편면적 대향범에 가담한 자에 대한 형법총칙상 공범규정의 적용가부
Liability of Accomplice in One-sided Criminality
1
조회
0
다운로드
14
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
There are some crimes that requires more than two individuals who participate in committing such crimes in two opposite ways and criminal code provides that the performer is punished for committing them(one-sided criminality). It is one of the controversial issues whether it is possible to apply general provisions on accomplice liability to such crimes. Korean Supreme Court is taking a stance that only the performer can be punished for committing those crimes and it is not allowed to punish the accomplice through application of general rules on accomplice liability. For example Supreme Court decision 2011Do6287 decided November 13, 2011 applied that principle judging two-way criminality between doctors who issued false prescriptions and a taker who instigated the doctors to issues false prescriptions and ruled that the doctors(the issuers) are the only criminal and the other part(the taker) is free from that crime. But the Supreme Court rulings is facing some heavy criticisms that it is not resonable that the taker who instigated the doctors to divulge issued false prescriptions should be punished as an instigator and the Supreme Court's stance will result in inequality between the principal offender and others actively involved. This article deals with problems concerning the liability of accomplice in one-sided criminality and proposes some solutions for them.
Abstract
There are some crimes that requires more than two individuals who participate in committing such crimes in two opposite ways and criminal code provides that the performer is punished for committing them(one-sided criminality). It is one of the controversial issues whether it is possible to apply general provisions on accomplice liability to such crimes. Korean Supreme Court is taking a stance that only the performer can be punished for committing those crimes and it is not allowed to punish the accomplice through application of general rules on accomplice liability. For example Supreme Court decision 2011Do6287 decided November 13, 2011 applied that principle judging two-way criminality between doctors who issued false prescriptions and a taker who instigated the doctors to issues false prescriptions and ruled that the doctors(the issuers) are the only criminal and the other part(the taker) is free from that crime. But the Supreme Court rulings is facing some heavy criticisms that it is not resonable that the taker who instigated the doctors to divulge issued false prescriptions should be punished as an instigator and the Supreme Court's stance will result in inequality between the principal offender and others actively involved. This article deals with problems concerning the liability of accomplice in one-sided criminality and proposes some solutions for them.
참고문헌 (17)
- 구길모, "대향범에 대한 공범규정 적용의 타당성 — 자본시장법상 미공개정보 이용행위에 대한 처벌규정을 중심으로 —", 안암법학, (40), pp.87~124 (2013), 안암법학회
- 김민이, "공무상비밀누설죄와 편면적 대향범 - 대법원 2011. 4. 28. 선고 2009도3642 판결을 중심으로 -", 홍익법학, 13(1), pp.831~855 (2012), 법학연구소
- 김상철, "제1차 정보수령자로부터 전달받은 미공개 내부정보를 이용하여 증권거래를 한 제2차 정보수령자에 대한 증권거래법위반죄의 공범으로 처벌할 수 있는지 여부", 대법원판례해설, (41) (2002)
- 김성돈, "불가벌적 대향자에 대한 공범규정배제론의 재검토, In 한국형사법학의 신전개" (2008)
- 김혜경, "비밀누설죄에서 대향자의 공범성립가능성 -대향범성과 자수범성을 중심으로-", 형사판례연구, 20, pp.273~321 (2012), 한국형사판례연구회[DOI]
- 류화진, "필요적 공범의 개념과 대향범의 유형 - 편면적 대향범을 중심으로", 법학논고, (30), pp.185~216 (2009), 법학연구원
- 문채규, "합동범의 공동정범", 형사법연구, (22), pp.23~40 (2004), 한국형사법학회
- 이진국, "對向犯의 構造에 관한 一考", 비교형사법연구, 4(1), pp.4~108 (2002), 한국비교형사법학회
- 이천현, "대향범에 대한 공범규정의 적용여부", 형사판례의 연구, 1 (2002)
- 원형식, "불가벌적 필요적 공범", 형사법연구, (24), pp.79~98 (2005), 한국형사법학회
- 이정원, "대향범인 필요적 공범에 대한 임의적 공범규정의 적용가능성", 형사법연구, 20(3), pp.109~126 (2008), 한국형사법학회
- 이정원, "제조업자의 염산날부핀 판매행위와 필요적 공범 - 대법원 2001.12.28. 선고, 2001도5158 판결 -", 형사법연구, 20(1), pp.239~257 (2008), 한국형사법학회
- 조국, "대향범 중 불가벌적 대향자에 대한 공범규정의 적용", 형사판례연구, (11) (2003)
- 최재경, "증권거래법상 내부자거래의 형사처벌 관련 문제", 법무연구, 27 (2000)
- 한인달, "변호사법 제34조 제4항과 편면적 대향범의 관계- 대상판결: 대법원 2004.10.28. 선고 2004도3994판결 평석 -", 법학연구, 19(1), pp.199~228 (2011), 법학연구소
- Jescheck, "Lehrbuch des Strafrechts AT" (1996)
- 山中敬一, "刑法總論" (2008)