본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

포로의 신학으로 읽는 다니엘서

The Book of Daniel Reading from the View of Exile Theology

0

조회

0

다운로드

3

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류기독교신학

초록

이 연구는 다니엘서를 역사비평방법을 넘어서서 정경의 관점에서 읽도록 하기 위하여, 최종본문의 통시적인 특성을 강조하는 정경해석방법을 사용하였다. 다니엘서 1-6 장에서 다니엘은 역사적인 포로 70년을 경험하고, 단 7-12장의 공동체를 위하여 새로운 신학적인 포로를 견딜 수 있도록 예언하고 있다. 이 연구는 역사비평적인 연구물들을 교회의 눈으로 읽을 수 있도록 도울 것이다.

Abstract

______________________________________________________________________________ The Book of Daniel Reading from the View of Exile Theology ______________________________________________________________________________ Chong-Hun Pae, Ph. D. Assistant Professor, Department of Theology Presbyterian College and Theological Seminary The purpose of this article is to examine the results of historical-critical study of the Book of Daniel from the view of the canon. The historical study of the Book of Daniel reads the book for the community of the 2nd c. B. C., but is likely to regard Daniel 1-6 as artificial and having lost the message about eschatology for the Christian community today. In order to read the Book of Daniel from the view of the canon, we have to connect the subject of eschatology to the contexts of the historical situation in both the 6th century B. C. and the 2nd century B. C., moreover to that of the Christian community today. The unknown writer in the period of the Maccabees did not understand that period as the period of new revelation, but the period which Daniel's prophecy is being fulfilled. To the community in 2nd century B. C, Daniel 1-6 is not the unnecessary literature, but indispensable literature for the authority of the revelation. By showing Daniel-figure obeying to the Torah, the Book of Daniel understands him as having the authority to prophesy for the community in the 2nd c. B. C. Daniel 1-6 focuses on the four kingdoms within historical 70 years, while Daniel 7-12 focuses on four kingdoms within theological 70 weeks. From the view of the canon, the Book of Daniel is composed of two parts: in the first part, Daniel experienced exile, obeyed to the Torah, and got the ability to interpret dreams; in the second part, the qualified Daniel made a prophecy for the community to endure theological exile in the 2nd century B. C. This study challenges the Old Testament scholarship based on the historical-critical method, and suggest how to read the Book of Daniel as the canon.

참고문헌 (34)

  1. 김영진, "포로기와 포로기 이후의 신학사상", 구약논단, 21, pp.33~50 (2006)
  2. 배정훈, "다니엘서: 설교를 위한 다니엘서 연구" (2007), 한국성서학연구소
  3. 배정훈, "정경해석방법으로 바라본 묵시문학" (2008), 한국학술정보
  4. 배정훈, "다니엘서에 나타난 전승과 해석: 다니엘서 2장과 7장을 중심으로", 신학과 문화, 10, pp.55~84 (2001)
  5. 배정훈, "정경해석 방법의 이해", 신학과 문화, 9, pp.71~90 (2000)
  6. 배정훈, "포로 칠십년의 비밀: 다니엘서 9장 연구", 신학과 문화, 13, pp.84~114 (2004)
  7. 배정훈, "역사 속에 나타난 하나님의 계시: 다니엘서 10-12장 연구", 신학과 문화, 14, pp.43~78 (2005)
  8. 신학과 문화, "최종 본문으로 바라보는 다니엘서", 신학과 문화, 16, pp.241~266 (2007)
  9. 배정훈, "다니엘서에 나타난 종말: 네 왕국 사상", 신학과 문화, 18, pp.43~65 (2009)
  10. 장석정, "포로사건 경고와 땅의 개념", 구약논단, 14(4), pp.167~184 (2008), 한국구약학회
  11. Anderson, R. A., "Signs and Wonders" (1984), Eerdman
  12. Collins, J. J., "The Court Tales in Daniel and the Development of Apoca- lyptic", JBL, 94, pp.218~234 (1975)
  13. Collins, J. J., "Daniel: A Commentary on the Book of Daniel (Hermeneia)" (1993), Fortress
  14. Collins, J. J., "The Book of Daniel: Composition and Reception" (2002), Brill Academic Publisher, INC
  15. Davies, Ph. R., "Daniel Chapter Two", JTS, 27, pp.392~401 (1976)
  16. Davies, Ph. R., "Daniel" (1985), JSOT Press
  17. Davies, Ph. R., "Eschatology in the Book of Daniel, In Sects and Scrolls: Essays on Qumran and Related Topics", pp.23~44 (1996), Scholars Press
  18. Ginsberg, H. L., "Studies in the Book of Daniel, (Texts and Studies of the Jewish Theological Seminary of America 14)", Jewish Theological Seminary of America (1948)
  19. Ginsberg, H. L., "The Composition of the Book of Daniel", VT, 4(3), pp.246~275 (1954)
  20. Goldingay, J. E., "Daniel (WBC 30)" (1986), Word Books
  21. Hartman, L., "The Book of Daniel (AB 23)" (1978), Doubleday
  22. Hartman, L., "The Functions of Some So-Called Apocalyptic Timetables", NTS, 22, pp.1~14 (1974)
  23. Heaton, E. W., "The Book of Daniel (Torch Bible Commentary)" (1956), SCM
  24. Lacocque, A., "다니엘과 그 시대" (2001), 대한 기독교서회
  25. Lacocque, A., "The Book of Daniel" (1979), John Knox
  26. Lucas, E. C., "Daniel (Apollo Old Testament)" (2002), Apollos
  27. Montgomery, J. A., "Daniel (ICC)" (1927), Edinburgh
  28. Porteous, N. W., "Daniel (A Commentary)" (1965), Westminster Press
  29. Redditt, P. L., "Daniel (The New Century Bible Commentary)" (1999), Sheffield Press
  30. Rowley, H. H., "The Unity of the Book of Daniel, In The Servant of the Lord and Other Essays on the Old Testament", pp.249~280 (1952), Lutterworth
  31. Rowley, H. H., "The Composition of the Book of Daniel: Some Comments on Professor Ginsberg’s Article", 5(3), pp.272~276 (1955)
  32. Seow, C. L., "Daniel" (2003), Westminster John Knox Press
  33. Van der Woude, A. S., "The Book of Daniel: In the Light of New Findings" (1993), Leuven University Press
  34. Wills, L. M., "The Jew in the Court of the Foreign King" (1990), Fortress

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)