국방규격 개선사업의 성과평가모형 개발 및 적용방안 연구
A Study on the Development and Application of Performance Evaluation Model for Defense Standard Improvement Projects
1
조회
0
다운로드
4
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose: The purpose of this study is to identify key performance evaluation items and factors that are effective and practical for project management of defense standard standard improvement projects, and to develop a quantitative performance evaluation model. Methods: For the development of a performance evaluation model for defense standard improvement projects, we analyzed past major project performance and derived evaluation items and factors. To increase the objectivity and efficiency of project evaluation, we developed an evaluation index that enables relative evaluation of evaluation targets, and calculated the main importance of evaluation items using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) method based on the main opinions of expert groups. Results: The study resulted in the identification of main performance items for defense standard improvement projects, which were classified into defense standard conformity review performance and defense standard improvement performance items. We also simplified the evaluation model by integrating various evaluation items into similar evaluation factors. Additionally, we developed a quantitative evaluation index that enables relative evaluation of the targets and verified the objectivity and validity of the suggested performance evaluation model by reevaluating it using performance data from past commissioned professional institutions Conclusion: Developing a quantitative evaluation model for defense standard improvement projects is expected to provide a means of measuring the effectiveness of the project, and to be used as a tool to determine the appropriateness and effectiveness of medium and long-term project plans.
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study is to identify key performance evaluation items and factors that are effective and practical for project management of defense standard standard improvement projects, and to develop a quantitative performance evaluation model. Methods: For the development of a performance evaluation model for defense standard improvement projects, we analyzed past major project performance and derived evaluation items and factors. To increase the objectivity and efficiency of project evaluation, we developed an evaluation index that enables relative evaluation of evaluation targets, and calculated the main importance of evaluation items using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) method based on the main opinions of expert groups. Results: The study resulted in the identification of main performance items for defense standard improvement projects, which were classified into defense standard conformity review performance and defense standard improvement performance items. We also simplified the evaluation model by integrating various evaluation items into similar evaluation factors. Additionally, we developed a quantitative evaluation index that enables relative evaluation of the targets and verified the objectivity and validity of the suggested performance evaluation model by reevaluating it using performance data from past commissioned professional institutions Conclusion: Developing a quantitative evaluation model for defense standard improvement projects is expected to provide a means of measuring the effectiveness of the project, and to be used as a tool to determine the appropriateness and effectiveness of medium and long-term project plans.
참고문헌 (24)
- "standardization work regulations" (2022)[URL]
- Defense Agency for Technology and Quality, "Defense Standardization Guidebook", 94~ (2020)
- Defense Agency for Technology and Quality., "Defense Standards Improvement Work Guidebook", ~ (2021)
- 전수연, "민간 신기술의 국방 분야 도입방안에 대한 연구", 한국산학기술학회논문지, 21(5), pp.249~256 (2020), 한국산학기술학회[DOI]
- 정지선, "군수분야 표준화업무 발전방안", 품질경영학회지, 40(3), pp.295~305 (2012), 한국품질경영학회[DOI]
- 정영권, "국방품질성숙도지수의 개발 및 평가에 관한 연구", 품질경영학회지, 47(3), pp.479~496 (2019), 한국품질경영학회[DOI]
- 정현우, "군수품 형상통제업무 발전방안에 관한 연구", 한국산학기술학회논문지, 21(6), pp.70~77 (2020), 한국산학기술학회[DOI]
- 정현우, "부품단종에 대한 조사⋅분석 및 관리방안", 한국산학기술학회논문지, 21(5), pp.257~265 (2020), 한국산학기술학회[DOI]
- 정현우, "무기체계 부품 표준화를 위한 부품관리 방안", 한국산학기술학회논문지, 22(2), pp.409~417 (2021), 한국산학기술학회[DOI]
- 정일호, "무기체계 개발단계 품질관리 강화에 관한 사례 연구", 품질경영학회지, 45(3), pp.349~364 (2017), 한국품질경영학회[DOI]
- 김일중, "중소 제조기업의 경쟁력 강화를 위한 제조AI 핵심 정책과제 도출에 관한 연구", 품질경영학회지, 50(4), pp.647~664 (2022), 한국품질경영학회[DOI]
- 김판준, "학술지 영향력 측정을 위한 h-지수의 응용에 관한 연구", 정보관리학회지, 27(1), pp.269~287 (2010), 한국정보관리학회[DOI]
- 김영현, "국방품질경영체제(DQMS) 정량평가모델 개발 및 제도화 방안 연구", 품질경영학회지, 50(2), pp.183~197 (2022), 한국품질경영학회[DOI]
- Korea Institute of Procurement., "Analysis of the effectiveness of defense standard improvement projects and research on project improvement measure", ~ (2022)
- 곽현, "특허분석을 통한 인공지능 기술 분야 경쟁력 분석:특허 시장성과 기술력 질적 분석을 중심으로", 정보시스템연구, 28(3), pp.141~158 (2019), 한국정보시스템학회
- 이강경, "무기체계 운용시험평가 개선전략 도출 및 우선순위 결정", 융합보안 논문지, 21(1), pp.177~189 (2021), 한국융합보안학회
- 박경철, "국방분야 인용 원·부자재 규격", 표준 개정 효율화 연구, 2018, pp.46(3), 497~508[DOI]
- 박경환, "전기전자 시험인증기관의 글로벌 경쟁력 요인 연구", 품질경영학회지, 49(3), pp.281~297 (2021), 한국품질경영학회[DOI]
- 서창원, "AHP를 활용한 디자인 콘셉트의 창의성 평가에 관한 연구", 품질경영학회지, 44(4), pp.855~868 (2016), 한국품질경영학회[DOI]
- 서준혁, "AHP를 활용한 안전한 제품을 공급하기 위한 기업의 전략적 실행방안", 품질경영학회지, 50(4), pp.635~646 (2022), 한국품질경영학회[DOI]
- 서상원, "AHP 분석을 통한 군수품 장비류 감액 중요도 산출", 품질경영학회지, 44(3), pp.473~486 (2016), 한국품질경영학회[DOI]
- 손은일, "AHP를 이용한 정부출연연구소 평가 모형 연구", 품질경영학회지, 50(4), pp.665~677 (2022), 한국품질경영학회[DOI]
- 원준호, "방산 중소기업에 적용 가능한 유망수출품목 선정모형에 관한 연구", 한국산학기술학회논문지, 21(7), pp.321~330 (2020), 한국산학기술학회[DOI]
- 윤일웅, "국방기술기획 대상 무기체계 선정 지표에 관한 연구", 한국산학기술학회논문지, 23(7), pp.170~176 (2022), 한국산학기술학회[DOI]