茅坤 『唐宋八大家文鈔』의 비평용어 ‘典刑’에 관한 연구 - 曾鞏의 ‘序文’을 중심으로
Study on MaoKun’s Critical terminologu ‘Dianxing(典刑)’ in his Tangsongbadajiawenchao – Focus on his criticism for ZengGong’s Xuwen(序文)
2
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study is about the critical terminology “Dianxing(典刑)” used in Mao Kun(茅坤)’s literary anthology Tangsongbadajiawenchao(唐宋八大家文鈔), which aims to analyze and examine its meaning and application cases in terms of style criticism and character criticism. First, as a literary anthology, it will be explained that Mao Kun’s Tangsongbadajiawenchao has classical characteristics and expresses his critical significance. Next, I try to examine the origin of critical terminology “Dianxing(典刑)” and define its meaning. Finally, I try to analyze the text of proof as the main text, which is about Mao Kun, has most frequently used the critical terminology “Dianxing(典刑)” which is for Zeng Gong(曾鞏). And I focused on Xuwen(序文) and the stylistic definition and try to examine how its creative examples have applied. In addition, I try to analyze it, which is applied to Zeng Gong(曾鞏)’s “Xuwen(序文)” criticism of later writers and Mao Kun’s one, to examine the similarities and differences between them, and to identify his impact.
Abstract
This study is about the critical terminology “Dianxing(典刑)” used in Mao Kun(茅坤)’s literary anthology Tangsongbadajiawenchao(唐宋八大家文鈔), which aims to analyze and examine its meaning and application cases in terms of style criticism and character criticism. First, as a literary anthology, it will be explained that Mao Kun’s Tangsongbadajiawenchao has classical characteristics and expresses his critical significance. Next, I try to examine the origin of critical terminology “Dianxing(典刑)” and define its meaning. Finally, I try to analyze the text of proof as the main text, which is about Mao Kun, has most frequently used the critical terminology “Dianxing(典刑)” which is for Zeng Gong(曾鞏). And I focused on Xuwen(序文) and the stylistic definition and try to examine how its creative examples have applied. In addition, I try to analyze it, which is applied to Zeng Gong(曾鞏)’s “Xuwen(序文)” criticism of later writers and Mao Kun’s one, to examine the similarities and differences between them, and to identify his impact.
참고문헌 (33)
- 吳納, "文章辯體序說·文體明辯序說" (1998), 人民文學出版社
- 高海夫, "唐宋八大家校注集評" (1998), 三秦出版社
- 송기채, "역주 당송팔대가문초" (2011), 전통문화연구회
- 張壽康, "古代文章學槪論" (1983), 武漢大學出版社
- 姜濤, "古代散文文體槪論" (1990), 山西人民出版社
- 馮永敏, "散文鑑賞藝術探微" (1998), 文史哲出版社
- 진필상, "한문문체론" (2001), 이회문화사
- 심경호, "한문산문의 미학" (2005), 고려대학교 출판부
- 주래상, "中國古典美學" (2003), 미진사
- 오수형, "唐宋八大家의 산문 세계" (2000), 서울대학교 출판부
- 周振甫, "文心雕龍今譯" (2005), 中華書局
- 劉尊擧, "唐宋派文學思想硏究", 博士, pp.2006
- 呂湘瑜, "通代古文評點選本研究", 博士, pp.2008
- 鄭恩錫, "唐宋派古文評點硏究", 碩士, pp.2010
- 鄧韶玉, "論曾鞏散文對明代唐宋派的影響", 許昌師專學報, (04) (1989)
- 劉溶, "歐陽修、王安石、曾鞏的文章理論", 北京師範學院學報, (05) (1990)
- 胡建次, "古代文學評點體例與方式的傳承", 咸陽師範學院學報, (01) (2006)
- 喩進芳, "明代唐宋派對曾鞏的推尊", 人文論譚 (2009)
- 喩進芳, "論曾鞏的編輯理念及其現實意義", 江漢大學學報, (06) (2014)
- 喩進芳, "曾鞏校勘學論略", 圖書館工作與硏究, (09) (2016)
- 雛自振, "從元明淸評論看曾鞏散文的歷史地位", 福州師專學報, (4) (1998)
- 葛懷東, "曾鞏整理古籍的活動與影響", 中國典籍與文化, (08) (1999)
- 葛懷東, "曾鞏在校讎史上的貢獻", 常熟高專學報, (03) (1999)
- 林春虹, "『唐宋八大家文鈔』與茅坤的文統觀", 宜賓學院學報, (10) (2011)
- 吳承學, "文章總集與文體學硏究", 古典文學知識, (04) (2013)
- 汪泓, "中國傳統文化語境中文學“典型”批評的文體學意義", 中山大學學報, (01) (2012)
- 汪泓, "中國古代人物品評中的“典型”批評", 江西師範大學學報, (5) (2011)
- 黎淸, "曾鞏散文的經典化及其多維闡譯", 江西社會科學, (11) (2020)
- 이승신, "北宋初 散文 文體의 변화와 발전에 대하여", 중국어문학지, (19), pp.139~170 (2005), 중국어문학회
- 백광준, "≪唐宋八大家文鈔≫의 起源에 관하여", 중국문학, 43, pp.95~114 (2005), 한국중국어문학회
- 이기훈, "唐宋八大家 문장의 淵源說 初探", 동방한문학, (59), pp.277~310 (2014), 동방한문학회[DOI]
- 당윤희, "茅坤의 唐宋 古文 評點 비평에 대한 고찰 – 《唐宋八大家文鈔》를 중심으로", 중국문학, 86, pp.45~69 (2016), 한국중국어문학회[DOI]
- 당윤희, "명대 중기 시문선집 ≪文體明辨≫의 문체론 고찰", 중국학논총, (61), pp.99~134 (2018), 중국학연구소[DOI]