宋代文人之伍子胥人物品評小考
A Study On Song Dynasty Literati’s Evaluation of Wu Zixu
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The stories of Wu Zixu could originate from the Pre-Qin period and be summarized as “Loyal Gentleman”, “Filial Piety” and “Revenge”. Since “Loyal Gentleman” and “Revenge” are two contrast words, Wu Zixu has always been a debatable figure in the views of the men of letters in later ages. With the proses in Song Dynasty as the major texts, this thesis has referred to both Confucian classics and historical materials, to probe into the characters, reasons and meaning of commenting on Wu Zixu. By taking a panoramic view of the overall history of commenting on Wu Zixu, it’s discovered that Song Dynasty was the turning period. At the beginning of the Northern Song Dynasty, the overall comments on Wu Zixu had relied on the fork beliefs, the scholars had worshiped Wu Zixu for the actual sacrifice demand, indoctrination and benediction. Such a surficial acceptance had been consistent with the comments on Wu Zixu in Tang Dynasty and lasted until the end of Song Dynasty. Although the rational criticism had shown up in the Southern Song Dynasty, worshiping and depreciation of Wu Zixu had existed side by side. With the interpretations of the Confucian classics, the scholars in the Southern Song Dynasty had deepened the exploration in the academic comment on Wu Zixu. The assessment range had been gradually expanded, from “loyal gentleman” to “revenge” and “death”. As the assessment goes deeper, specific arguments and logics have been proposed, the reasonable solution for self-adaptation and dream realization has been presented. The scholars in the Southern Song Dynasty had ushered in the history of comment on Wu Zixu and displayed a sense of distinct critical consciousness, forming up a certain scale and trend of comment on Wu Ziwu for the people in later ages.
Abstract
The stories of Wu Zixu could originate from the Pre-Qin period and be summarized as “Loyal Gentleman”, “Filial Piety” and “Revenge”. Since “Loyal Gentleman” and “Revenge” are two contrast words, Wu Zixu has always been a debatable figure in the views of the men of letters in later ages. With the proses in Song Dynasty as the major texts, this thesis has referred to both Confucian classics and historical materials, to probe into the characters, reasons and meaning of commenting on Wu Zixu. By taking a panoramic view of the overall history of commenting on Wu Zixu, it’s discovered that Song Dynasty was the turning period. At the beginning of the Northern Song Dynasty, the overall comments on Wu Zixu had relied on the fork beliefs, the scholars had worshiped Wu Zixu for the actual sacrifice demand, indoctrination and benediction. Such a surficial acceptance had been consistent with the comments on Wu Zixu in Tang Dynasty and lasted until the end of Song Dynasty. Although the rational criticism had shown up in the Southern Song Dynasty, worshiping and depreciation of Wu Zixu had existed side by side. With the interpretations of the Confucian classics, the scholars in the Southern Song Dynasty had deepened the exploration in the academic comment on Wu Zixu. The assessment range had been gradually expanded, from “loyal gentleman” to “revenge” and “death”. As the assessment goes deeper, specific arguments and logics have been proposed, the reasonable solution for self-adaptation and dream realization has been presented. The scholars in the Southern Song Dynasty had ushered in the history of comment on Wu Zixu and displayed a sense of distinct critical consciousness, forming up a certain scale and trend of comment on Wu Ziwu for the people in later ages.
참고문헌 (61)
- 魏㟲纂, "錢塘縣志", 哈佛大學燕京圖書館藏, ~
- 邵晉涵, "杭州府志", 哈佛大學燕京圖書館藏, ~
- 司馬遷, "史記·伍子胥列傳" (1959), 中華書局
- 郭慶藩, "莊子集釋" (1961), 中華書局
- "宋大詔令集" (1962), 中華書局
- 范曄, "後漢書" (1965), 中華書局
- 李延壽, "南史" (1975), 中華書局
- 劉昫, "舊唐書" (1975), 中華書局
- "十三經注疏" (1980), 中華書局
- 黃暉, "論衡校釋" (1990), 中華書局
- 胡寅, "致堂讀史管見" (1981), 台灣商務印書館
- 董誥, "全唐文" (1983), 中華書局
- 脫脫, "宋史" (1985), 中華書局
- 魯應, "閑窗括異志" (1985), 中華書局
- 陳郁, "影印文淵閣四庫全書" (1986), 台灣商務印書館
- 晁補之, "影印文淵閣四庫全書" (1986), 台灣商務印書館
- 黃震, "影印文淵閣四庫全書" (1986), 台灣商務印書館
- 呂祖謙, "影印文淵閣四庫全書" (1986), 台灣商務印書館
- 黎靖德, "影印文淵閣四庫全書" (1986), 台灣商務印書館
- 葉夢得, "影印文淵閣四庫全書" (1986), 台灣商務印書館
- 葉夢得, "影印文淵閣四庫全書" (1986), 台灣商務印書館
- 胡安國, "影印文淵閣四庫全書" (1986), 台灣商務印書館
- 陳深, "影印文淵閣四庫全書" (1986), 台灣商務印書館
- 高閌, "影印文淵閣四庫全書" (1986), 台灣商務印書館
- 李明復, "影印文淵閣四庫全書" (1986), 台灣商務印書館
- 陳傳良, "影印文淵閣四庫全書" (1986), 台灣商務印書館
- 家鉉翁, "影印文淵閣四庫全書" (1986), 台灣商務印書館
- 呂祖謙, "影印文淵閣四庫全書" (1986), 台灣商務印書館
- 洪咨夔, "影印文淵閣四庫全書" (1986), 台灣商務印書館
- 趙鵬飛, "影印文淵閣四庫全書" (1986), 台灣商務印書館
- 王先謙, "荀子集解" (1988), 中華書局
- 高海夫, "唐宋八大家文鈔校注集評·臨川文鈔" (1998), 三秦出版社
- 李昉, "中華傳世文選·文苑英華選" (1998), 吉林人民出版社
- 金志章, "四時幽賞錄(外十種)" (1999), 上海古籍出版社
- 蘇轍, "古史" (2001), 語文出版社
- 陳仁子, "續修四庫全書" (2002), 上海古籍出版社
- 陸心源, "宋代石刻文獻全編" (2003), 北京圖書館出版社
- 李勇先, "范仲淹全集" (2007), 四川大學出版社
- 張志烈, "蘇軾全集校注" (2010), 河北人民出版社
- 張栻, "張栻集" (2010), 嶽麓書社
- 王象之, "輿地紀勝" (2012), 浙江古籍出版社
- 袁韶, "錢塘先賢傳贊" (2014), 當代中國出版社
- 章權才, "宋明經學史" (1999), 廣東人民出版社
- 祝尚書, "宋代科舉與文學", 中華書局
- 王見川, "中國近世民間信仰：宋元明清" (2010), 上海人民出版社
- 李隆獻, "復仇觀的省察與詮釋：先秦兩漢魏晉南北朝隋唐編" (2012), 臺大出版中心
- 李隆獻, "復仇觀的省察與詮釋：宋元明清編" (2015), 臺大出版中心
- 苗江磊, "伍子胥復讐形象研究", 碩士, pp.2016
- 김연지, "朝鮮中後期文人의 伍子胥論評硏究", 碩士, pp.2018
- 陳登武, "復讎新釋-從皇權的角度再論唐宋復讎個案", 臺灣師大歷史學報, (31) (2003)
- 付朝, "改革開放以來伍子胥研究述評", 孫子研究, (3) (2016)
- 苗江磊, "伍子胥評説的歷史審視", 廣東開放大學學報, (4) (2017)
- 陳玉平, "伍子胥故事研究綜述及其前景展望-以中國敘事文化學為依據", 天中學刊, (4) (2019)
- 苗江磊, "伍子胥‘忠吳說’考述", 周口師範學院學報, (4) (2019)
- 윤세순, "역사인물 오자서에 대한 조선 지식인의 인식태도", 민족문학사연구, (51), pp.200~229 (2013), 민족문학사연구소
- ZHUWENLIANG, "试论朝鮮文人對伍子胥的接受", 중국어문학논집, (119), pp.401~421 (2019), 중국어문학연구회
- 권운영, "伍子胥와 중국의 복수 문화", 중국학논총, (70), pp.79~105 (2020), 중국학연구소[DOI]
- 양중석, "『史記 伍子胥列傳』에 투영된 역사 재편의 함의", 중국어문학지, (72), pp.67~87 (2020), 중국어문학회[DOI]
- 정하정, "조선 후기 北伐論의 餘脈과 伍子胥 담론", 한국한문학연구, (81), pp.297~334 (2021), 한국한문학회[DOI]
- 고광민, "대립의 관점으로 본 「伍子胥列傳」의 구도 연구", 중국어문학논집, (129), pp.193~215 (2021), 중국어문학연구회
- 김이식, "‘伍子胥 이야기’의 계승과 변용－ ≪史記･伍子胥列傳≫을 중심으로 －", 중국어문학, (86), pp.5~28 (2021), 영남중국어문학회[DOI]