배움과 기록의 전범화 고찰:茅坤의 ≪唐宋八大家文鈔≫ 수록 ‘學記’를 중심으로
A Study on the Modelization of Learning and Records : Focus on Xueji(學記) which are in MaoKun’s Tangsongbadajiawenchao
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The arranger(editor) of the anthology attempts to scripture the work through the selection of the work and criticism. In other words, from the perspective of Canonization, Mao Kun arranged the works of the Tang Song period reflect his values which about classical literature and social background at the time. In particular, the writers of Song Dynasty and Ming Dynasty have many similar parts. Both of them developed philosophical reasons and valued the function of literature. In addition, both periods politically advocated 'politics through literature' and implemented the Keju(科擧) system to give and promote literature and education considerably. Politics and education are closely related to canonization. As is well known, in literary history, the "唐宋古文運動" was both a literary and social movement. After Mao Kun, each of the eight literal advisors during the Tangsong period was canonized with the concept of "TangSongBadajia(唐宋八大家)" which again linked the negative effects and education of the Keju(科擧) system which for selecting talented person during the Ming dynasty. In this study, the “records of school" was viewed as learning, and examined the perception of learning held by ancient Chinese writers. In any case, learning is not simply an action from the learner's point of view, but reflects a lot of content and perception. For example, the perception of the space of school, a place where learning takes place, and the educational philosophical meaning and perception of the behavior and ideal pursuit in this space. In the case of the "records of school" it can be seen as a record of a building called a school or a record of learning. The architecture reflects the aesthetics of the builder, values and spatial consciousness, and the social background at the time. In short, it can be said that the "records of school" included in the Mao Kun's "TangSong Badajia WenChao(唐宋八大家文鈔)" was not only for educational purposes for the Keju(科擧) system, but also for the attempt of Canonization in the TangSong Badajia’s works and the relationship between the Song and the Ming dynasty.
Abstract
The arranger(editor) of the anthology attempts to scripture the work through the selection of the work and criticism. In other words, from the perspective of Canonization, Mao Kun arranged the works of the Tang Song period reflect his values which about classical literature and social background at the time. In particular, the writers of Song Dynasty and Ming Dynasty have many similar parts. Both of them developed philosophical reasons and valued the function of literature. In addition, both periods politically advocated 'politics through literature' and implemented the Keju(科擧) system to give and promote literature and education considerably. Politics and education are closely related to canonization. As is well known, in literary history, the "唐宋古文運動" was both a literary and social movement. After Mao Kun, each of the eight literal advisors during the Tangsong period was canonized with the concept of "TangSongBadajia(唐宋八大家)" which again linked the negative effects and education of the Keju(科擧) system which for selecting talented person during the Ming dynasty. In this study, the “records of school" was viewed as learning, and examined the perception of learning held by ancient Chinese writers. In any case, learning is not simply an action from the learner's point of view, but reflects a lot of content and perception. For example, the perception of the space of school, a place where learning takes place, and the educational philosophical meaning and perception of the behavior and ideal pursuit in this space. In the case of the "records of school" it can be seen as a record of a building called a school or a record of learning. The architecture reflects the aesthetics of the builder, values and spatial consciousness, and the social background at the time. In short, it can be said that the "records of school" included in the Mao Kun's "TangSong Badajia WenChao(唐宋八大家文鈔)" was not only for educational purposes for the Keju(科擧) system, but also for the attempt of Canonization in the TangSong Badajia’s works and the relationship between the Song and the Ming dynasty.
참고문헌 (54)
- 高海夫, "唐宋八大家文鈔校注集評" (1998), 三秦出版社
- 褚斌傑, "中國古代文體論" (1990), 北京大學出版社
- 馮永敏, "散文鑑賞藝術探微" (1998), 文史哲出版社
- 李正西, "中國散文藝術論" (1990), 貫雅文化事業有限公司
- 楊慶存, "宋代散文硏究" (2011), 人民文學出版社
- 孫琴安, "中國評點文學史" (1999), 上海社會科學院出版社
- 劉敍傑, "中國古代建築史 : 宋, 遼, 金, 西夏建築" (2003), 中國建築工業
- 劉敦楨, "中國古代建築史" (1995), 세진사
- 毛心一, "中國建築史" (2008), 東方出版社
- 高克勤, "王安石與北宋文學硏究" (2006), 復旦大學出版社
- 古津, "科擧與詩藝 – 宋代文學與士人社會" (2005), 上海古籍出版社
- 송기채, "역주 당송팔대가문초" (2011), 전통문화연구회
- 리쩌허우, "중국고대사상사론" (2005), 한길사
- 존 앤더슨, "문화·장소·흔적 : 문화지리로 세상 읽기" (2013), 한울 아카데미
- 진필상, "漢文文體論" (2001), 이회문화사
- 심경호, "漢文散文의 美學" (2005), 고려대학교 출판부
- 오수형, "唐宋八大家의 산문 세계" (2000), 서울대학교 출판부
- 장파, "동양과 서양, 그리고 미학" (2009), 푸른숲
- 김지민, "한국의 유교건축" (1996), 발언
- 呂湘瑜, "通代古文評點選本研究", 博士, pp.2008
- 宋 祥, "中國古代勸學文硏究", 博士, pp.2012
- 金美羅, "朝鮮文壇的唐宋古文取向硏究 –以茅坤及其≪唐宋八大家文鈔≫的影響爲中心", 博士, pp.2019
- 李 佳, "北宋建築物記硏究", 博士, pp.2018
- 韓冬靑, "宋代學記考述", 碩士, pp.2011
- 김송주, "증공 기문 연구", 석사, 중어중문학, pp.2010
- 이종찬, "경기지역 향교, 서원의 廟, 學공간간 건축적 위계성에 관한 연구", 석사, 건축공학과 건축계획전공, pp.2014
- 金鍾燮, "曾鞏散文硏究", 석사, 중국어중문학, pp.1990
- 劉文瀾, "歐陽修讚美興學建校", 廣州敎育, (1) (1987)
- 周 傑, "王安石學記硏究", 長城, (6) (2013)
- 周 傑, "宋代敎育·科擧發展與學記繁榮", 北方文學, (6) (2019)
- 倪春軍, "“宋四家”學記芻議", 新宋學, (3) (2014)
- 劉成國, "宋代學記硏究", 文學遺産, (4) (2007)
- 任竟澤, "論宋代古文家學記", 山西師大學報, (4) (2010)
- 郭艶麗, "從學記文看曾鞏的敎育觀", 南陽理工學院學報 (2012)
- 牛麗娟, "宋代六大家學記散文硏究", 齊齊合爾師範高等專科學校學報, (3) (2015)
- 李光生, "宋代書院記的文化闡釋", 蘭州學刊, (6) (2016)
- 朱 剛, "士大夫文化的兩種模式: ＜虔州學記＞與＜南安軍學記＞", 江海學刊 (2007)
- 朱 剛, "“修廟”與“立學”: 北宋學記類文章的一個話題 — 從王安石＜繁昌縣學記＞入手", 華東師範大學學報 (2018)
- 韓 芳, "宋學記文“學之效”內容書寫硏究", 靑海師範大學學報 (2017)
- 譚新紅, "論宋人對唐宋文經典的建構", 江漢大學學報 (2018)
- 鍾吉雄, "勸學與學記的比較", 師友月刊, (174) (1981)
- 郭玲妦, "北宋興學與州縣學記之發展", 高雄師大國文學報, (29) (2019)
- 김미라, "王禹偁의 ‘臺閣名勝記’ 硏究", 열린정신 인문학 연구, 11(2), pp.5~28 (2010), 인문학연구소[DOI]
- 이재훈, "北宋 ‘園記’에 나타나는 文人들의 공간 인식 ― 李格非의 ≪洛陽名園記≫를 중심으로 ―", 중국학논총, (36), pp.111~136 (2012), 중국학연구소[DOI]
- 김종섭, "‘唐宋八大家’의 형성 배경에 대한 一考", 중국문학, 8 (1997)
- 권석환, "중세 고전 산문의 중세적 典範(Canon)에 관한 연구 — 당송 산문을 중심으로", 중국문학연구, 23 (2001)
- 백광준, "≪당송팔대가문초≫의 기원에 관하여", 중국문학, 43 (2005)
- 이기훈, "唐宋八大家 문장의 淵源說 初探", 동방한문학, (59), pp.277~310 (2014), 동방한문학회[DOI]
- 곽노봉, "曾鞏 散文理論과 特徵", 中國學硏究, 9 (1994)
- 이철원, "중국의 전통건축문화에 반영된 정치적 의미", 중국문화연구, (9), pp.431~452 (2006), 중국문화연구학회
- 당윤희, "明代의 古文과 時文에 대한 一考 ― 唐宋八大家 古文選集을 중심으로", 중국어문논역총간, (35), pp.127~150 (2014), 중국어문논역학회
- 당윤희, "茅坤의 唐宋 古文 評點 비평에 대한 고찰 – 《唐宋八大家文鈔》를 중심으로", 중국문학, 86, pp.45~69 (2016), 한국중국어문학회[DOI]
- 당윤희, "명대 중기 시문선집 ≪文體明辨≫의 문체론 고찰", 중국학논총, (61), pp.99~134 (2018), 중국학연구소[DOI]
- 張德建, "明代學記文的集體形態及其超隱定性特徵", 중국산문연구집간, 1 (2011)