본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

English Personal Dative Constructions and Applicative Theory

2

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류영어와문학

초록

The aim of the paper is twofold: firstly, to examine the properties of an applicative construction of English called the Personal Dative Construction (PDC) in comparison with another applicative construction, the standard Double Object Construction (DOC), and then to identify the semantics of the PDC by an application of lexical decomposition. Secondly, to argue that a variant of applicative theories like that advocated by Georgala et al. (2008) and Georgala (2012) is correct, whereas highly influential one such as Pylkkänen’s high/low applicative hypothesis cannot account for the properties of the PDC properly. This paper, thus, defends the view of Georgala in that applicative phrases cannot be generated below VP and uniformly appear above VP. It also shows that arguments can be shared between predicates and multiple thematic role assignment is possible.

Abstract

The aim of the paper is twofold: firstly, to examine the properties of an applicative construction of English called the Personal Dative Construction (PDC) in comparison with another applicative construction, the standard Double Object Construction (DOC), and then to identify the semantics of the PDC by an application of lexical decomposition. Secondly, to argue that a variant of applicative theories like that advocated by Georgala et al. (2008) and Georgala (2012) is correct, whereas highly influential one such as Pylkkänen’s high/low applicative hypothesis cannot account for the properties of the PDC properly. This paper, thus, defends the view of Georgala in that applicative phrases cannot be generated below VP and uniformly appear above VP. It also shows that arguments can be shared between predicates and multiple thematic role assignment is possible.

참고문헌 (38)

  1. Aoun, Joseph., "Syntax of Scope" (1993), MIT Press
  2. Beck, Sigrid., "Double Objects Again", Linguistic Inquiry, 35, pp.97~124 (2004)
  3. Boneh, Nora., "Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 2009", pp.19~38 (2011), John Benjamins
  4. Borer, Hagit., "Syntax and Semantics 19", pp.175~215 (1986), Academic Press
  5. Bosse, Solveig., "Affected Experiencers", Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 30, pp.1185~1230 (2012)
  6. Bosse, Solveig, "A Formal Semantic Approach to Personal Datives in Southern and Appalachian English", Southern Journal of Linguistics, 38(1), pp.95~116 (2014)
  7. Bosse, Solveig., "Applicative Arguments: a Syntactic and Semantic Investigation of German and English", Berkeley Insights in Linguistics and Semiotics, 93 (2015)
  8. Bruening, Benjamin, "Ditransitive Asymmetries and a Theory of Idiom Formation", Linguistics Inquiry, 41(4), pp.519~562 (2010)
  9. Christian, Donna., "Dialects of English: Studies in Grammatical Variation", pp.11~19 (1991), Longman
  10. Citko, Barbara., "Symmetry in Syntax: Merge, Move, and Labels" (2011), Cambridge University Press
  11. The Personal Dative in Appalachian English as a Reflexive Pronoun, "Conroy, Anastasia.", UMWPiL, 63~88, pp.University of Maryland Working Papers in Linguistics, 16 (2007)
  12. Cuervo, Maria Christina., "Datives at Large", Ph.D., pp.2003
  13. Doggett, Teal Bissell., "All Things Being Unequal: Locality in Movement", Ph.D., pp.2004
  14. Georgala, Eff., "Expletive and Thematic Applicatives", Proceedings of the 26th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, pp.181~189 (2008), Cascadilla Proceedings Project
  15. Georgala, Effi., "Applicatives in Their Structural and Thematic Function: A Minimalist Account of Multitransitivity", Ph.D., pp.2012
  16. Haddad, Youssef, "The Syntax of Southern American English Personal Dative : an Anti-locality Account", Canadian Journal of Linguistics, 2011, pp.56, 403~412
  17. Harley, Heidi, "Wanting, Having, and Getting : A Note on Fodor and Lepore 1998", Linguistic Inquiry, 35, pp.255~267 (2004)
  18. Harley, Heidi., "In Support of the PHAVE Analysis of the Double Object Construction", Linguistic Inquiry, 46, pp.703~730 (2015)
  19. Heim, Irene., "Semantics in Generative Grammar" (1998), Blackwell
  20. Horn, Laurence, "“I Love Me Some Him”: The Landscape of Non-argument Datives", Empirical Issues in Syntax and Semantics, 7, pp.169~192 (2008)
  21. Horn, Laurence., "Beyond Expressives: Explorations in Use-Conditional Meaning", pp.143~189 (2013), Brill
  22. Hornstein, Nobert, "Movement and Control", Linguistic Inquiry, 30, pp.69~96 (1999)
  23. Hutchinson, Corinne., "Micro-Syntactic Variation in North American English", pp.178~214 (2014), Oxford University Press
  24. Jeong, Youngmi., "Applicatives: Structure and Interpretation from a Minimalist Perspective" (2007), John Benjamins Publishing Company
  25. Kim, Kyumin., "External Argument Introducers", Ph.D., pp.2011
  26. Larson, Richard, "On Pylkkänen’s Semantics for Low Applicatives", Linguistic Inquiry, 41(4), pp.701~704 (2010)
  27. 이주은, "Remarks on A and A'-Movement in Double Object Constructions of British English Dialects", 생성문법연구, 24(1), pp.133~164 (2014), 한국생성문법학회
  28. 이주은, "Wh-extraction in English Ditransitives: an Event Structure Approach", 언어연구, 31(4), pp.955~978 (2016), 한국현대언어학회[DOI]
  29. Marantz, Alec., "Theoretical Aspects of Bantu Grammar 1", pp.113~151 (1993), CSLI Publications
  30. McGinnis, Martha., "Object Asymmetries in a Phase Theory of Syntax", Proceedings of the 2001 Canadian Linguistics Association Annual Conference, pp.154~165 (2002), University of Quebec
  31. 문지순, "Toward a Ditransitive Prototype: The Gradience of English Ditransitives", 영어학연구, 20(3), pp.115~134 (2014), 한국영어학학회
  32. Paul, Waltraud., "Argument Structure and Syntactic Relations", pp.261~282 (2010), John Benjamins
  33. Pylkkänen, Liina., "Introducing Arguments", Ph.D., pp.2002
  34. Pylkkänen, Liina., "Introducing Arguments" (2008), MIT Press
  35. Ramchand, Gillian., "Verb Meaning and the Lexicon: A First-Phase Syntax" (2008), Cambridge University Press
  36. Rotschy, Liela., "Subjectification via Metanalysis: the American Vernacular "Personal Dative" Construction", 44th Annual Meeting of the Societas Linguistica Europaea: Ethical Datives and Related Constructions Workshop (2011), Universidad de la Rioja
  37. Tsai, Wei-Tien Dylan., "High Applicatives are not High Enough: A Cartographic Solution", Paper presented in FOSS-6 (2009), National Taiwan Normal University
  38. Webelbuth, Gert., "Southern American English Personal Datives : the Theoretical Significance of Dialectal Variation", American Speech, 81, pp.31~55 (2006)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (6건)