본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

On the Differences between the Double Object Construction and the Dative Construction

2

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류언어학

초록

The Double Object Construction and the Dative Construction roughly form a paraphrase relation, but there are so many interesting syntactic and semantic differences between them. This paper proposes that their differences follow from the Binarity Principle and the Principle of Co-arguments if both objects of the DOC are arguments, whereas the dative phrase of the DC is not an argument but an adjunct.

Abstract

The Double Object Construction and the Dative Construction roughly form a paraphrase relation, but there are so many interesting syntactic and semantic differences between them. This paper proposes that their differences follow from the Binarity Principle and the Principle of Co-arguments if both objects of the DOC are arguments, whereas the dative phrase of the DC is not an argument but an adjunct.

참고문헌 (36)

  1. Aarts, B., "English syntax and argumentation" (2008), Palgrave Macmillan
  2. Aoun, J, "Scope and constituency", Linguistic Inquiry, 20, pp.141~172 (1989)
  3. Barss, A, "A note on anaphora and double objects", Linguistic Inquiry, 17, pp.347~354 (1986)
  4. Beck, S., "Double objects again", Linguistic Inquiry, 35, pp.97~124 (2004)
  5. Boeckx, C, "Reply to 'Control is not Movement'", Linguistic Inquiry, 34, pp.269~280 (2003)
  6. Bowers, J., "Transitivity", Linguistic Inquiry, 33, pp.183~224 (2002)
  7. Bresnan, J., "Is syntactic knowledge probabilistic? Experiments with the English dative alternation, In Roots: Linguistics in search of evidential base", pp.75~96 (2007), Mouton de Gruyter
  8. Bresnan, J., "The gradience of the dative alternation, In Reality Exploration and discovery: pattern interaction in Language and Life", pp.161~184 (2009), CSLI Publications
  9. Bresnan, J., "Predicting the dative alternation, In Cognitive foundations of interpretation", pp.69~94 (2007), Rpyal Netherlands Academy of Science
  10. Bruening, B., "Double Object Constructions disguised as prepositional datives", Linguistic Inquiry, 41, pp.287~305 (2010)
  11. Chomsky, N., "On phases. In Foundational issues in linguistic theory, In Essays in honor of Jean-Roger Vergnaud", pp.133~166 (2008), MIT Press
  12. Chomsky, N., "Minimalist inquiries: the Framework, In Step by Step: Essays on Minimalist syntax in Honor of Howard Lasnik", pp.89~155 (2000), MIT Press
  13. Chomsky, N., "The minimalist program" (1995), MIT Press
  14. Chomsky, N., "The logical structure of linguistic theory" (1975), Univ. of Chicago Press
  15. Dowty, D., "Word meaning and Montague grammar, In The semantics of verbs and times in Generative Semantics and in Montague's PTQ: Synthese Language Library" (1979), Reidel
  16. Emonds, J., "Double object constructions, In The Blackwell companion to syntax", pp.71~144 (2006), Blackwell
  17. Fillmore, C., "Indirect object constructions in English and the ordering of transformations" (1965), Mouton
  18. Goldberg. A. E., "Constructions: a construction grammar approach to argument structure" (1995), the Univ. of Chicago Press
  19. Grimshaw, J., "Argument structure" (1990), MIT Press
  20. Gropen, J., "The learnability and acquisition of the dative alternation in English", Language, 65, pp.203~257 (1989)
  21. Hale, K., "On argument structure and the lexical expression of grammatical relations, In The view from Building 20. Essays in honor of Sylvain Bromberger", pp.53~110 (1993), MIT Press
  22. The basic elements of argument structure. Papers from the UPenn, "MIT Roundtable on argument structure and aspect", Hale, K., 1998, pp.73~118, MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 32
  23. Harley, H., "Possession and the Double Object Construction, In Linguistic Variation Yearbook 2", pp.29~68 (2002), John Benjamins Publishing Company
  24. Jackendoff, R., "Semantic structures" (1990), MIT Press
  25. Kayne, R. S., "Connectedness and binary branching" (1984), Foris
  26. 김광섭, "Control Shift, the Minimal Distance Principle, and the Binarity Principle", 생성문법연구, 22(4), pp.739~751 (2012), 한국생성문법학회
  27. Koizumi, M., "Phrase Structure in Minimalist Syntax", 박사, pp.1995
  28. Krifka, M., "Lexical representations and the nature of the dative alternation", A talk given at DIP collquium (2001)
  29. Larson, R. K., "On the double object construction", Linguistic Inquiry, 19(3), pp.339~391 (1988)
  30. Lasnik, H., "On the subject of infinitives", Proceedings of Chicago Linguistic Society, 27, pp.324~343 (1991)
  31. Lohndal, Terje, "Freezing effects and objects", Journal of linguistics, 47, pp.163~199 (2011)
  32. Ohrle, R., "The grammatical status of English dative alternation" (1976), MIT Press
  33. Partee, B. H., "Subject and object in modern English, In Outstanding dissertations in Linguistics Series" (1965), Garland
  34. Pesetsky, D., "Zero syntax" (1995), MIT Press
  35. Pinker, S., "Learnability and cognition: the acquisition of argument structure" (1989), MIT Press
  36. Radford, A., "Minimalist syntax" (2005), Cambridge Univ. Press

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (11건)