본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

홍석주의 시론 연구

A Study on Hong, Seok-ju(洪奭周)’s Poetics

0

조회

0

다운로드

7

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류한국어와문학

초록

This study inquires into the Yeon-cheon(淵泉) Hong Seok-ju(洪奭周)'s criticism of poetry in the aspect of the poetic nature, versification, and function. About the poetic nature, it is based on the innate nature and emotion(性情) - poet's poetic consciousness, and then originate from the cheon-ki(天機) as the realization of the truth of space, reason of nature, and world's duty. About the versification, poetic meaning(意) must be expressed truly and frankly(眞摯), poetic words(辭) must be transferred logically and correctly(條達), and poetic spirit(氣) must be flowed and moved freely that not be blocked(流動). About the poetic function, poetic use(用) is impressing people(感人); poetic merit(功) is inspiring reader's heart, making them endeavor, encouraging the good and punishing the evil, and satiring the world(興勸懲創); poetic effect(效) is changing customs toward good way(移風易俗). In the future, there remain comparing and examining criticism of poetry of Hong Seok-ju and China. Also, it is thought that how Hong Seok-ju's criticism of poetry is applied to actual criticism must be considered.

Abstract

This study inquires into the Yeon-cheon(淵泉) Hong Seok-ju(洪奭周)'s criticism of poetry in the aspect of the poetic nature, versification, and function. About the poetic nature, it is based on the innate nature and emotion(性情) - poet's poetic consciousness, and then originate from the cheon-ki(天機) as the realization of the truth of space, reason of nature, and world's duty. About the versification, poetic meaning(意) must be expressed truly and frankly(眞摯), poetic words(辭) must be transferred logically and correctly(條達), and poetic spirit(氣) must be flowed and moved freely that not be blocked(流動). About the poetic function, poetic use(用) is impressing people(感人); poetic merit(功) is inspiring reader's heart, making them endeavor, encouraging the good and punishing the evil, and satiring the world(興勸懲創); poetic effect(效) is changing customs toward good way(移風易俗). In the future, there remain comparing and examining criticism of poetry of Hong Seok-ju and China. Also, it is thought that how Hong Seok-ju's criticism of poetry is applied to actual criticism must be considered.

참고문헌 (35)

  1. 金祖淳, "楓皐集"
  2. 尹鳳朝, "圃巖集"
  3. 金昌協, "農巖集"
  4. 尹春年, "詩法原流體意聲三字註解"
  5. 南公轍, "金陵集"
  6. 李奎報, "白雲小說"
  7. 南有容, "雷淵集"
  8. 李宜顯, "陶谷集"
  9. 謝榛, "四溟詩話"
  10. 李瀷, "星湖先生全集"
  11. 徐居正, "東人詩話"
  12. 丁若鏞, "與猶堂全書"
  13. 嚴羽, "滄浪詩話"
  14. 崔滋, "補閑集"
  15. 吳載純, "醇庵集"
  16. 洪奭周, "淵泉集"
  17. 柳夢寅, "於于野談"
  18. 洪奭周, "鶴岡散筆"
  19. 劉攽, "中山詩話"
  20. 洪良浩, "耳溪集"
  21. 劉勰, "文心雕龍"
  22. 강석중, "홍석주의 『학강산필』에 나타난 문학관에 대하여", 한국학논집, 37 (2003), 한양대 한국학연구소
  23. 권오순, "연천 홍석주의 한시 연구", 한문고전연구, 6 (2000), 한국한문고전학회
  24. 琴東?, "19세기 전반기 散文 理論의 전개 양상과 그 의미", 동방한문학, 25, pp.301~336 (2003), 동방한문학회
  25. 김철범, "연천 홍석주의 고문론", 한국한문학연구, 12 (1989), 한국한문학회
  26. 김철범, "홍석주 고문의 예술적 특징", 한국한문학연구, 22 (1998), 한국한문학회
  27. 박재경, "홍석주의 학문 경향과 문학론", 석사, pp.2003
  28. 임종욱, "연천 홍석주론. in: 조선 후기 한시 작가론 2" (1998), 이회문화사
  29. 임종욱, "홍석주의 『학강산필』에 나타난 문학론 연구", 한국문학연구, 21 (1999), 동국대 한국문학연구소
  30. 정대림, "홍석주의 <원시>에 대하여", 한문학논집, 10 (1992), 단국한문학회
  31. 정대림, "한국고전비평사" (2001), 태학사
  32. 정민, "연천 홍석주의 학문 정신과 고문론", 한국학논집, 16 (1989), 한양대 한국학연구소
  33. 정요일, "천기의 개념과 천기론의 의의. in: 한문학의 논리" (2009), 일조각
  34. 최신호, "연천 홍석주의 문학관", 동양학, 13 (1983), 단국대 동양학연구소
  35. 최신호, "홍석주의 <원시>에 있어서 시발어정의 문제", 한국한문학연구, 19 (1996), 한국한문학회

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (10건)