해방10년, 보수주의문학의 역사와 논리

Abstract

This thesis aims to go to the bottom of the history and the theology of liberation decade - conservatism literature from the point of institutional history. The year, 1996 is the inflection point about understanding history before and after the liberation, which is the point of view has been changed or intersected from empirical liberation to historical liberation. That’s why the liberation decade has been set as the unit. History and argument about 8.15liberation on journalism generally have a character to introspect liberation decade history as deformed and failure liberation and try to find out the second liberation. Regarding the point of literature, the Korean Writer Association Orthodox which led literary circles after liberation with this was agitated to monopolize the history of the liberation decade literature, which made a significant difference and rapture on submitted literary history as this production. This rapture was collected as the crisis of pure literature. Liberation decade conservatism literature has been bisected with converted place as its starting point. The literary history as conversion has four meanings. First, it was the innovative point to complete literary subjugation, forcing acculturation of literary subjects institutionally. Second, it caused literary dynamic structural changes. Third, it detonated the hegemony combat of the conservative powers which have cultural leadership complicatedly. Fourth, decisively, literary core subjects which were placed after liberation were distorted and collapsed. While conservatism literature, especially Korea Writer Association Orthodox was holding the power for all the literature, this process aimed to confirm the justice and power of its literature line, pure literature. After that, the history of conservative literature was the endless continuity of building boundary and expanding the territories. Literature / non- literature, that is the way to preserve the justice of pure literature, dividing into pure literature (right literature) and non-pure literature (wrong literature). Therefore, it had created non-pure literature endlessly, which was the way to adhere to pure literature through excluding the objection.