An RRG Account of English Double Object Construction and Dative Construction
2
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of this paper is to investigate English double object construction and dative construction in terms of Role and Reference Grammar [RRG], with some reference to corresponding Korean constructions. In this paper, it is argued that the double object construction and the dative construction in English both involve the asymmetric (i.e., non-neutral alignment) structures typologically. The asymmetric structures are claimed to support the claim that the linking algorithm in RRG should be regarded as a lexical approach, and should reflect the different meanings in the Logical Structures. It is also claimed that beneficiary applicative mechanisms are employed to account for the marked undergoer selection of non-core arguments in English double object construction. Furthermore, it is shown that the same asymmetric structures should be posited for English beneficiary applicatives. It is also argued that there should be a single undergoer in English clause. This claim is naturally associated with the asymmetric structures for the double object construction.
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to investigate English double object construction and dative construction in terms of Role and Reference Grammar [RRG], with some reference to corresponding Korean constructions. In this paper, it is argued that the double object construction and the dative construction in English both involve the asymmetric (i.e., non-neutral alignment) structures typologically. The asymmetric structures are claimed to support the claim that the linking algorithm in RRG should be regarded as a lexical approach, and should reflect the different meanings in the Logical Structures. It is also claimed that beneficiary applicative mechanisms are employed to account for the marked undergoer selection of non-core arguments in English double object construction. Furthermore, it is shown that the same asymmetric structures should be posited for English beneficiary applicatives. It is also argued that there should be a single undergoer in English clause. This claim is naturally associated with the asymmetric structures for the double object construction.
참고문헌 (26)
- Baker, M, "Incorporation" (1988), Chicago University
- Bowers,J, "The syntax of predication", Linguistic Inquiry, 24, pp.591~656 (1993)
- Bresnan J, "Object asymmetries in comparative Bantu syntax", Linguistic Inquiry, 21, pp.147~185 (1990)
- Bresnan, J, "Reality exploration and discovery: Pattern interaction in language and life", pp.1~23 (2008), CSLI Publications
- Downing, A, "A university course in English grammar" (2006), Routledge
- Dryer,M, "Primary objects, secondary objects, and antidative", Language, 62, pp.808~845 (1986)
- Dryer,M, "Language typology and syntactic description 1", pp.223~275 (2007), CUP
- Goldberg,A, "The inherent semantics of argument structure,In The case of the English ditransitive construction", Cognitive Linguistics, 3, pp.37~74 (1992)
- Goldberg,A, "A construction grammar approach to argument structure" (1995), The University of Chicago
- Gropen, J, "The learnability and acquisition of the dative alternation in English", Language, 65, pp.203~257 (1989)
- Hale, K, "Prolegomenon to a theory of argument structure" (2002), MIT
- Harley, H, "Possession and the double object construction", Linguistic Variation Yearbook, 2, pp.31~70 (2002)
- Haspelmath,M, "The world atlas of language structures", pp.426~429 (2005), OUP
- Haspelmath,M, "Investigations of the syntax semantics pragmatics interface", pp.75~100 (2008), John Benjamins
- Heine, B, "On the linear order of ditransitive objects", Sciences, 32, pp.87~131 (2010)
- 전종섭, "Lexical Derivation of Triadic Dative Verbs in English", 담화와 인지, 13(3), pp.189~207 (2006), 담화·인지언어학회
- Jeon,Y, "The landscape of applicatives", 박사, pp.2006
- Langacker,R, "Cognitive linguistics: Basic readings", pp.29~68 (2006), Mounton de Gruyter
- Larson,R, "On the double object construction", Linguistic Inquiry, 19, pp.335~392 (1988)
- Marantz,A, "Theoretical aspects of Bantu grammar", pp.113~150 (1993), CSLS
- Park,K, "The semantics and pragmatics of case marking in Korean,In A role and reference grammar account", 박사, pp.1995
- Pinker,S, "Learnability and cognition,In The acquisition of argument structure" (1989), MIT
- Polinsky,M, "Discourse and cognition,In Bridging the gap", pp.365~386 (1998), CSLI
- Shibatani,M, "English studies from Asian perspectives toward making original contributions", The English Language and Literature Association of Korea (1994)
- Van Valin,R, "Exploring the syntax semantics interface" (2005), Cambridge University
- Van Valin,R, "The role and reference grammar analysis of three place predicates", Suvremena Lingvistika, 33(1), pp.31~63 (2007)