영어의 이중목적어 구문의 격 부여에 관하여
On the Case Assignment of Double Object Construction in English
1
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In the recent linguistic literature regarding Case assignment, the Nominate Case is assigned in a specifier -head relationship( between I and spec IP) and accusative (direct object) Case assignment takes place in a head-complement relationship (between V and its sister DP). Dative case (Indirect object), however, has no place to be assigned in this structural configuration. English Indirect object as a nonstructural case is licensed in connection with θ-marking. In this respect this study is aimed to argue that the nonstructural case is licensed at argument structure, vP-structure in terms of an initial level where θ-marking and nonstructural case licensing take place. This level is the first one prior to structural case licensing. It is also pointed out that dative case as indirect object is licensed only by light v heads.
Abstract
In the recent linguistic literature regarding Case assignment, the Nominate Case is assigned in a specifier -head relationship( between I and spec IP) and accusative (direct object) Case assignment takes place in a head-complement relationship (between V and its sister DP). Dative case (Indirect object), however, has no place to be assigned in this structural configuration. English Indirect object as a nonstructural case is licensed in connection with θ-marking. In this respect this study is aimed to argue that the nonstructural case is licensed at argument structure, vP-structure in terms of an initial level where θ-marking and nonstructural case licensing take place. This level is the first one prior to structural case licensing. It is also pointed out that dative case as indirect object is licensed only by light v heads.
참고문헌 (21)
- 김관영, "유사공백화구문에서의 V-이동", 언어학, 12(4), pp.17~36 (2004)
- 박승혁, "최소주의 문법론" (1997), 서울: 한국문화사
- Adger, D, "Core Syntax" (2003), Oxford UP
- Baker, M, "Thematic Roles and Syntactic Structure In Elements of Grammar", pp.73~137 (1997), Dordrecht: Kluwer
- Barss, A., "A Note on Anaphora and Double Objects", Linguistic Inquiry, 17, pp.347~54 (1986)
- Beck, S., "Double Object Again", Linguistic Inquiry, 35, pp.97~124 (2004)
- Chomsky, N, "The Logical Structure of Linguistic Theory" (1975), U of Chicago P Chicago, illinois
- Chomsky, N, "Knowledge of Language" (1986), New York: Praeger
- Chomsky, N, "The Minimalist Program" (1995), MIT Press. Cambridge Mass
- Chomsky, N, "Minimalist Inquiries: The framework In Step by step", pp.89~155 (2000), Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press
- Emonds, J, "A transformational Approach to English Syntax" (1976), New York: Academic P
- Filmore, C, "Indirect Object Constructions in English and the Ordering of Transformation" (1965), The Hague: Mouton.Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press
- Jacobson, P, "Phrase Structure, Grammatical Relations and Discontinuous Constituent in Syntax and Semantics 20; Discontinuous Constituent" (1988), New York: Academic Press
- Kayne, R, "Unambiguous Paths In Connectedness and Binary Branching", pp.129~164 (1984), Dordrecht; Foris Publications
- Larson, R, "On the Double Object Construction", Linguistic Inquiry, 19, pp.335~91 (1988)
- Lasnik, H, "Verbal Morphology: Syntactic Structures Meets the Minimalist Program in volution and Revolution in Linguistic Theory", pp.251~75 (1995), Georgetown: Georgetown UP
- Lasnik, H, "Minimalist Analysis" (1999), Oxford: Blackwell
- Marantz, A, "On the Nature of Grammatical Relations" (1984), Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press
- McGinnis, M, "Semantic and Morphological Restrictions in Experiencer Predicates.", Proceedings of the 2000 CLA Annual Conference, pp.245~256 (2001), Ottawa: University of Ottawa, Department of Linguistics, Cahiers Linguistics d Ottawa
- Radford, A, "Syntax" (1997), Cambridge UP
- Woolford, Ellen, "Lexical Case, Marantz(1984) Inherent Case and Argument Structure", Linguistic Inquiry, 37, pp.111~130 (2006)