형사조정제도의 실효성 확보방안 연구
A Study of the Criminal Arbitration on the Plan for Effectiveness
0
조회
0
다운로드
14
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Recently, as the discussions on the victimology and the theory of replevin from various angles and viewpoints, are getting more lively, various countries legalize the criminal reconciliation and arbitration through the revision of the criminal law. In our country also the problems of the private arbitrations of the criminal case have been noticed and in 1990s the interest on the private law for replevin and victimology was getting higher. From the first day of 2007, "Criminal Arbitration" has been named and activated nationally. This act mainly prevents the abuse of law suits and also leads to the reduction of the works of the prosecutors in dealing with civil and criminal law cases. It works as follows: the parties involved refer the case to the civilian committee, "the Center of the Aide for the Criminal Victims" that consists of local personnels, to peacefully arbitrate the struggles. However the problem is lacking in the regulations for the criminal arbitration and in its theoretical ground. Also having done as a customary program deviating from its original intention and goal, the following problems are raised in its effectiveness: the problem of publicity and reliability of the constitution and formation for the criminal arbitration committee, of violation of the appropriate procedure, of the legal judgement on the actual result of arbitration, of violation of the equality right, of the protection of the personal right and information, of the principle of assuming innocence. Therefore this study attempts to ensure its effectiveness through securing the right position of "the criminal arbitration" by way of improving its organization and formation from the institutional and legal aspects.
Abstract
Recently, as the discussions on the victimology and the theory of replevin from various angles and viewpoints, are getting more lively, various countries legalize the criminal reconciliation and arbitration through the revision of the criminal law. In our country also the problems of the private arbitrations of the criminal case have been noticed and in 1990s the interest on the private law for replevin and victimology was getting higher. From the first day of 2007, "Criminal Arbitration" has been named and activated nationally. This act mainly prevents the abuse of law suits and also leads to the reduction of the works of the prosecutors in dealing with civil and criminal law cases. It works as follows: the parties involved refer the case to the civilian committee, "the Center of the Aide for the Criminal Victims" that consists of local personnels, to peacefully arbitrate the struggles. However the problem is lacking in the regulations for the criminal arbitration and in its theoretical ground. Also having done as a customary program deviating from its original intention and goal, the following problems are raised in its effectiveness: the problem of publicity and reliability of the constitution and formation for the criminal arbitration committee, of violation of the appropriate procedure, of the legal judgement on the actual result of arbitration, of violation of the equality right, of the protection of the personal right and information, of the principle of assuming innocence. Therefore this study attempts to ensure its effectiveness through securing the right position of "the criminal arbitration" by way of improving its organization and formation from the institutional and legal aspects.
참고문헌 (34)
- 검찰미래기획단, "형사조정제도관련자료집 3: 미국입법자료(상), 상임연구관 연구자료집 XⅧ" (2006), 대검찰청
- 김성돈, "형사절차상 피해자-가해자-조정제도의 도입방안", 피해자학연구, 9(1) (2001), 한국피해자학회
- 김성환, "독일양형론(1)", 피해자학연구, 14(1), pp.413~458 (2006), 한국피해자학회
- 김용세, "犯罪被害者救助制度에 관한 小考", 비교형사법연구, 4(2), pp.19~552 (2002), 한국비교형사법학회
- 김용세, "형사상 화해 조정제도에 관한 형사사법 실무자의 인식", 피해자학연구, 12(2) (2006), 한국피해자학회
- 김용욱, "형사조정제도에 관한 소고", 비교법연구, 2 (2007), 배제대학교 비교법연구소
- 김재중, "청주지역 화해사례를 통해 본 범죄피해자-가해자 화해제도의 발전방향", 피해자학연구, 15(1), pp.111~140 (2007), 한국피해자학회
- 김지선, "범죄피해자지원센터의 운영현황 및 활성화방안" (2006), 한국형사정책연구원
- 류병관, "독일 형법상의 배상과 화해(TOA) : 발전과정과 이론적 함의", 피해자학연구, 12(2), pp.339~388 (2004), 한국피해자학회
- 박상식, "회복적 사법에 관한 연구", 박사, pp.2004
- 법무부, "형사법상 범죄피해자의 원상회복제도: 미국, 프랑스를 중심으로" (2002)
- 송길룡, "형사조정제도 개관 및 시행 매뉴얼" (2007), 대구지검 김천지청 피해자지원센터
- 송길용, "형사조정의 새로운 이해", 법조, 56(5), pp.136~186 (2007), 법조협회
- 심재무, "형사화해·조정제도의 도입과 문제점", 경성법학, 14(2) (2005), 경성대학교 법학연구소
- 오영근, "범죄피해자에 대한 재정적 지원제도의 현황과 개선방안", 피해자학연구, 13(1), pp.5~49 (2005), 한국피해자학회
- 윤영철, "형사절차에서의 가해자-피해자-조정제도에 대한 비판적 고찰", 형사법연구, 19(3-하), pp.849~876 (2007), 한국형사법학회
- Dieter D?lling u.a., "가해자-피해자-조정: 범죄대처의 새로운 가능성과 행위자와 피해자에 대한 기회" (2002), 한국형사정책연구원
- 이진국, "형사사법체계상 회복적 사법이념의 실천방안" (2006), 형사정책연구원
- 이호중, "회복적 사법-이념과 법이론적 쟁점들", 피해자학 연구, 9(1) (2001)
- 이호중, "피해자-범죄자 조정제도에 관한 연구", 외법논집, (13) (2002), 한국외국어대학교 외국학종합연구센터 법학연구소
- 조광훈, "형사조정제도의 올바른 운용과 활성화를 위한 소고", 사법행정, 49(4) (2008), 한국사법행정학회
- 조광훈, "형사조정제도에 관한 연구", 법조, 57(5), pp.351~401 (2008), 법조협회
- 최영승, "현행 형사화해제도의 실태 및 문제점", 피해자학연구, 15(1) (2007), 한국피해자학회
- 한영수, "선고유예제도의 정비방안", 형사정책연구, 17(4), pp.537~576 (2006), 한국형사정책연구원
- 한인섭, "북구의 형사정책 연구: 형벌 및 행형의 이론과 실제", 지역연구, 3(2) (1994), 서울대학교 지역종합연구소
- Dialogue Program Requirements, Victim-Offender Reconciliation Program(VORP) Information and Resource Center, "Victim-Offender Mediation", pp.1994, American Bar Association
- Kieran McEvoy, "Criminology, Conflict Resolution and Restorative Justice" (2003), Palgrave MacMillan
- Braithwaite Doug, "A Future Where Punishment is Marginalized: Realistic or Utopian?", UCLA Law Review, 46, pp.1743~ (1999)
- Eurpoean Forum for Victim-Offender Mediation and Restorative Justice, "Rebuilding Community Connections Mediation and Restorative Justice in Europe" (2004), Council of Europe Publishing
- Liebmann,Marian, "Restorative Justice(How It Works)" (2007), Jessica Kingsley Pub
- Vanness, Daniel W, "Restoring Justice" (2008), Lightning Source Inc
- Vanness, Daniel W, "New Wine and Old Wineskins: Four Challenges of Restorative Justice", Criminal Law Forum, 4(2) (1993)
- Umbreit John, "Avoiding the Marginalization and McDonaldization of Victim-Offender Mediation, Restorative Juvenile Justice" (1999), Oxford Univ Pr
- Zehr,Howard, "Changing Lenses:A New Focus for Crime and Justice" (1990), Herald Press(PA)