스페인어의 존재 구문에 관한 연구
A Study on the existential construction in Spanish
2
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
One of the most common verbs in Spanish is HABER that use different ways from the other Spanish verbs in various aspects. One peculiarity of the existential verb HABER is that it has a unique conjugated form (in the 3 singular) HAY (the present tense conjugation of the verb HABER) that means both "there is" and "there are." Compared with other Spanish verbs (existential), the verb HABER only uses the morpheme Y in the present. Like the existential construction in French, the verb HABER does not agree with the Associate. According to Hornstein, Rosen & Uriagereka (1994), in these constructions exist the semantic ambiguity. However, the constructions with the verb ESTAR in Spanish do not show this ambiguity. The purpose of this paper is to descriptively analyze the typical properties of sentences with the verb HABER, and to suggest a revised analysis of the constructions mentioned. In this study, I propose that the existential verb HABER and the copula SER are derived from the same construction. And I suppose that the difference between the verb HABER and the copula SER lies in the properties of the Predicate. In the concrete, the existential verb HABER contains the process of the incorporation (of the morpheme Y) to the head Cop(ula).
Abstract
One of the most common verbs in Spanish is HABER that use different ways from the other Spanish verbs in various aspects. One peculiarity of the existential verb HABER is that it has a unique conjugated form (in the 3 singular) HAY (the present tense conjugation of the verb HABER) that means both "there is" and "there are." Compared with other Spanish verbs (existential), the verb HABER only uses the morpheme Y in the present. Like the existential construction in French, the verb HABER does not agree with the Associate. According to Hornstein, Rosen & Uriagereka (1994), in these constructions exist the semantic ambiguity. However, the constructions with the verb ESTAR in Spanish do not show this ambiguity. The purpose of this paper is to descriptively analyze the typical properties of sentences with the verb HABER, and to suggest a revised analysis of the constructions mentioned. In this study, I propose that the existential verb HABER and the copula SER are derived from the same construction. And I suppose that the difference between the verb HABER and the copula SER lies in the properties of the Predicate. In the concrete, the existential verb HABER contains the process of the incorporation (of the morpheme Y) to the head Cop(ula).
참고문헌 (30)
- 서소영, "Aproximación minimista al estudio de las diversas formas copulativas: el verbo copulativo SER, el verbo posesivo TENER y la preposición débil DE", 박사, pp.1999
- 서소영, "계사구문들에서 명사구 이동에 관하여", 서어서문연구, 16, pp.71~101 (2000)
- 서소영, "EVENT 구문의 인지과정에 관한 연구- 스페인어 자료를 중심으로 -", 언어과학연구, 1(30), pp.41~68 (2004), 언어과학회
- 서소영, "Studies of the Movement of the D-feature in Spanish", 언어학, 12(3), pp.239~255 (2004), 대한언어학회
- Benveniste,E, "Problèmes de linguistique générale" (1966), Gallimard
- Chomsky,N, "Some Notes on Economy of Derivation and Representation", MIT Working Papers in Linguistics, 10, pp.43~74 (1989)
- Chomsky,N, "Minimalist Inquiries", MIT Working Papers in Linguistics, 15, pp.1~61 (1998)
- Den Dikken,M, "Copulars", GLOW, 34, pp.20~21 (1995)
- Den Dikken,M, "The Syntax of Possession and the Verb HAVE", Lingua, 101, pp.129~150 (1997)
- individual Distinction, in: From Words To Discourse: Trends in Spanish Semantics and Pragmatics, "Coercion and the Stage", pp.2002, Escandell-Vidal, V
- Freeze,R, "Existentials and other Locatives", Language, 68, pp.553~595 (1992)
- Guéron,J, "Le verbe AVOIR", Recherches Linguistiques de Vincennes, (14-15), pp.155~186 (1986)
- Guéron,J, "Types syntaxiques et types sémantiques: La phrase copulative comme PALIMPSESTE", Revue Québécoise de Linguistique, 22, pp.77~114 (1992)
- Harley,H, "Events, Agents and the Interpretation of VP-shells", 석사, pp.1996
- Hornstein, N. Rosen, S. & Uriagereka, J, "Integrals", 석사, pp.1994
- Kratzer,A, "Stage-Level and Individual-Level Predicates, in: Papers on Quantification" (1988), University of Massachusetts
- Laka,I, "Negation in Syntax: on the Nature of Functional Categories and Projections", 박사, pp.1990
- Lyons,J, "A Note on Possessive, Existential, and Locative Sentences", Foundations of Language, 3, pp.300~396 (1967)
- Lyons,J, "Existence, Location, Possession and Transitivity, in: Logic, Methodology, and Philosophy of Science", pp.495~509 (1968), North-Holland
- Moro,A, "The Raising of Predicates: Copula, Expletives and Existence", MIT Working Papers in Linguistics, 15, pp.119~181 (1991)
- Moro,A, "I Predicati Nominali e la Struttura della Frase" (1993), Unipress
- Muromatsu,K, "Two Types of Existentials: Evidence from Japanese", Lingua, 101, pp.245~269 (1997)
- Nash,L, "On BE and HAVE in Georgian", MIT Working Papers in Linguistics, 22, pp.153~171 (1994)
- Ouhalla,J, "Sentential Negation, Relativized Minimality and the Aspectual Status of Auxiliaries", The Linguistic Review, 7, pp.183~231 (1990)
- Pollock,J.Y, "Verb Movement, Universal Grammar, and the Structure of IP", Linguistic Inquiry, 20, pp.365~424 (1989)
- Rapoport,T.R, "Copular, Nominals and Small Clauses: A Study of Israeli Hebrew", 박사, pp.1987
- Ritter, E, "Causative HAVE", NELS, 21, pp.323~336 (1991)
- Ritter, E, "Deriving Causation", Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 11, pp.519~555 (1993)
- Ritter, E, "The Function of HAVE", Lingua, 101, pp.295~321 (1997)
- Uriagereka,J, "From BEING to HAVING: Questions about Ontology from a Kayne", Szabolcsi Syntax, University of Maryland, 1997