본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

행정개혁의 역사와 모형

History and Model of Administrative Reform

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류사회학

초록

행정개혁의 역사와 모형을 종단 및 횡단적 견지에서 검토하는 일은 현실 행정 의 개선은 물론 행정학의 체계화와 직결된 문제이다. 이에 본 연구는 행정개혁의 역사를 르네상스와 종교개혁 및 중상주의를 토대로 출현한 서유럽의 절대국가, 산업혁명과 정당정치를 기반으로 하는 영미의 입법국가 그리고 20세기를 전후해 적극적인 정부상을 표방한 현대 행정국가로 구분한 상태에서 각기 행정개혁의 주요한 추진계기와 제기된 문제점에 대한 처방책으로 제시된 행정개혁의 기반이 론들을 비교역사적 견지에서 검토하였다. 또한 횡단적 견지에서 현재 각국의 행 정개혁을 위해 경합하고 있는 행정개혁의 모형들을 시장모형, 참여모형, 조직모 형, 관리모형으로 구분한 상태에서, 각각의 모형이 내포하고 있는 기본적인 논지 를 정부실패의 원인, 개혁에 대한 처방, 해당 접근방법이 가진 한계와 비판 등을 중심으로 살펴보았다.

Abstract

This paper aims to provide a systemic framework in understanding the practices which have historically been made in reforming public administration. For this purpose, this paper examines the history and model of administrative reform through a comparative historical perspective, and in turn, attempts to reveal the contexts and logics of administrative reform vertically and horizontally. In the first part of this paper, we analyze the major drives into administrative reform and theoretical grounds for it which can be put in relation to each different historical institutional experiences, which were brought by: (1) the absolute state based on the Renaissance and Reformation thought in Western Europe, (2) the constitutional state accompanied with the Industrial Revolution and party politics in Britain and the U.S., and (3) the contemporary administrative state with leading role of public administration in the 20th century. Secondly, by establishing a four-dimensional typology showing different viewpoints on the cause of government failure, the major prescriptions and logics toward administrative reform, we give rise to such contending four alternative models as: (1) market model, (2) participatory model, (3) organizational model, (4) managerial model. Lastly, we briefly discuss on some implications from these models and historical observations in terms of enhancing the public relevance of the current efforts for administrative reform.

참고문헌 (24)

  1. 김정렬, "행정개혁론: 국제비교와 실증분석" (2008), 박영사
  2. 이도형, "행정학의 샘물" (2006), 선학사
  3. 참여정부의 정부혁신: 이론적 접근, "정부혁신지방분권위원회", ~ (2007)
  4. 정용덕, "미국의 국가이념과 행정개혁", 행정논총, 41(4), pp.1~22 (2003), 한국행정연구소
  5. 정정길, "작은정부론" (2007), 부키
  6. 한인섭, "정부관료제의 본질과 기업적 거버넌스의 한계", 한국행정연구, 13(3), pp.3~26 (2004), 한국행정연구원
  7. Barzelay, Michael, "The New Public Management: Improving Research and Policy Dialogue" (2001), Russell Sage Foundation. University of California Press
  8. Bekke, Hans A. G. M., "Civil Service System in Western Europe: Civil Service Systems in Comparative Perspective" (2000), Edward Elgar
  9. Bowornwathana, Bidhya, "Transforming Bureaucracies for the 21st Century: The New Democratic Governance Paradigm", Public Administration Quarterly, 21 (1997)
  10. Colin, Pilkinton, "The Civil Service in Britain Today" (1999), Manchester University Press
  11. Considene, Mark, "Governance at Ground Level: The Frontline Bureaucrat in the Age of Markets and Networks", Public Administration Review, 59(6) (1999)
  12. DeLeon, Linda, "The Political Theory of Reinvention", Public Administration Review, 60(2) (2000)
  13. Hughes, Owen E., "Public Management & Administration: An Introduction" (2003), Palgrave Macmillan
  14. Kettl, Donald F., "The Global Public Management Revolution: A Report on the Transformation of Governance" (2000), Brookings Institution Press
  15. Morgan, David R., "The Two Face of Privatization", Public Administration Review, 58(6) (1988)
  16. Ott, Attiat F., "Privatization and Economic Efficiency: A Comparative Analysis of Developed and Developing Countries" (1991), E. Elgar Pub
  17. Peters, B. Guy, "The Politics of Bureaucracy" (2001), Routledge
  18. Peters, B. Guy, "The Future of Governing: Four Emerging Models" (1996), Kansas Univ. Press
  19. Raadschelders J. C. N., "The Evolution of Civil Service Systems, In Civil Service System in Comparative Perspective", pp.67~100 (1996), Indiana University Press
  20. Rhodes, R.A.W., "The New Governance: Governing Without Government", Political Studies, 44(4), pp.652~667 (1996)
  21. Schultz, David A., "The Politics of Civil Service Reform" (1998), Peter Lang Publishing
  22. Scott, James C., "Comparative Political Corruption" (1972), Prentice-Hall Inc
  23. Starr, Paul, "The Limits of Privatization" (1987), Economic Policy Institute
  24. Morgan, David R., "The Two Faces of Privatization", Public Administration Review, 48(6), pp.979~987 (1988)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (5건)