본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

한국인 학습자의 영어 말하기 오류와 오류 인식에 대한 연구

Korean Learners’ English Speaking Errors and Recognition of the Errors

2

조회

0

다운로드

4

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류언어학

초록

The purpose of this study is to analyze Korean learners' English speaking errors and their error recognition. To investigate the issues, the 44 undergraduates took TOEIC Speaking Test, and three native speakers of English transcribed the recordings and analyzed the errors. The participants then self-corrected their own scripts. The self-corrected data were compared to the original scripts to examine their error recognition. The original errors and corrected ones were classified into seven categories: noun phrase, verb phrase, adjective phrase, clause/sentence structure phrase, prepositional phrase, cardinal numeral/price terms and miscellaneous. The result revealed that the most frequent errors were found in the order of noun phrase, verb phrase, number/price terms etc. In the error recognition, errors in BE omission and subject and verb omission were recognized and corrected well, but errors in most of the subcategories were not corrected at all. Finally, number disagreement, article and subject and verb disagreement errors were attempted to correct but failed. Based on the findings, pedagogical implications are discussed.

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to analyze Korean learners' English speaking errors and their error recognition. To investigate the issues, the 44 undergraduates took TOEIC Speaking Test, and three native speakers of English transcribed the recordings and analyzed the errors. The participants then self-corrected their own scripts. The self-corrected data were compared to the original scripts to examine their error recognition. The original errors and corrected ones were classified into seven categories: noun phrase, verb phrase, adjective phrase, clause/sentence structure phrase, prepositional phrase, cardinal numeral/price terms and miscellaneous. The result revealed that the most frequent errors were found in the order of noun phrase, verb phrase, number/price terms etc. In the error recognition, errors in BE omission and subject and verb omission were recognized and corrected well, but errors in most of the subcategories were not corrected at all. Finally, number disagreement, article and subject and verb disagreement errors were attempted to correct but failed. Based on the findings, pedagogical implications are discussed.

참고문헌 (16)

  1. 김덕기, "영어교육론" (1998), 고려대학교 출판부
  2. 김영실, "비즈니스 영어학습자의 발화오류 분석", 비서학논총, 13(2), pp.179~200 (2004), 한국비서학회
  3. 노선경, "안정 상태 L2 영어 학습자의 말하기 오류 분석 : 부자연스러운 표현 오류와 의사소통 장애 오류를 중심으로", 석사, 영어교육학, pp.2010
  4. 박영예, "대학생 영어 작문에 나타난 오류 분석", 언어연구, 15(2), pp.73~89 (1999)
  5. 장지혜, "예비 초등 영어교사들의 영작문에 나타난 오류 분석", 영어영문학연구, 54(3), pp.327~351 (2012), 한국중앙영어영문학회
  6. Brown, H. D., "Principle of language learning and teaching" (1994), Prentice Hall
  7. Burt, M., "Error analysis in the adult EFL classroom", TESOL Quarterly, 9(1), pp.53~63 (1975)
  8. Chin, C. S., "Error analysis: An investigation of spoken errors of Korean EFL Learners", English Teaching, 56(2), pp.97~123 (2001)
  9. Corder, S. P., "Error analysis and interlanguage" (1981), Oxford University Press
  10. Dulay, H., "Language two" (1982), Oxford University Press
  11. James, C., "Errors in language learning and use: Exploring error analysis" (1998), Longman
  12. Khampang, P., "Thai difficulties in using English prepositions", Language Learning, 24(2), pp.215~222 (1974)
  13. Kim, H., "An analysis of learner’s errors made in their English composition, especially in the high school level", master, pp.1987
  14. Kim, J. Y., "Error analysis: A study of written errors of Korean EFL learners", Korean Journal of Applied Linguistics, 41(2), pp.21~58 (1998)
  15. Sharma, S. K., "Error analysis: Why and how?", English Teaching Forum, 19(3), pp.21~25 (1981)
  16. 윤현경, "Grammar Errors in Korean EFL Learners’ TOEIC Speaking Test", 영어교육, 67(4), pp.287~309 (2012), 한국영어교육학회

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)