복수의 당위성과 가려진 고뇌-효에 바탕한 복수서사를 중심으로-
Agony Hidden behind the Justification of Vengence: Focussing on Revenge Narratives Based on Fillial Piety
0
조회
0
다운로드
8
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Although mostly focused on blood line, the norms of ancient Chinese on revenge seems very settled. The examples of flabbergasted promises and actions of revenge is shown in many chronicles or literature. I believe that the reason for excessive generosity on vengence is because the actions are based on Confucius beliefs such as fillial piety or loyalty. Therefore vengence is considered one of the virtues even for gentlemen of China who are considered to have the complete personality. In many literature of ancient China, the characters are seen to revenge for their family or parents under the name of piety. Even the bastard sons who have never felt the love from their parents turn into god of vengence only because they are children. Even the tiniest bit of empathy or emotions of human is left aside. It is because the reasons and causes of vengence is based upon the Confusius beliefs that are absolutely believed in ancient China. Therefore, although sometimes morality and reason can be a tool to hinder vengence, but in ancient China, those reason and morality can be the reason to revenge. The revision of Wuzixu(伍子胥), bastard son of GanJiang・Moye(干將莫耶), or Zhaoshiguer(趙氏孤兒) clearly shows that the Confucius conscience is dominant over personal emotions in deep subconscious of the Chinese. Furthermore, we can take one more step forward to human nature by looking back at their agony and conflicts hidden by their Confucius reasoning.
Abstract
Although mostly focused on blood line, the norms of ancient Chinese on revenge seems very settled. The examples of flabbergasted promises and actions of revenge is shown in many chronicles or literature. I believe that the reason for excessive generosity on vengence is because the actions are based on Confucius beliefs such as fillial piety or loyalty. Therefore vengence is considered one of the virtues even for gentlemen of China who are considered to have the complete personality. In many literature of ancient China, the characters are seen to revenge for their family or parents under the name of piety. Even the bastard sons who have never felt the love from their parents turn into god of vengence only because they are children. Even the tiniest bit of empathy or emotions of human is left aside. It is because the reasons and causes of vengence is based upon the Confusius beliefs that are absolutely believed in ancient China. Therefore, although sometimes morality and reason can be a tool to hinder vengence, but in ancient China, those reason and morality can be the reason to revenge. The revision of Wuzixu(伍子胥), bastard son of GanJiang・Moye(干將莫耶), or Zhaoshiguer(趙氏孤兒) clearly shows that the Confucius conscience is dominant over personal emotions in deep subconscious of the Chinese. Furthermore, we can take one more step forward to human nature by looking back at their agony and conflicts hidden by their Confucius reasoning.
참고문헌 (19)
- 기군상, "조씨고아" (2007), 한국외국어대학교 출판부
- 김성규, "사마천에서 볼테르까지: ‘趙氏孤兒’ 이야기의 進化 略史", 역사교육, (141), pp.159~195 (2017), 역사교육연구회[DOI]
- 리펑페이, "고대 중국의 ‘복수’ 관념과 그 문학적 표현", 민족문화연구, (65), pp.345~375 (2014), 민족문화연구원[DOI]
- 사마천, "사기열전" (2015), 위즈덤하우스
- 사마천, "사기세가" (2015), 위즈덤하우스
- 심도희, "고대 유교의 ‘효’ 사상과 그 특수성에 관한 연구", 박사, pp.2015
- 오수경, "역사적 기억과 휴머니티로 다시 읽는 중국 고전 희곡, 〈조씨고아〉", 중국문학, 93, pp.215~233 (2017), 한국중국어문학회[DOI]
- 윤세순, "역사인물 오자서에 대한 조선 지식인의 인식태도", 민족문학사연구, (51), pp.200~229 (2013), 민족문학사연구소
- "인간은 왜 복수에 매달릴까" (2017), 이성규[URL]
- 장준영, "검은 협객, 푸른 검(劍)의 노래 – 노신「주검(鑄劍)」의 ‘복수(復讎)’ 미학을 중심으로", 외국문학연구, (50), pp.245~266 (2013), 외국문학연구소
- 정병섭, "禮記集說大全・曲禮上" (2012), 학고방
- "論語", ~
- "禮記", ~
- "詩經", ~
- "太平御覽", ~
- 杜預, "春秋左傳正義, 권14" (1999), 北京大學出版社
- 干寶, "搜神記" (1984), 里仁書局
- 李德裕, "全唐文" (1983), 中华书局
- 許愼, "說文解字注" (1997), 上海古籍出版社
