새 계시 논쟁으로 바라보는 다니엘서의 형성
The formation of the Book of Daniel viewed from New Revelation Dispute
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
이 글은 기원전 2세기에 새 계시 논쟁이 다니엘서의 형성과정에서 반영된 것을 검토하는 것이다. 다니엘서 7장과 8장은 입증된 다니엘의 토라에 대한 충성심에 근거하여 꿈과 환상을 받아들일 뿐 아니라, 예언서 전통을 따라 환상을 말씀으로 여기고(10-11장), 나아가서 종말의 계시를 포로 칠십년이라는 예레미야의 말씀에 종속시킨다(9장).
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to show how new revelation dispute in the 2nd c. influenced the formation of the Book of Daniel, and to examine the understanding of the dream and the vision used as the instrument of revelation in the formation of the Book of Daniel. Israelite community in the 2nd c. needed new revelation about eschatology under the persecution by Antiochus IV, the king of Greek. The contemporary apocalyptical form to contain new revelation is vision - throne vision - vision interpretation. Under the struggle between the Deuteronomistic demand not to add or subtract to the contents of the Torah, and new revelation, the Book of Daniel was formulated in the following stages, 1) The new revelation is received through the instrument of dream and vision. 2) Daniel is qualified to receive new revelation through dream and vision, since his faithfulness to the Torah is proved in Dan 1-6. 3) Dan 10-12 transformed vision into word according to prophetic tradition. 4) Furthermore, Dan 9 subjected vision about eschatology to Jeremiah’s words, exile-70-years, the word given to Jeremiah. Now vision, identical to 70 years, was interpreted as weeks. In sum, the book of Daniel presented the revelation about eschatology based on the Deuteronomistic theology by transforming apocalyptic genre. The meaning that the Book of Daniel gives to later communities is both receiving new revelation through dream and vision, and preventing new revelation by subjugating new revelation to the word. On the one hand, the demand not to add or subtract new revelation formulated the identity of Judaism. On the other hand, the Book of Daniel made possible the emergence of Christianity by showing the possibility of new revelation through dream and vision.
참고문헌 (37)
- 배정훈, "포로 칠십년의 비밀: 다니엘서 9장 연구", 신학과 문화, 13, pp.84~114 (2004)
- 배정훈, "역사 속에 나타난 하나님의 계시: 다니엘서 10-12장 연구", 신학과문화, 14, pp.43~78 (2005)
- 배정훈, "최종 본문으로 바라보는 다니엘서", 신학과 문화, 16, pp.241~266 (2007)
- 배정훈, "다니엘서: 설교를 위한 다니엘서 연구" (2007), 한국 성서학 연구소
- 배정훈, "정경해석방법으로 바라본 묵시문학: 에녹서와 다니엘서" (2008), 한국학술정보
- 배정훈, "다니엘" (2016), 장로교출판사
- 콜린스, 존 J., "묵시문학적 상상력: 유대 묵시문학 입문" (2006), 가톨릭 출판사
- Argall, Randal A., "1 Enoch and Sirach: A Comparative Literary and Conceptual Analysis of the Themes of Revelation, Creation and Judgment" (1995), Scholars Press
- Clines, David J. A., "The Dictionary of Classical Hebrew, Vol. Ⅲ" (1996), Sheffiel Academic Press
- Collins, John, J., "The Apocalyptic Vision of the Book of Daniel" (1977), Scholars Press
- Collins, John, J., "Daniel, With an Introduction to Apocalyptic Literature" (1984), Eerdmans
- Collins, John, J., "Anchor Bible Dictionary 2", pp.29~37 (1992)
- Collins, John, J., "Daniel: A Commentary on the Book of Daniel" (1993), Fortress
- Crenshaw, J. L., "Old Testament Wisdom: An Introduction" (1998), Westminster John Knox Press
- David, Pablo S., "The Composition and Structure of the Book of Daniel: A Synchronic and Diachronic Reading", pp.1992
- Ginsberg, Harold Louis, "Studies in the Book of Daniel", Texts and Studies of the Jewish Theological Seminary of America, 14 (1948), Jewish Theological Seminary of America
- Ginsberg, H. L., "The Composition of the Book of Daniel", VT, 4(3), pp.246~275 (1954)
- Ginsberg, H. L., "In Re My Studies in Daniel", JBL, 68, pp.402~407 (1949)
- Goldingay, John E., "Daniel" (1986), Word Books
- Carey, Greg, "New Interpreter's Dictionary of the Bible, vol. 5", pp.791~ (2009), Abingdon
- Hartman, L., "The Book of Daniel" (1978), Doubleday
- Heaton, E. W., "Torch Bible Commentary" (1956), SCM
- Hengel, Martin, "Judaism and Hellenism" (1974), Fortress
- Naude, Jackie A., ""hz'x'", Dictionary of Old Testament Theology & Exegesis, vol. 2", pp.56~61 (1997), Zondervan
- Lacocque, Andre, "Daniel in His Time" (1983), University of South Carolina Press
- Lacocque, Andre, "The Book of Daniel" (1979), John Knox
- Lucas, Earnest C., "Apollo Old Testament Commentary" (2002), Leicester, England
- Milik, J. T., "The Books of Enoch: Aramaic Fragments of Qumran Cave 4" (1976), Clarendon
- Porteous, Norman W., "A Commentary" (1965), Westminster Press
- Redditt, Paul L., "The New Century Bible Commentary" (1999), Sheffield Press
- Ringgren, H., "“ab'c'”, Theological Dictionary of the Old Testament, vol. XII", pp.211~215 (2003), Williams B. Eerdmans
- Rowley, H. H., "The Bilingual Problem of Daniel", ZAW, 50, pp.256~268 (1932)
- Rowley, H. H., "The Composition of the Book of Daniel: Some Comments on Professor Ginsberg's Article", VT, 5(3), pp.272~276 (1955)
- Rowley, H. H., "The Relevance of Apocalyptic" (1963), Association Press
- Russell, D. S., "The Method and Message of Jewish Apocalyptic" (1964), Westminster Press
- Seow, C. L., "Daniel" (2003), Westminster John Knox
- Slotki, Judah J., "Soncino Books of the Bible" (1985), The Socino Press