본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

사이버명예훼손 피해의 심각성과 법적 대응방안

A Study on Defamation in Cyberspace

0

조회

0

다운로드

23

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Due to the characteristic of cyberspace, defamation in cyberspace, when compared to off-line defamation, is a momentary and widespread violation of human rights and has possibility of fabrication of defamation even by the third party. Cyberspace is invisible and it is possible for criminals to defame other people without exposure of their faces and identities. There is almost no restriction in approaching network-connected cyberspace. So anyone can spread easily that information and diffuse defamation indefinitely. Cyberspace is a ideological space composed of the computer development and the network formation and is a information space in extension field of communication. It is characterized by non-facing, communication in both directions, no limit in space and time, easy accessibility, variety of information, anonymity. These features of cyberspace have merits and demerit, so it has ambivalent character about pious victims and revealed truth. Therefore, new researches and approaches on the regulation are required according to various types and characters of cyberspace. Now regulation against defamation in cyberspace can be divided by 'Regulation by the Criminal Law', 'Regulation by Act on Promotion of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection'. We study libel, contempt and possibility of application to internet defamation in regulation by the Criminal Law and study regulation by Act on Promotion of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection. We consider whether aiding and abetting defamation is formed. Together with the development of cyberspace, the research on cyberspace should be developed continuously. Although it is important to prepare measurement in terms of criminal law in order to deal with cyber defamation of character, more fundamental measurement is to improve netizens' ethics and to reinforce ethics education. No matter how perfect law is prepared, unless netizens' consciousness is changed, the law is unless. For this, investigation organization, educational organization and private groups should operate cybercrime preventive class for students on a regular basis, and reinforce ethics class of school curriculum. In addition, it is also ideal to have online service providers create cyberspace user guideline for themselves, and protect individual's fame through monitoring.

Abstract

Due to the characteristic of cyberspace, defamation in cyberspace, when compared to off-line defamation, is a momentary and widespread violation of human rights and has possibility of fabrication of defamation even by the third party. Cyberspace is invisible and it is possible for criminals to defame other people without exposure of their faces and identities. There is almost no restriction in approaching network-connected cyberspace. So anyone can spread easily that information and diffuse defamation indefinitely. Cyberspace is a ideological space composed of the computer development and the network formation and is a information space in extension field of communication. It is characterized by non-facing, communication in both directions, no limit in space and time, easy accessibility, variety of information, anonymity. These features of cyberspace have merits and demerit, so it has ambivalent character about pious victims and revealed truth. Therefore, new researches and approaches on the regulation are required according to various types and characters of cyberspace. Now regulation against defamation in cyberspace can be divided by 'Regulation by the Criminal Law', 'Regulation by Act on Promotion of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection'. We study libel, contempt and possibility of application to internet defamation in regulation by the Criminal Law and study regulation by Act on Promotion of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection. We consider whether aiding and abetting defamation is formed. Together with the development of cyberspace, the research on cyberspace should be developed continuously. Although it is important to prepare measurement in terms of criminal law in order to deal with cyber defamation of character, more fundamental measurement is to improve netizens' ethics and to reinforce ethics education. No matter how perfect law is prepared, unless netizens' consciousness is changed, the law is unless. For this, investigation organization, educational organization and private groups should operate cybercrime preventive class for students on a regular basis, and reinforce ethics class of school curriculum. In addition, it is also ideal to have online service providers create cyberspace user guideline for themselves, and protect individual's fame through monitoring.

참고문헌 (20)

  1. 박상기, "형법각론" (2008), 박영사
  2. 이재상, "형법각론" (2004), 박영사
  3. 한국전산원, "한국인터넷백서" (2005)
  4. 정보통신부, "국가정보보호백서" (2005)
  5. 정보통신윤리위원회, "정보통신윤리관련 종합통계" (2007)
  6. 인터넷모니터 종합보고서, "청소년보호위원회", ~ (2005)
  7. 명재진, "공공기관의 인터넷게시판 실명제 실시에 관한 소고" (2003), CLIS Monthly
  8. 박균성, "인터넷상 명예훼손 실태 및 대응방안" (2005), 정보통신윤리위원회
  9. 백광훈, "사이버범죄에 대한 ISP의 형사책임에 관한 연구" (2003), 한국형사정책연구원
  10. 서보학, "인터넷상의 정보유포와 형사책임", 형사정책연구, 12(3) (2001)
  11. 이동숙, "사이버공간에서의 명예훼손죄에 관한 형사법적 고찰", 석사, pp.2003
  12. 정 완, "사이버모욕에 관한 고찰", 형사정책연구소식, (7, pp.8) (2005), ~
  13. 정 완, "“사이버모욕죄 입법 적극 검토를” 동아일보 2008.8.2", ~ (2008)
  14. 정 완, "온라인상의 저작권침해에 대한 OSP의 민사책임", 인터넷법률, (20) (2003)
  15. 정 완, "사이버명예훼손에 관한 소고”, 형사정책연구소식 2003.3", 4, 2003
  16. 정 완, "사이버폭력에 대한 법제도적 대응방안 연구" (2005), 정보통신윤리위원회
  17. 정 완, "인터넷상명예훼손의 합리적 대응방안" (2007), 한국형사정책연구원
  18. 정 완, "정보통신망상 불법행위의 형사책임에 관한 연구" (2004), 한국형사정책연구원
  19. 한상희, "사이버공간에서의 익명성과 책임" (2003), CLIS Monthly
  20. 현대호, "인터넷상의 정보보호에 관한 법제연구" (2000), 한국법제연구원

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (10건)