디지털 미디어 생태계의 뉴스 소비에 관한 문헌연구: 선택적 노출과 부수적 노출의 문제
A Literature Review on News Consumption in Digital Media Ecosystems: The Concepts of Selective and Incidental Exposure
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
이 연구는 미디어 생태계 환경에 따른 이용자들의 정보 소비 행태 경향을 논의하고 있다. 특히, 레거시 미디어와 소셜 네트워크 사용에 따른 유권자의 정치적 양극화 태도를 포괄적인 문헌 검토를 통해 살펴보았다. 이 연구에서는 현재의 하이브리드(hybrid) 미디어 환경은 정보 노출 측면에서 정보 이용자가 스스로 결정을 내리는 선택적 노출과, 정보 이용자의 재량 외부에서 결정이 내려지는 즉, 알고리즘에 의한 콘텐츠 추천과 같은 사전(pre) 선택적 노출의 특성이 혼합되어 나타난다는 것을 지적한다. 소셜 네트워크의 공간은 의도적인 뉴스 콘텐츠 소비와 부수적인 노출이 공존하는 공간으로, 레거시 미디어로 이관되었을 수도 있는 정보까지도 본의 아니게 접하게 만들어 정보 획득의 기회를 확장하지만, 개인화 기술이 이용자의 이념적 양극화를 추동한다는 면에서 이중적 특성을 띈다
Abstract
This study discusses trends in users’ information consumption behavior according to the media ecosystem environment. In particular, it examines voters’ political polarization attitudes based on the use of legacy media and social networks through a comprehensive literature review. The study points out that the current hybrid media environment is characterized by a mix of selective exposure, where information users make their own decisions, and pre-selective exposure, where decisions are made outside of their discretion, such as algorithmic content recommendations. The space of social networks is where intentional consumption of news content and incidental exposure coexist, expanding opportunities for information acquisition by unintentionally exposing people to information that might otherwise be relegated to legacy media, but it is also dual in that Customized Technologies drive user polarization.
참고문헌 (78)
- 류시원, "디지털 플랫폼 시대 언론산업의 구조적 경쟁 문제에 대한 정책적 대응의 검토", 선진상사법률연구, (93), pp.59~100 (2021), 법무부
- 송석현, "미디어 플랫폼 어뷰징의 법적 문제 — 어뷰징 행위에 대한 규제를 중심으로 —", 법학연구, 29(4), pp.163~193 (2019), 법학연구원[DOI]
- 황용석, "알고리듬 기반 자동화된 의사결정의 설명 가능성에 대한 연구", 언론정보연구, 57(3), pp.41~80 (2020), 언론정보연구소[DOI]
- "AI 윤리" (2023)[URL]
- Allcott, H., "Polarization and public health : Partisan differences in social distancing during the coronavirus pandemic", Journal of public economics, pp.191~ (2020)
- Alvarado, O, "Towards algorithmic experience : Initial efforts for social media contexts", Proceedings of the 2018 chi conference on human factors in computing systems, pp.1~12 (2018)
- Bail, Christopher A., "Exposure to opposing views on social media can increase political polarization", Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(37), pp.9216~9221 (2018)
- Bergström, A., "News in social media : Incidental consumption and the role of opinion leaders", Digital journalism, 6(5), pp.583~598 (2018)
- Bode, Leticia, "Political News in the News Feed : Learning Politics from Social Media", Mass Communication and Society, 19(1), pp.24~48 (2016)
- Bos, L., "Nation binding : How public service broadcasting mitigates political selective exposure", PloS one, 11(5), pp.e0155112~ (2016)
- Boxell Levi, "Greater Internet use is not associated with faster growth in political polarization among US demographic groups", Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(40), pp.10612~10617 (2017)
- Bruns, A, "Echo chamber? What echo chamber? Reviewing the evidence", 6th Biennial Future of Journalism Conference (2017)
- Cho, J., "Do search algorithms endanger democracy? An experimental investigation of algorithm effects on political polarization", Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 64(2), pp.150~172 (2020)
- Developing Digital News Projects in Private Sector Media, "Cornia, A.", Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism, ~ (2017)
- Costera Meijer, I., "Checking, Sharing, Clicking and Linking", Digital Journalism, 3(5), pp.664~679 (2014)
- Cotton, J. L, "Selective exposure to communication", pp.11~33 (1985), Erlbaum
- Cushion, S., "Newspapers, impartiality and television news : Intermedia agenda-setting during the 2015 UK general election campaign", Journalism Studies, 19(2), pp.162~181 (2018)
- Del Vicario, M., "Mapping Social Dynamics on Facebook : The Brexit Debate", Social Networks, 50, pp.6~16 (2017)
- DellaVigna, S., "The Fox News effect : Media bias and voting", The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 122(3), pp.1187~1234 (2007)
- De Zúñiga, H. G., "How do people learn about politics when inadvertently exposed to news? Incidental news paradoxical Direct and indirect effects on political knowledge", Computers in Human Behavior, 121, pp.106803~ (2021)
- Feezell, J. T, "Agenda setting through social media : The importance of incidental news exposure and social filtering in the digital era", Political Research Quarterly, 71(2), pp.482~494 (2018)
- Festinger, L, "A theory of cognitive dissonance" (1957), Stanford University Press
- Flaxman, S., "Filter bubbles, echo chambers, and online news consumption", Public opinion quarterly, 80(S1), pp.298~320 (2016)
- Finkel, E. J., "Political sectarianism in America", Science, 370(6516), pp.533~536 (2020)
- Fletcher, R., "Polarisation and the news media in Europe" (2019), European Union
- García-Avilés, J. A., "The Routledge Companion to Digital Journalism Studies", pp.449~473 (2016), Routledge
- Garrett, R. K, "Politically motivated reinforcement seeking : Reframing the selective exposure debate", Journal of communication, 59(4), pp.676~699 (2009)
- Gentzkow, M., "Media bias and reputation", Journal of political Economy, 114(2), pp.280~316 (2006)
- Gentzkow, M., "Ideological segregation online and offline", The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 126(4), pp.1799~1839 (2011)
- Gil de Zúñiga H, "Effects of the news-finds-me perception in communication : social media use implications for news seeking and learning about politics", Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 22(3), pp.105~123 (2017)
- Giner-Sorolla, R., "The causes of hostile media judgments", Journal of ex-perimental social psychology, 30(2), pp.165~180 (1994)
- Goel, S., "The structure of online diffusion networks", Proceedings of the 13th ACM conference on electronic commerce, pp.623~638 (2012)
- Guess, A. M., "(Almost)Everything in Moderation : New Evidence on Americans’ Online Media Diets", American Journal of Political Science, 65(4), pp.1007~1022 (2021)
- Gunther, A. C., "Predicting pluralistic ignorance : The hostile media perception and its consequences", Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 78(4), pp.688~701 (2001)
- Hallin, D. C., "Ten years after comparing media systems: What have we learned?", Political Communication, 34(2), pp.155~171 (2017)
- Han, J., "News comment sections and online echo chambers : The ideological alignment between partisan news stories and their user comments", Journalism, pp.14648849211069241~ (2022)
- Ignatidou, S, "AI-driven Personalization in Digital Media : Political and Societal Implications" (2019), Chatham House
- Iyengar, S., "Red media, blue media : Evidence of ideological selectivity in media use", Journal of communication, 59(1), pp.19~39 (2009)
- Jemmer, H., "Heterodox approaches to save the day: a framework for analysing data-related innovation in legacy media businesses", Media, Culture & Society, pp.1~17 (2023)
- Jurkowitz, M., "U.S. media polarization and the 2020 election: A nation divided" (2020), Pew Research Center
- Kim, K., "When algorithmic transparency failed : controversies over algorithm-driven content curation in the South Korean digital environment", American Behavioral Scientist, 65(6), pp.847~862 (2021)
- Lazarsfeld, P. F., "The people’s choice" (1948), Columbia University Press
- Lau, R. R., "Effect of media environment diversity and advertising tone on information search, selective exposure, and affective polarization", Political Behavior, 39(1), pp.231~255 (2017)
- Lee, F. E, "How party polarization affects governance", Annual review of political science, 18, pp.261~282 (2015)
- Lee, J. K., "Incidental exposure to news : Predictors in the social media setting and effects on information gain online", Computers in human behavior, 75, pp.1008~1015 (2017)
- How Youth Navigate the News Landscape, "Madden, Mary", Knight Foundation, ~ (2017)
- Mancini, P, "Comparing Media Systems and the Digital Age", International Journal of Communication, 14, pp.5761~5774 (2020)
- Mancini, P., "Representations of corruption in the British, French, and Italian press : Audience segmentation and the lack of unanimously shared indignation", The International Journal of Press, 2017, pp.22(1), 67~91
- Mason, L, "Uncivil agreement: How politics became our identity" (2018), University of Chicago Press
- McGuire, W. J, "Theories of cognitive consistency: A sourcebook", pp.788~796 (1968), Rand McNally
- How Americans navigated the News in 2020: A Tumultuous Year in Review, "Mitchell, A.", Pew Research Center, ~ (2021)
- "The Evolving Role of News on Twitter and Facebook" (2015)[URL]
- Mullainathan, S., "The market for news", American economic review, 95(4), pp.1031~1053 (2005)
- Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2017, "Newman, N.", Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism, ~ (2017)
- Newberry, C, "How the Facebook Algorithm Works in 2022 and How to Make it Work for You" (2022), Hootsuite Inc
- Oeldorf-Hirsch, A., "Posting, commenting, and tagging : Effects of sharing news stories on Facebook", Computers in Human Behavior, 44, pp.240~249 (2015)
- Pariser, Eli, "The Filter Bubble : What the Internet Is Hiding from You" (2011), Penguin
- Park, C. S., "Social Media News and Its Impact", pp.98~121 (2021), Routledge
- "News Audiences Increasingly Politicized" (2004)[URL]
- "The Partisan Divide on Political Values Grows Even Wider" (2017)[URL]
- Pfau, M., "The Influence of Corporate Front-Group Stealth Campaigns", Communication Research, 34(1), pp.73~99 (2007)
- Polsby, N. W, "Consequences of party reform" (1983), Oxford University Press
- Rieder, B., "Towards platform observability", Internet Policy Review, 9(4), pp.1~28 (2020)
- Sonboli, N., "Fairness and transparency in recommendation: The users’ perspective", Proceedings of the 29th ACM Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization, pp.274~279 (2021)
- Speed, E., "The Rise of Post-truth Populism in Pluralist Liberal Democracies : Challenges for Health Policy", International Journal of Health Policy and Management, 6(5), pp.249~251 (2017)
- Suhay, E., "The role of anger in the biased assimilation of political information", Political Psychology, 39(4), pp.793~810 (2018)
- Sunstein, C. R, "Republic.com 2.0" (2009), Princeton University Press
- Sunstein, C. R, "#republic : Divided Democracy in the Age of Social Media" (2017), Princeton University Press
- Thurman, N., "The future of personalization at news websites: Lessons from a longitudinal study", Journalism Studies, 13(5-6), pp.775~790 (2012)
- Toff, B., ""I just google it" : Folk theories of distributed discovery", Journal of communication, 68(3), pp.636~657 (2018)
- Trilling, D., "Selective Exposure, Political Polarization, and Possible Mediators : Evidence from the Netherlands", International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 29(2), pp.189~213 (2017)
- Valeriani, A., "Accidental exposure to politics on social media as online participation equalizer in Germany, Italy, and the United Kingdom", New media & society, 18(9), pp.1857~1874 (2016)
- Van Aelst, P., "Political communication in a high- choice media environment: A challenge for democracy?", Annals of the International Communication Association, 41(1), pp.3~27 (2017)
- Wagner, M, "Affective polarization in multiparty systems", Electoral Studies, 69, pp.102199~ (2021)
- "Facebook Tweaks Newsfeed to Favor Content from Friends, Family" (2018)[URL]
- Tewksbury, D., "Accidentally informed : Incidental news exposure on the world wide web", Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 78, pp.533~554 (2001)[DOI]
- Yadamsuren, B., "Incidental exposure to online news", Synthesis Lectures on Information Concepts, Retrieval, and Services, 8(5), pp.73~ (2016)
- Zuiderveen Borgesius, F., "Should we worry about filter bubbles?. Internet Policy Review", Journal on Internet Regulation, 5(1), pp.1~16 (2016)
