사이버명예훼손 피해의 민사적 구제에 관한 고찰
A Study on the Civil Liability of Cyber Defamation
0
조회
0
다운로드
5
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Cyberspace gives us usefulness and convenience. on the other hand, it has a lot of bad functions such as cyber defamation and privacy disturbance etc. If a statement on cyberspace wrongly accuses someone and it is against the law,there would be a conflict between the freedom of expression and right to privacy. Recently, Internet portal sites have high number defamation of character. There are a lot of articles and replies on personal homepage, blog, internet homepages. It happens to celebrities and friends. It happens to people you don't know about. Many things happen because of this. I don't think we know the seriousness of this. What is the reason to make this much of a big fuss although internet homepages are personal things ? All of us needs to think of it again. The law of Defamation has come under renewed scrutiny with the advent of the Internet. This is largely because it is the nature of the Internet to give the average, anonymous person an opportunity to express their opinion well-beyond any previously defined venue. Consider the fact that a person of modest means now has the ability to publish a statement, article, or news item across the world in an instant, without an editor checking the facts. Thereafter, the item will linger on the 'Net for months, or even years, impossible to recover and amend, if the "facts" are erroneous. Therefore, it is inevitable that problems are going to arise. The main issue to remember when dealing with the Internet is that people still have their basic legal rights intact on the Net, and - likewise - the Internet is not as completely anonymous as the typical person may presumes. Usually, legal liabilities of cyber defamation consist of criminal one, civil one and administrative one. This article focuses on the cyber defamation and its civil liability and some remedy procedures.
Abstract
Cyberspace gives us usefulness and convenience. on the other hand, it has a lot of bad functions such as cyber defamation and privacy disturbance etc. If a statement on cyberspace wrongly accuses someone and it is against the law,there would be a conflict between the freedom of expression and right to privacy. Recently, Internet portal sites have high number defamation of character. There are a lot of articles and replies on personal homepage, blog, internet homepages. It happens to celebrities and friends. It happens to people you don't know about. Many things happen because of this. I don't think we know the seriousness of this. What is the reason to make this much of a big fuss although internet homepages are personal things ? All of us needs to think of it again. The law of Defamation has come under renewed scrutiny with the advent of the Internet. This is largely because it is the nature of the Internet to give the average, anonymous person an opportunity to express their opinion well-beyond any previously defined venue. Consider the fact that a person of modest means now has the ability to publish a statement, article, or news item across the world in an instant, without an editor checking the facts. Thereafter, the item will linger on the 'Net for months, or even years, impossible to recover and amend, if the "facts" are erroneous. Therefore, it is inevitable that problems are going to arise. The main issue to remember when dealing with the Internet is that people still have their basic legal rights intact on the Net, and - likewise - the Internet is not as completely anonymous as the typical person may presumes. Usually, legal liabilities of cyber defamation consist of criminal one, civil one and administrative one. This article focuses on the cyber defamation and its civil liability and some remedy procedures.
참고문헌 (36)
- 곽윤직, "채권각론" (2001), 박영사
- 김재국, "영미법상 징벌적 손해배상의 도입에 관한 소고", 비교사법, 2(1)
- 김재형, "인터넷에 의한 인격침해", 인터넷과 법률 (2002)
- 징벌적 배상법리의 발전과정과 현황. in: 징벌적 손해배상제도의 법리와 도입가능성, "김제완", 한국법제연구원, ~ (2007)
- 인터넷상 명예훼손 실태 및 대응방안, "박균성", 정보통신윤리위원회, ~ (2005)
- 박선영, "가상공간에서의 표현의 자유와 청소년보호", 인터넷법률, (15) (2003)
- 박용상, "명예훼손법" (2007), 박영사
- 박희영, "인터넷서비스제공자의 형사책임에 관한 연구", 인터넷법률, (22) (2004)
- 소성규, "인터넷상 名譽毁損에 대한 온라인서비스제공자의 民事責任", 비교사법, 11(3), pp.207~230 (2004), 한국비교사법학회
- 양재모, "인터넷서비스제공자의 불법행위에 관한 연구", 박사, pp.2003
- 이균용, "저서, 신문, 잡지 등의 출판 등 금지를 구하는 가처분의 실무상 문제", 언론관계소송 (2007), 한국사법행정학회
- 이봉림, "사이버공간의 명예훼손", 성균관법학, 19(3), pp.805~844 (2007), 법학연구소
- 이승호, "사이버명예훼손의 처리과정에서 제기되는 법적 과제", 인터넷법률, (10) (2002)
- 이시윤, "신민사집행법" (2008), 박영사
- 이인석, "명예훼손에 대한 온라인서비스제공자의 민사책임", 저스티스, (67) (2002)
- 이재홍, "후론 I 인격권침해", 민법주해, 19 (2005), 박영사
- 이점인, "징벌적 손해배상제도의 도입필요성과 가능성에 대한 일고찰", 동아법학, (38) (2006)
- 장철익, "명예훼손에 대한 온라인서비스제공자의 손해배상책임", 언론중재, 24(1) (2004)
- 인터넷상 명예훼손의 합리적 대응방안, "정 완", 한국형사정책연구원, ~ (2007)
- 정완, "사이버명예훼손 피해의 심각성과 법적 대응방안", 피해자학연구, 16(2), pp.167~190 (2008), 한국피해자학회
- 정완, "사이버상의 불법정보 유통에 대한 OSP의 책임", 형사정책연구, 16(1), pp.127~154 (2005), 한국형사정책연구원
- 정 완, "온라인상 저작권침해에 대한 OSP의 민사책임", 인터넷법률, (20) (2003)
- 정 완, "인터넷상 명예훼손의 현황과 입법과제", 인터넷과 법 (2007), 한국법제연구원
- 정완, "인터넷상의 인권침해와 그 구제", 저스티스, (109), pp.7~42 (2009), 한국법학원
- 정상규, "인터넷과 명예훼손", 언론관계소송 (2007), 한국사법행정학회
- 최문기, "명예훼손의 민사책임에 관한 소고", 성균관법학 (1999)
- 황인경, "인터넷상의 펌이나 링크에 의한 명예훼손의 문제", 언론중재 (2006)
- 황찬현, "사이버스페이스에서의 명예훼손과 인권보장: 인터넷사업자의 책임과 관련하여", 저스티스, (34) (2001)
- 黃 泰 正, "情報通信서비스提供者의 責任에 관한 比較法的 考察", 선진상사법률연구, (28), pp.22~72 (2005), 법무부
- 名譽毁損の損害額の算定について-諸外國の狀況の實證的分析-, "山地修", ~, pp.判例 No.1055 (2001)
- 山口いつ子, "パソコン通信における名損: ニフティサ-ブ事件", 法律時報, 69(9) (1997)
- 高橋和之, "パソコン通信と名損", ジュリスト, (1120) (1997)
- 橋本佳幸, "パソコン通信の電子議室における言による名損の成否および名損にあたる言にするシステム․オペレ-タ-の削除義務違反の有無; ニフティサ-ブ現代史想フォ-ラム事件 控訴審判決", 判例時報, (1809) (2003)
- David G. Owen, "Punitive damages in products liability litigation", Mich. L. Rev., 74 (1976)
- Richard L. Blatt, "Punitive Damages: A State-By-State Guide to Law and Practice", ~ (2005)
- John J. Kircher, "Punitive Damages LAW and PRACTICE Vol.1", ~ (2000)