漢詩에서의 用事 활용 양상 연구- 성공적인 用事의 요건에 대하여
A Study on Usages of Yongsa in Classical Chinese Poetry
0
조회
0
다운로드
9
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
"Yongsa[用事]" means a method of composition that quotes or modifies former text's event, knowledge, assertion, the method of formation, and makes them as part of the text. Some critics insisted that yongsa is not good method for composing poetry because it looks like not deferring from plagiarism. But yongsa is one of the effective rhetorics in composing poetry. For making use of good yongsa, poets must have considered some requisites below:Firstly, poets must have chosen authentic precedent that has appropriate elements of the situation and condition of composing, e.g. characters, events, backgrounds, materials and so on. The more similarities exist between original text and poets' own creations, the more literary values can be made. Secundo, poets must have recombined the poetic words of source in a new way. But the recombination must not cause a distortion of the original meaning of source. Choosing appropriate authentic precedent is more important than making new coinage. Thirdly, poets must have considered the amount of yongsa. They can have showed off their extensive knowledges by using a lot of yongsa, but also must have been careful not to break off the logical connections of poetic ideas because improper yongsa sometimes can make the text very puzzling.
Abstract
"Yongsa[用事]" means a method of composition that quotes or modifies former text's event, knowledge, assertion, the method of formation, and makes them as part of the text. Some critics insisted that yongsa is not good method for composing poetry because it looks like not deferring from plagiarism. But yongsa is one of the effective rhetorics in composing poetry. For making use of good yongsa, poets must have considered some requisites below:Firstly, poets must have chosen authentic precedent that has appropriate elements of the situation and condition of composing, e.g. characters, events, backgrounds, materials and so on. The more similarities exist between original text and poets' own creations, the more literary values can be made. Secundo, poets must have recombined the poetic words of source in a new way. But the recombination must not cause a distortion of the original meaning of source. Choosing appropriate authentic precedent is more important than making new coinage. Thirdly, poets must have considered the amount of yongsa. They can have showed off their extensive knowledges by using a lot of yongsa, but also must have been careful not to break off the logical connections of poetic ideas because improper yongsa sometimes can make the text very puzzling.
참고문헌 (15)
- 崔滋, "補閑集" (1972), 亞細亞文化社
- 蘇軾, "蘇軾詩集" (1982), 中華書局
- 南龍翼, "箕雅" (1980), 아세아문화사
- 여운필, "역주 목은시고 1 영인" (2000)
- 許捲洙, "原文 詩話叢林" (1993), 까치
- 黃庭堅, "山谷詩集注 上" (2003), 上海古籍出版社
- 具本鉉, "한국 제화시의 특징과 전개", 동방한문학, (33), pp.263~302 (2007), 동방한문학회
- 구본현, "用事의 개념과 범주에 대한 재검토", 국문학연구, (19), pp.139~169 (2009), 국문학회
- 김성룡, "典範 학습과 중세의 문학교육", 문학교육학, (1), pp.255~292 (1997), 한국문학교육학회
- 宋載邵, "漢詩 用事의 比喩的 機能", 韓國漢文學硏究, 8, pp.291~310 (1985), 韓國漢文學會
- 呂運弼, "李穡의 詩文學 硏究", 박사, pp.1993
- 李鍾默, "海東江西詩派硏究" (1995), 太學社
- 李鍾默, "고전시가에서 用事와 點化의 미적 특질", 韓國詩歌硏究, 3, pp.323~345 (1998), 韓國詩歌學會
- 鄭堯一, "點化·蹈襲·換骨奪胎·點鐵成金의 槪念 硏究", 漢文敎育硏究, (10), pp.329~338 (1996), 한국한문교육학회
- 王琳祥, "解讀蘇東坡‘河東獅子吼’", 歷史月刊, 193, pp.127~132 (2004)
