해외 선진국 규정 분석을 통한 국내 정부품질보증 효율성 향상 방안
Improving Government Quality Assurance Efficiency by Analyzing Related Instructions of Advanced Countries
2
조회
0
다운로드
4
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose: Defense government agencies in the world continuously try to improve operational efficiency in government quality assurance activities. The purpose of this paper is to propose some suggestions to enhance efficiency of government quality assurance (GQA) activities based on the analysis of the current quality assurance methods of advanced foreign agencies such as DCMA and NATO. Methods: In order to propose new directions, reviews and analyses are executed. (1) Former research results in Korea for enhancing GQA are reviewed, and their limitations are addressed. (2) Updated policies and procedures of the US DCMA and NATO are reviewed and their advantages are presented. (3) Current GQA policies and procedures are contrasted with those of US DCMA and NATO. Results: Suggestions for efficient Korean GQA activities are given in several aspects: GQA paradigm shift, clarification of GQA methods, facility-wide GQA, risk management for suppliers, counterfeit mitigation policy, data collection and control. Conclusion: Reviews on the government quality assurance policies and procedures of DTaQ, DCMA, and NATO are executed and compared with each other. The results of this research are expected to be useful guidelines to improve GQA policies and procedures in Korea, making it possible to realize more efficient GQA activities in Korea.
Abstract
Purpose: Defense government agencies in the world continuously try to improve operational efficiency in government quality assurance activities. The purpose of this paper is to propose some suggestions to enhance efficiency of government quality assurance (GQA) activities based on the analysis of the current quality assurance methods of advanced foreign agencies such as DCMA and NATO. Methods: In order to propose new directions, reviews and analyses are executed. (1) Former research results in Korea for enhancing GQA are reviewed, and their limitations are addressed. (2) Updated policies and procedures of the US DCMA and NATO are reviewed and their advantages are presented. (3) Current GQA policies and procedures are contrasted with those of US DCMA and NATO. Results: Suggestions for efficient Korean GQA activities are given in several aspects: GQA paradigm shift, clarification of GQA methods, facility-wide GQA, risk management for suppliers, counterfeit mitigation policy, data collection and control. Conclusion: Reviews on the government quality assurance policies and procedures of DTaQ, DCMA, and NATO are executed and compared with each other. The results of this research are expected to be useful guidelines to improve GQA policies and procedures in Korea, making it possible to realize more efficient GQA activities in Korea.
참고문헌 (18)
- 안남수, "군수품 제품확인감사 기준정립을 위한 제언", 품질경영학회지, 43(3), pp.327~340 (2015), 한국품질경영학회[DOI]
- 안남수, "위험관리기반의 군수품 품질보증업무 변화를 위한 제언", 한국산학기술학회논문지, 16(9), pp.5914~5923 (2015), 한국산학기술학회[DOI]
- Government Contract Quality Assurance (GCQA)Surveillance Planning, "Defense Contract Management Agency(DCMA)", ~, pp.DCMA-INST 309 (2013)
- Defense Contract Management Agency(DCMA), "Process Review-QA DCMA-INST 311", ~ (2013)
- Defense Contract Management Agency(DCMA), "Product Examination DCMA-INST 324", ~ (2013)
- Defense Contract Management Agency(DCMA)., "Data Collection and Analysis DCMA-INST 323", ~ (2015)
- Defense Contract Management Agency(DCMA)., "Counterfeit Mitigation DCMA-INST 1205", ~ (2015)
- "DCMA policy lists" (2017)[URL]
- "Introduction to DCMA" (2017)[URL]
- "Military Supplies Quality Management Basic Regulation" (2016)[URL]
- Defense Agency for Technology and Quality(DTaQ), "Organization Journal Summer", ~ (2017)
- Counterfeit Parts : DoD needs to improve reporting and oversight to reduce supply chain risk, "Government Accountability Office(GAO)", ~ (2016)
- Kim, Y. S., "Defense Quality Management" (2010), Hyungseul Press
- NATO Standardization Office(NSO), "NATO Mutual Government Quality Assurance(GQA)Edition B, Version 3", ~ (2015)
- "North Atlantic Treaty Organization(NATO)" (2017)[URL]
- "Public Procurement Service of Korea homepage" (2017)[URL]
- 신병철, "생산수량이 한정된 신제품의 품질수준 평가를 위한 샘플링검사 방법 : 개발단계 유도무기를 중심으로", 대한산업공학회지, 41(5), pp.481~487 (2015), 대한산업공학회[DOI]
- 신병철, "양산단계 군수품에 대한 정부품질보증활동 실효성 향상 방안", 품질경영학회지, 44(1), pp.153~166 (2016), 한국품질경영학회[DOI]