2-9)b. Cause for YHWH's punishment(21: 11)c. YHWH's announcement of punishment(21: 12-14)b'. Cause for YHWH's punishment(21: 15)a'. Explanation of Manasseh's additional sins(21: 16). This concentric structure shows theological function of Manasseh's sins as the cause for YHWH's punishment against Judah as well as the final form of 2 Kings 21: 1-18 as a legitimate unified literary unit. Second, this paper shows a close relationship between YHWH's punishments against Samaria and against Judah by comparing the sins of Manasseh with those of Ahab and Samaria. This relationship shows that the reference of Manasseh's sins is intended to reveal theological justification for the destruction of Jerusalem by YHWH. Third, this paper tries to expose an another function of the final form of the text by comparing Manasseh's sins with the reforms of Hezekiah and Josiah. In relation to the reforms of King Hezekiah and King Josiah of Judah, Manasseh's sins depicted in the final text of 2 Kings 21: 1-18 are intended to show YHWH's sovereignty or the freedom of God in destroying Jerusalem and Judah and reneging the eternal promise to the house of David(cf. 2 Sam 7: 12-16). The reason why Manasseh's sins, which nullify the reform of the formal king Hezekiah(2 Kings 18-20), cannot be nullified by the righteous reform of the latter king Josiah(2 Kings 22-23) is that YHWH freely made the decision to punish against Jerusalem. Therefore, the narrative of Manasseh's sins in 2 Kings 21: 1-18 functions to expose the freedom of God in punishing against His people as well as theological justification for the destruction of Judah by YHWH.
참고문헌 (32)
- 김태훈, "앗시리아 문서와 유다 왕 므낫세의 바벨론 이송", 신학과 사회, (17), pp.9~44 (2003)
- 박신배, "신명기 역사서의 제의개혁과 신학", 구약논단, 19, pp.95~113 (2005)
- 오택현, "신명기 역사에 나타난 므낫세", 신학과 목회, (31), pp.63~76 (2009)
- 이은우, "소위 신명기 역사 연구의 최근 동향", 구약논단, 14(3), pp.67~86 (2008), 한국구약학회
- 정석규, "한나의 기도(삼상 2:1-10)에 대한 구조 분석적 해석", 한영논총, (12), pp.11~36 (2008)
- 정석규, "구조로 읽는 구약성서: 구조분석의 방법과 실제" (2006), 프리칭아카데미
- 정중호, "므낫세의 종교정책에 관한 연구", 종교연구, (17), pp.213~233 (1999)
- 한동구, "신명기 개혁운동의 역사:열왕기하 16-23장 주석" (2007), 도서출판 B&A
- Ahlström,G.W, "Royal Administration and National Religion in Ancient Palestine" (1982), E. J. Brill
- Cogan, M, "Imperialism and Religion: Assyria, Judah and Israel in the Eighth and Seventh Centuries B.C.E" (1974), Scholars Press
- Cohn,Robert L, "2 Kings" (2000), The Liturgical Press
- Cross, F. M, "The Themes of the Book of Kings and the Structure of the Deuteronomistic History,” ders, Canaanite Myth and Hebrew Epic: Essays in the History of the Religion of Israel", pp.274~289 (1973), Harvard University Press
- Friedman,R.E, "The Exile and Biblical Narrative: The Formation of the Deuteronomistic and Priestly Works" (1981), Scholars Press
- Gray,J, "I & II Kings(OTL)" (1977), SCM Press
- Hobbs,T.R, "2 Kings(WBC 13)" (1985), Texas: Word Books
- Keulen,P.S.F.van, "Manasseh through the Eyes of the Deuteronomists: The Manasseh Account (2 Kings 21:1-18) & the Final Chapters of the Deuteronomistic History" (1996), E. J. Brill
- Knauf, E. A, "The Glorious Days of Manasseh", pp.164~88 (2005), T&T Clark International
- Long,B.O, "2 Kings(FOTL 10)" (1991), Wm. B. Eerdmans Pub
- McKay, J. W, "Religion in Judah under the Assyrians(SBT 26)" (1973), SCM Press
- McKenzie,St.L, "The Trouble with Kings:The Composition of the Books of Kings in the Deuteronomistic History(VTSup 42)" (1991), E. J. Brill
- Mendenhall, G. E, "Amorites", Anchor Bible Dictionary, 1, pp.199~202 (1992)
- Nelson,R.D, "The Double Redaction of the Deuteronomistic History(JSOTS 18)" (1981), JSOT Press
- Noth,M, "Überlieferungsgeschichtliche Studien" (1943), Max Niemeyer
- O'Brien,M.A, "The Deuteronomistic History Hypothesis:A Reassessment(OBO 92)" (1989), Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht
- Olyan,S.M, "Asherah and the Cult of Yahweh in Israel(SBLM 34)" (1988), Scholars Press
- Provan,I, "Hezekiah in the book of Kings(BZAW 172)" (1988), de Gruyter
- Schniedewind, W. M, "History and Interpretation: The Religion of Ahab and Manasseh in the Book of Kings", CBQ, 55, pp.649~661 (1993)
- Spieckermann,H, "Juda unter Assur in der Sargonidenzeit(FRLANT 129)" (1982), Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht
- Stavrakopoulou, F, "Good Kings and Bad Kings", pp.248~263 (2005), T&T Clark International
- Sweeney,M.A, "King Josiah of Judah: The Lost Messiah of Israel" (2001), Oxford University Press
- L. L. Grabbe, "King Manasseh of Judah and the Problem of Theodicy in the Deuteronomistic History", pp.264~278 (2005), T&T Clark International
- Taylor,J.G, "Yahweh and the sun:biblical and archaeological evidence for sun worship in ancient Israel(JSOTS 111)" (1993), JSOT Press