채용 장면에서의 직업기초능력평가 문항에 대한 내용타당도 분석

Abstract

At a time when the discussion of job based HR system is becoming more important in accordance with future environmental changes, the use of objective evaluation tools based job competency is spreading in “recruitment announcement-document screening-written screening-interview screening”. Although it is an important procedure to analyze the validity of the recruitment system in that the recruitment system is operated by introducing a measurement and evaluation methodology for applicants, the validation of the Foundational Core Competency evaluation is very insufficient Therefore, through this study, the importance of the validity analysis of the NCS Foundational Core Competency assessment was recognized and the validity of the NCS Foundational Core Competency was analyzed though content validity analysis methodology. The subject of analysis of this study was 850 written questions on basic job skills of the 2022 competency-based recruitment model. For the content validity analysis, measurement and evaluation methodology experts and content experts by job group reviewed individual questions to quantitatively evaluate whether the question was related to the content to be measured. The rating scale consisted of a 4-point scale, and the questions rated at 3 or 4 were judged to have content relevance. The evaluation results were used as basic data for calculating CVI, and the level of content validity was indexed by calculating CVI for each area and job group. As a result of analyzing the relevance of the contents of each sub-domain in the basic vocational ability evaluation, the validity of the contents of the basic vocational ability evaluation was confirmed to be at a good level, and the measurement items stably included the contents to be measured. The content validity analysis used in this study has the advantage of being able to intuitively verify content relevance in that experts directly review the content of individual items to check the relevance with measurement factors, but the level of content validity is determined by the subjectivity of experts. Even though, there is also a disadvantage that objective verification is limited in that it is. unlike construct validity and criterion validity analysis that rely on statistical methodology, validity analysis by actual content experts is very meaningful.