Speech Act Metonymy in Biscuit Conditionals
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Choi, Youngju & Joh, Yoon-kyoung. (2016). Speech Act Metonymy in Biscuit Conditionals. The Linguistic Association of Korea Journal, 24(4), 81-102. Biscuit conditionals are distinguished from indicative conditionals in that their consequent clauses are not dependent on conditional clauses while they are in indicative conditionals. In the example of the biscuit conditionals, If you are hungry, there are biscuits on the sideboard, it is apparent that the existence of biscuits on the sideboard does not depend on one's hunger. This paper demonstrates that the conditional clause is metonymically interpreted as the question where can I find food? and the consequent clause as the answer there are biscuits on the sideboard. Then the conditional will be construed as If your question is, where can I find food, then my answer to you is, there are biscuits on the sideboard, leading to the conclusion that biscuit conditionals behave like indicative conditionals, with their consequent clauses having dependency on their conditional clauses: If the question is not "where can I find food?" the answer will not be "there are biscuits on the sideboard. How the conditional and consequent clauses of biscuit conditionals are interpreted as question-answer pairs will be explained based on speech act metonymy.
Abstract
Choi, Youngju & Joh, Yoon-kyoung. (2016). Speech Act Metonymy in Biscuit Conditionals. The Linguistic Association of Korea Journal, 24(4), 81-102. Biscuit conditionals are distinguished from indicative conditionals in that their consequent clauses are not dependent on conditional clauses while they are in indicative conditionals. In the example of the biscuit conditionals, If you are hungry, there are biscuits on the sideboard, it is apparent that the existence of biscuits on the sideboard does not depend on one's hunger. This paper demonstrates that the conditional clause is metonymically interpreted as the question where can I find food? and the consequent clause as the answer there are biscuits on the sideboard. Then the conditional will be construed as If your question is, where can I find food, then my answer to you is, there are biscuits on the sideboard, leading to the conclusion that biscuit conditionals behave like indicative conditionals, with their consequent clauses having dependency on their conditional clauses: If the question is not "where can I find food?" the answer will not be "there are biscuits on the sideboard. How the conditional and consequent clauses of biscuit conditionals are interpreted as question-answer pairs will be explained based on speech act metonymy.
참고문헌 (26)
- Bach, K., "The myth of conventional implicature", Linguistics and Philosophy, 22, pp.327~366 (1999)
- Bach, K., "Linguistic communication and speech acts" (1979), MIT Press
- Boër, S., "A peformadox in truth conditional semantics", Linguistics and Philosophy, 4, pp.71~100 (1980)
- 최영주, "The Potentiality for Actuality Metonymy in English and Korean", 영어영문학21, 26(4), pp.407~429 (2013), 21세기영어영문학회
- Comrie, B., "On conditionals", pp.77~99 (1986), Cambridge University Press
- DeRose, K., "Conditional assertions and biscuit conditionals", Noûs, 33, pp.405~420 (1999)
- Dummet, M., "Frege : Philosophy of language" (1973), Duckworsth
- Ebert, C., "A unified analysis of indicative and biscuit conditionals as topics", SALT XVIII, pp.266~283 (2008)
- Grice, H. P., "Syntax and semantics Vol. 3: Speech acts", pp.41~58 (1967), Academic Press
- Horn, R., "A Natural History of Negation" (1989), CSLI Publications
- Iatridou, S., "Topics in Conditionals", doctor, pp.1991
- 조윤경, "Biscuit Conditionals as Disguised Conversations", 영어학, 11(1), pp.243~268 (2011), 한국영어학회
- Kövecses, Z., "Metonymy : Developing a cognitive linguistic view", Cognitive Linguistics, 9(1), pp.37~77 (1998)
- Lakoff, G., "Semantics of natural language", pp.545~665 (1972), Reidel
- McCready, E., "Two Japanese adverbials and expressive content", A talk given at the Semantics and Linguistic Theory (SALT) conference 14 (2004)
- Panther, K. -U., "A cognitive approach to inferencing in conversation", Journal of Pragmatics, 30(6), pp.755~769 (1998)
- Panther, K. -U., "Metonymy in language and thought", pp.333~357 (1999), John Benjamins
- Panther, K. -U., "Reviewing linguistic thought: Converging trends for the 21st century", pp.53~76 (2005), Mouton der Gruyter
- Panther, K. -U., "The Oxford handbook of cognitive linguistics", pp.236~263 (2007), Oxford University Press
- Peirsman, Y., "Metonymy as a prototypical category", Cognitive Linguistics, 17(3), pp.269~316 (2006)
- Portner, P., "The semantics of imperatives: Within a theory of clause types", talk given at the Semantics and Linguistic Theory (SALT) Conference 14 (2004)
- Radden, G., "Metonymy in language and thought", pp.17~59 (1999), John Benjamins
- Sadock, J., "Towards a linguistic theory of speech acts" (1974), Academic Press
- Siegel, M., "Biscuit conditionals : Quantification over potential literal acts", Linguistics and Philosophy, 29, pp.167~203 (2006)
- Thornburg, L., "Discourse and perspectives in cognitive linguistics", pp.205~219 (1997), John Benjamins
- Van der Auwera, J., "On Conditionals", pp.197~214 (1986), Cambridge University Press