야담의 전개와 경화세족
Yadam(野談) and Kyounghwasejok(京華世族)
0
조회
0
다운로드
13
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In this article, I tried to explain the relation between Yadam and Kyounghwasejok(京華世族). There are many Yadam anthology editors who belong to Kyounghwasejok. Imbang(任埅), Immae(任邁), Lee Hyipeong(李羲平), Lee Wyonmoung(李源命), Lee Hyonki(李玄綺) belong to Kyounghwasejok. No Myongheom(盧命欽) and Seo Yuyeong(徐有英) don't belong to Kyounghwasejok, but they are closely related to the people of Kyounghwasejok Imbang, Immae, Lee Hyipeong, Lee Wyonmoung represented the cultural experience of their own group in the boundary of their own class. By comparison, Lee Hyonki showed a very critical perspective toward the world view of Kyounghwasejok in their own ordinary life boundary. No Myongheom was faithful in portraying the mood of the storytelling space of Hong Bonghan's family. Seo Yuyeong was eager to represent the inclination of the members of Hong Sanhan's family who had strong aspiration towards literature. Yadam as the representative literary genre of Late Chosun Dynasty was based on the experience of people in Late Chosun society. But Yadam anthologies whose editors had intimate relationship with Kyounghwasejok moved to the opposite direction of reality where benevolence and destiny had crucial power. This change was caused by the world view of Kyounhwasejok. On the contrary, An Seokgeong who edited Sapgyomanrok and Lee Donyun who edited Paksochonwha din't belong to Kyounghwasejok. They empathized the hegemonical ideology. Specially, they discriminated the peoples who participated in the political rebellion. Yadam as a narrative genre began to accept the importance of human desire and acknowledge the necessity of fulfilling the desire. However, in the process of recording by the editors of Kyounghwasejok, Yadam's contents and form were transformed. Destiny and benevolence became overestimated. As Kyounghwasejok participated in the recording and editing Yadam, these kinds of change appeared. As a result, the conflict between desire and destiny, human being and superior being, secular and unworldliness emerged as a significant part in Yadam anthology.
Abstract
In this article, I tried to explain the relation between Yadam and Kyounghwasejok(京華世族). There are many Yadam anthology editors who belong to Kyounghwasejok. Imbang(任埅), Immae(任邁), Lee Hyipeong(李羲平), Lee Wyonmoung(李源命), Lee Hyonki(李玄綺) belong to Kyounghwasejok. No Myongheom(盧命欽) and Seo Yuyeong(徐有英) don't belong to Kyounghwasejok, but they are closely related to the people of Kyounghwasejok Imbang, Immae, Lee Hyipeong, Lee Wyonmoung represented the cultural experience of their own group in the boundary of their own class. By comparison, Lee Hyonki showed a very critical perspective toward the world view of Kyounghwasejok in their own ordinary life boundary. No Myongheom was faithful in portraying the mood of the storytelling space of Hong Bonghan's family. Seo Yuyeong was eager to represent the inclination of the members of Hong Sanhan's family who had strong aspiration towards literature. Yadam as the representative literary genre of Late Chosun Dynasty was based on the experience of people in Late Chosun society. But Yadam anthologies whose editors had intimate relationship with Kyounghwasejok moved to the opposite direction of reality where benevolence and destiny had crucial power. This change was caused by the world view of Kyounhwasejok. On the contrary, An Seokgeong who edited Sapgyomanrok and Lee Donyun who edited Paksochonwha din't belong to Kyounghwasejok. They empathized the hegemonical ideology. Specially, they discriminated the peoples who participated in the political rebellion. Yadam as a narrative genre began to accept the importance of human desire and acknowledge the necessity of fulfilling the desire. However, in the process of recording by the editors of Kyounghwasejok, Yadam's contents and form were transformed. Destiny and benevolence became overestimated. As Kyounghwasejok participated in the recording and editing Yadam, these kinds of change appeared. As a result, the conflict between desire and destiny, human being and superior being, secular and unworldliness emerged as a significant part in Yadam anthology.
참고문헌 (37)
- "계서야담" (1981), 태학사
- "觀白軒遺稿", ~
- "四代遺稿集", ~
- 김종권, "금계필담" (1985), 명문당
- "기리총화(임형택 소장본)", ~
- "동패락송 외 5종" (1990), 아세아문화사
- "杜溪集", ~
- "鹿隱集", ~
- 박용식, "잡기고담" (1989), 태동
- "長洲集", ~
- "해탁", 新興書局 有限公司
- 홍용한, "盧拙翁傳. in: 長洲集"
- 洪稷榮, "동패락송발. in: 小洲集"
- 강명관, "조선후기 경화세족과 古董書畵 취미", 동양한문학연구, 12
- 강명관, "조선시대 문학 예술의 생성 공간", 소명
- 강여진, "『삽교집』 해제" (1991), 민족문화추진회
- 강혜규, "삽교 안석경의 산문 연구", 석사, pp.2006
- 김려, "題思齋摭言卷後. in: 담정유고 영인" (1984), 계명문화사
- 김영진, "조선후기 사대부의 야담 창작과 향유의 일양상", 어문논집, 37 (1998), 안암어문학회
- 김영진, "유만주의 ‘한문단편’에 대한 일고찰", 대동한문학, 13 (2000), 대동한문학회
- 김영진, "『기리총화』에 대한 일고찰-편찬자 확정과 후대 야담집과의 관련 양상을 중심으로", 한국한문학연구 (2001), 한국한문학회
- 서유구, "怡雲志. in: 林園經濟志 영인본 제5책", 보경문화사
- 안대회, "18·19세기의 주거문화와 상상의 정원― 조선 후기 산문가의 記文을 중심으로 ―", 진단학보, (97), pp.111~138 (2004), 진단학회
- 安大會, "稗林과 조선후기 野史叢書의 발달", 南冥學硏究, (20), pp.299~327 (2005), 경남문화연구원
- 이강옥, "한국야담연구" (2006), 돌베개
- 이강옥, "「동야휘집」의 중국 필기소설 전유와 그 의미", 한국문학논총, (48), pp.5~36 (2008), 한국문학회
- 이명학, "안석경과 그의 한문단편들. in: 야담문학연구의 현단계 1" (2001), 보고사
- 이병직, "이동윤의 사상과 『박소촌화』의 저작 동기", 문창어문논집 (2002), 문창어문학회
- 이승현, "『기리총화』 연구", 석사, pp.2009
- 이종묵, "조선후기 경화세족의 주거문화와 四宜堂", 漢文學報, 19, pp.567~592 (2008), 우리한문학회
- 임완혁, "구연 전통과 서사" (2008), 태학사
- 진재교, "智水拈筆 연구의 一端 - 작가 홍한주의 가문과 그의 삶-", 漢文學報, 12(1), pp.325~351 (2005), 우리한문학회
- 진재교, "19세기 京華世族의 讀書文化 -洪奭周 家門을 중심으로-", 漢文學報, 16(1), pp.137~168 (2007), 우리한문학회
- 최식, "洪吉周의 卜居와 ?孰遂念?", 동방한문학, (28), pp.187~215 (2005), 동방한문학회
- 최식, "沆瀣 홍길주 산문 연구", 박사, pp.2005
- 홍길주, "수여방필. in: 19세기 조선지식인의 생각 창고", 돌베개
- "한국계행보(天)" (1992), 보고사
