반려동물의 대중교통 이용 향상을 위한 법‧정책적 고찰

Abstract

The cohabitation of companion animals is already prevalent in our society; however, accompanying these animals while utilizing public transportation remains challenging. Within mobility theories centered around John Urry’s view, this phenomenon could give rise to mobility inequality between individuals who possess companion animals and those who do not. Furthermore, public transportation, as one of the public services, is an area where universal benefits are demanded. However, when it comes to using public transportation by companion animals, there is little consideration applied to this matter. Under the current laws in Korea, animals are classified as property. Regarding the use of public transportation by companion animals, it largely relies on transportation regulations. According to these regulations, the use of public transportation by companion animals is recognized very restrictively, often likened to carrying personal belongings. Additionally, animals such as large dogs are fundamentally prohibited from utilizing public transportation. On the contrary, countries like Germany, Switzerland, and Sweden have already enshrined the protection of animals in their constitutions or laws. Furthermore, these countries guarantee this status even when using public transportation. In these countries, as opposed to Korea, where facilities and locations accommodating companion animals are limited, there is a notable acceptance of a culture that involves being with animals. To enhance the utilization of public transportation by companion animals, it is imperative first to pursue An immediate revision and elimination of current transportation regulations. Furthermore, it is necessary to redefine the current enumerated definition of companion animals within the existing relevant laws, emphasizing the aspect of "companionship." An amendment of the current Civil Code that refutes the notion of animals as mere property is also requested. Meanwhile, there is a need for policies that aim to minimize conflicts with non-companion animal owners and seek peaceful coexistence, such as the establishment of dedicated companion animal compartments, setting restricted animal boarding hours, and introducing animal boarding fees.