본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

17~18世紀中韓伍子胥接受比較研究 -以散文為中心

A Comparative Study of Wu Zixu's Reception between China and Joseon in the 17th and 18th Centuries -Focused on prose-

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

In the 50 years since the Imjin War, there have been frequent wars in the Northeast Asia. Major changes have taken place in the international situation, where Joseon has formed a triangular relationship with the Ming and Qing (later Jin) Dynasties. The late Ming survivors, the early Qing, and Joseon literati together bear the national enmity and personal hatred; their hearts are full of righteous indignation and a sense of revenge. Wu Zixu, who was synonymous with revenge, attracted much attention from both Chinese and Joseon literati at that time. This paper takes the prose of Chinese and Joseon literati from the 17th to 18th centuries as the research object, and attempts to examine the similarities, differences, and specific characteristics of Chinese and Joseon literati's acceptance of Wu Zixu. During this period, the acceptance of Wu Zixu by Chinese and Joseon literati appeared to be wide, in-depth, and meticulous. As a historical figure in China’s pre-Qin period, compared with Chinese literati, there is a certain lag in the acceptance by Joseon literati, and there are subtle differences. Chinese literati inherited the style of critique from Song Dynasty, focusing on "loyalty to Wu" and "revenge", criticizing the former while affirming the latter. The Joseon literati of the same period focused on the discussion of "loyalty to Chu", "filial piety" and "revenge" based on the maintenance of the authority of the patriarch and presented a total negation. This should have a lot to do with the ideology of the ruling class in Joseon and the international situation it was in at that time. At the same time, it is precisely because Wu Zixu is a foreign historical figure, that Joseon literati can use their imagination and propose ideal character settings for him.

Abstract

In the 50 years since the Imjin War, there have been frequent wars in the Northeast Asia. Major changes have taken place in the international situation, where Joseon has formed a triangular relationship with the Ming and Qing (later Jin) Dynasties. The late Ming survivors, the early Qing, and Joseon literati together bear the national enmity and personal hatred; their hearts are full of righteous indignation and a sense of revenge. Wu Zixu, who was synonymous with revenge, attracted much attention from both Chinese and Joseon literati at that time. This paper takes the prose of Chinese and Joseon literati from the 17th to 18th centuries as the research object, and attempts to examine the similarities, differences, and specific characteristics of Chinese and Joseon literati's acceptance of Wu Zixu. During this period, the acceptance of Wu Zixu by Chinese and Joseon literati appeared to be wide, in-depth, and meticulous. As a historical figure in China’s pre-Qin period, compared with Chinese literati, there is a certain lag in the acceptance by Joseon literati, and there are subtle differences. Chinese literati inherited the style of critique from Song Dynasty, focusing on "loyalty to Wu" and "revenge", criticizing the former while affirming the latter. The Joseon literati of the same period focused on the discussion of "loyalty to Chu", "filial piety" and "revenge" based on the maintenance of the authority of the patriarch and presented a total negation. This should have a lot to do with the ideology of the ruling class in Joseon and the international situation it was in at that time. At the same time, it is precisely because Wu Zixu is a foreign historical figure, that Joseon literati can use their imagination and propose ideal character settings for him.

참고문헌 (34)

  1. 阮元, "春秋公羊傳注疏" (1980), 中華書局
  2. 阮元, "春秋左傳注疏" (1980), 中華書局
  3. 吳應箕, "樓山堂集" (1985), 中華書局
  4. 朱元英, "左傳博議拾遺" (1991), 中華書局
  5. 姚鼐, "惜抱軒詩文集" (1992), 上海古籍出版社
  6. 洪亮吉, "歷朝史案" (1992), 巴蜀書社
  7. 徐必遠, "六谷遺稿" (1994), 民族文化推進會
  8. 吳允常, "寧齋先生文集,韓國歷代文集叢書" (1995), 景仁文化社
  9. 申靖夏, "恕菴集" (1997), 民族文化推進會
  10. 金春澤, "北軒集" (1997), 民族文化推進會
  11. 俞萬柱, "欽英2" (1997), 首爾大學奎章閣
  12. 金志章, "四時幽賞錄(外十種)" (1999), 上海古籍出版社
  13. 朱一是, "為可堂初集,四庫未收書輯" (2000), 北京出版社
  14. 尹行恁, "碩齋稿" (2002), 民族文化推進會
  15. 金就文, "『久庵集』卷2" (2005), 民族文化推進會
  16. 柳袗, "修巖集" (2006), 民族文化推進會
  17. 林象德, "老村集" (2006), 民族文化推進會
  18. 南龍萬, "活山集" (2009), 民族文化推進會
  19. 丁耀亢, "「天史」校釋" (2009), 齊魯書社
  20. 李隆獻, "復讐觀的省察與詮釋:先秦兩漢魏晉南北朝隋唐編" (2012), 臺大出版中心
  21. 李隆獻, "復讐觀的省察與詮釋:宋元明清編" (2015), 臺大出版中心
  22. 付朝, "改革開放以來伍子胥研究述評", 孫子研究, (3) (2016)
  23. 陳玉平, "伍子胥故事研究綜述及其前景展望-以中國敘事文化學為依據", 天中學刊, (4) (2019)
  24. 苗江磊, "伍子胥復讐形象研究", 碩士, pp.2016
  25. 김연지, "朝鮮 中後期 文人의 伍子胥 論評 硏究", 碩士, pp.2018
  26. 김난정, "伍子胥 복수 서사에 대한 史評 연구", 碩士, pp.2022
  27. 朱文亮, "조선의 오자서 수용 양상 연구", 博士, pp.2022
  28. 허태용, "17·18세기 北伐論의 추이와 北學論의 대두", 대동문화연구, (69), pp.373~418 (2010), 대동문화연구원[DOI]
  29. 윤세순, "역사인물 오자서에 대한 조선 지식인의 인식태도", 민족문학사연구, (51), pp.200~229 (2013), 민족문학사연구소
  30. 苗江磊, "伍子胥評説的歷史審視", 廣東開放大學學報, (4) (2017)
  31. 苗江磊, "伍子胥‘忠吳說’考述", 周口師範學院學報, (4) (2019)
  32. ZHUWENLIANG, "试论朝鮮文人對伍子胥的接受", 중국어문학논집, (119), pp.401~421 (2019), 중국어문학연구회
  33. 정하정, "조선 후기 北伐論의 餘脈과 伍子胥 담론", 한국한문학연구, (81), pp.297~334 (2021), 한국한문학회[DOI]
  34. ZHUWENLIANG, "宋代文人之伍子胥人物品評小考", 中國散文硏究集刊, 11, pp.53~73 (2021), 한국중국산문학회[DOI]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (6건)