영어와 한국어의 이중목적어구문
English and Korean Ditransive Construction
2
조회
0
다운로드
4
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The grammatical relationship between English double object construction and dative construction has received much attention among many linguists in the generative syntax for decades. Many researchers have tried to examine whether or not there is a rule that relates two constructions. In this paper, I challenge the transformational view of the Korean dative alternation, in which double object construction can be allowed when the light verb cwu-is affixed to dative verb. I analyze the grammatical relationship between Korean dative construction and double objects on the basis of Larsonian VP-Shell approach and Chomsky's light verb(v). It is well explained that there is an asymmetry between the goal dative construction and the benefactive dative construction if there is the light verb cwu base-generated on v in Korean. Through this cross-linguistic data, I expand the new approach to dative construction and double object construction.
Abstract
The grammatical relationship between English double object construction and dative construction has received much attention among many linguists in the generative syntax for decades. Many researchers have tried to examine whether or not there is a rule that relates two constructions. In this paper, I challenge the transformational view of the Korean dative alternation, in which double object construction can be allowed when the light verb cwu-is affixed to dative verb. I analyze the grammatical relationship between Korean dative construction and double objects on the basis of Larsonian VP-Shell approach and Chomsky's light verb(v). It is well explained that there is an asymmetry between the goal dative construction and the benefactive dative construction if there is the light verb cwu base-generated on v in Korean. Through this cross-linguistic data, I expand the new approach to dative construction and double object construction.
참고문헌 (25)
- 김선웅, "한국어 동사 인상과 공백화", 생성문법연구 (1998)
- 정주리, "주다 형식의 구문과 의미", 한국어 의미학, 19, pp.181~207 (2006), 한국어의미학회
- Aoun, J., "Scope and constituency", Linguistic Inquiry, 20, pp.141~172 (1989)
- Baker, Mark C., "Incorporation: A theory of grammatical function changing" (1988), University of Chicago Press
- Barss, A., "A note on Anaphora and double objects", Linguistic Inquiry, 17, pp.347~354 (1986)
- Beck, S, "Double object again", Linguistic Inquiry, 35, pp.97~124 (2004)
- Bruening, Benjamin, "Double object constructions disguised as prepositional datives", Linguistic Inquiry, 41(2), pp.287~305 (2010)
- Chomsky, Noam, "The Minimalist Program" (1995), MIT Press
- Harley, H, "Possession and Double object construction", The year book of linguistic variation, 2, pp.29~68 (2002), John Benjamins Publishing Company
- Emonds, Joseph, "Double Object Constructions. The Blackwell Companion to Syntax Volume II" (2006), Blackwell Publishing
- Gerdts, Donna, "Case stacking and focus in Korean, In Harvard studies in Korean linguistics VIII", pp.325~339 (1999)
- Grimshaw, J., "Light verbs and Ɵ-marking", Linguistic Inquiry, 19(2), pp.205~232 (1988)
- 정연진, "Decomposing Ditransitive Verbs", 한국생성문법학회, pp.97~116 (2004)
- Krifka, Manfred, "Semantic and Pragmatic conditions for the Dative Alternation", 영어학, 4(1), pp.1~31 (2004), 한국영어학회
- 이두원, "The English Dative Verbs vs. the Korean Dative Serial Verb Constructions", 영어영문학연구, 49(3), pp.235~255 (2007), 한국중앙영어영문학회
- Levin, Beth, "The English dative alternation: The case for verb sensitivity", J. Linguistics, 44, pp.129~167 (2008)
- Larson, R., "On the double object construction", Linguistic Inquiry, 19(3), pp.335~391 (1988)
- Mohanan, Tara, "Grammatical Verbs(with Special Reference to Light Verbs), The Blackwell Companion to Syntax Volume II" (2006), Blackwell Publishing
- Marzurkewich, I., "The acquisition of the dative alternation: unlearning overgeneralizations", Cognition, 16, pp.261~283 (1984)
- Radford, A., "Syntactic theory and the structure of English: A minimalist approach" (1997), Cambridge Univ. Press
- Richards, N., "An idiomatic argument for lexical decomposition", Linguistic Inquiry, 32, pp.183~193 (2001)
- Pesetsky, David, "Zero Syntax: Experiencers and Cascades" (1995), The MIT Press
- 샨렌, "On Ditransitive Constructions: A Neo-Transformational Approach", 언어연구, 25(3), pp.575~599 (2009), 한국현대언어학회
- Eykey: A postposition or a Case marker?, In Harvard studies in Korean linguistics IV, "Ey", pp.1991, Urushibara, Saeko
- Yoon, James H -S., "Korean Verbal Inflection and Checking Theory", MITWPL, 22 (1994)