초도양산 군수품에 대한 정량적 위험등급평가 방안 연구
A study on the quantitative risk grade assessment of initial mass production for weapon systems
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to study quantitative risk grade assessment for objective government quality assurance activities based on risk management in initial mass production for weapon systems. Methods: The Defense quality management regulations and foreign risk assessment documents are referred to analyze problems performing quality assurance actives. The failure rate data, maintainability and cost of products have been studied to quantify the risk Likelihood and impact. The analyzed data were classified as risk grade assessment through K-means Cluster Analysis method. Results: Results show that a proposed method can objectively evaluate risk grade. The analyzed results are clustered into three levels such as high, middle and low. Two products are allocated high, eleven low and seven middle. Conclusion: In this paper, quantitative risk grade assessment methods were presented by analyzing risk ratings based on objective data. The findings showed that the methods would be effective for initial mass production for weapon systems.
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to study quantitative risk grade assessment for objective government quality assurance activities based on risk management in initial mass production for weapon systems. Methods: The Defense quality management regulations and foreign risk assessment documents are referred to analyze problems performing quality assurance actives. The failure rate data, maintainability and cost of products have been studied to quantify the risk Likelihood and impact. The analyzed data were classified as risk grade assessment through K-means Cluster Analysis method. Results: Results show that a proposed method can objectively evaluate risk grade. The analyzed results are clustered into three levels such as high, middle and low. Two products are allocated high, eleven low and seven middle. Conclusion: In this paper, quantitative risk grade assessment methods were presented by analyzing risk ratings based on objective data. The findings showed that the methods would be effective for initial mass production for weapon systems.
참고문헌 (20)
- 안남수, "군수품 제품확인감사 기준정립을 위한 제언", 품질경영학회지, 43(3), pp.327~340 (2015), 한국품질경영학회[DOI]
- 백용관, "함정 분야의 RAM분석 기반 위험평가 방안", 품질경영학회지, 43(4), pp.511~520 (2015), 한국품질경영학회[DOI]
- DAPA Instruction, "MRA Instruction. 218" (2014)
- Defense Agency for Technology and Quality(DTAQ), "Defense Quality Management Regulations" (2017)
- Department of defense. Defense Acquisition University, "Risk Management guide for DOD Acquisition", ~ (2003)
- Ebeling, C. E., "An Introduction to Reliability and Maintainability Engineering" (1997), McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
- Emre, Celebi., "A comparative study of efficient initialization methods for the k-means clustering algorithm", Expert Systems with Applications, 40(2013), pp.200~210 (2013)[DOI]
- Erioli, Andrea, "K-means Cluster Analysis and Mahalanobis Metrics: a problematic match or an overlooked opportunity", Statistica Applicata, 17, pp.61~73 (2005)
- Finkelstein, Maxim, "Introduction Failure Rate Modelling for Reliability and Risk. Springer Series in Reliability Engineering", pp.1~84 (2008)
- "ISO 31000, Risk Management Principles and Guidelines", ~ (2018)
- Kim, Y.S., "Introduction to Defense Quality Management", pp.101~116 (2010), Hyungseul
- 이창희, "FMEA를 활용한 군수품 초도 생산 및 양산 단계의 위험 식별 방안 연구", 품질경영학회지, 42(3), pp.311~324 (2014), 한국품질경영학회[DOI]
- Lee, G.H., "A Study on Clustering Methods", pp.1997
- 이지혁, "제조성숙도평가 MRL8 평가 방법론에 관한 연구", 한국산학기술학회논문지, 18(6), pp.609~619 (2017), 한국산학기술학회[DOI]
- "MIL-STD-882D, Risk Management Guide for DoD Acquisition", ~ (2000)
- 서명교, "군집기반 열간조압연설비 상태모니터링과 진단", 품질경영학회지, 45(1), pp.25~38 (2017), 한국품질경영학회[DOI]
- 신상식, "확률 기반의 위험등급평가 객관화 방안", 품질경영학회지, 41(3), pp.465~474 (2013), 한국품질경영학회[DOI]
- U.S. Department of Defense, "MIL-HDBK-338B. Reliability Modeling and Prediction : Electronic Reliability Design Handbook" (1998)
- Yoo, H.S., "RAM analysis Report on ADC2A, ADD, ADC2A-RAMR V5.0", ~ (2017)
- A Study on systematic performance of risk identification, risk assessment and risk treatment, "Yoon, J.B.", DTAQ, 12~26 (2016)