한시 이론인 用事와 點化의 주체적 수용

Abstract

This study examined the difference between Yongsa and Jeomhwa and their traditional succession through Korean poetry, Sijo, Gasa, and modern poetry. Their subjective acceptance was also examined. Yongsa is quoting phrases from old texts and scriptures to give them new meanings, whereas Jeomhwa is adopting phrases with their original meanings, but changing the meanings at a certain point to give them new meanings. Yongsa and Jeomhwa were Korean poetry writing techniques, but also used for Sijo and Gasa during the Joseon Dynasty. It was examined whether the techniques of Yongsa and Jeomhwa are traditionally succeeded and used to write modern poetry. In result, it was found that Yoon Dong Joo's <Seosi> and Jeong Hee Seong's <Washing My Shovel in the Fallen River> used Yongsa to quote the scriptures of Mencius and Confucius. Also, Yi Sang Hwa's <Does Spring Come to Plundered Fields>, Jeong Ji Yong's <Nostalgia>, and Yi Soo Bok's <Spring Shower> adopted Jeomhwa. Some modern literature researchers have compared Yongsa and parody or Jeomhwa and parody, but neither Yongsa nor Jeomhwa can be compared with parody because they have completely different concepts to parody. Therefore, Yongsa and Jeomhwa should not be analyzed by comparing them with parody, a western literature theory. Parody can be adopted for Korean literature and Yongsa and Jeomhwa should be succeeded as traditional literature theories. Doing so would enrich the literature theories of Korea.