고대영어의 이중 목적어 구문 도출
The Double Object Constructions in Old English
1
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper concerns about the derivation of the double object constructions of Old English from LCA definition in the minimalist framework (Chomsky 2005, 2006). In Old English double object constructions, IO-DO surface order and DO-IO surface order took place at the approximately same rate(54%, 46% respectively) and no DO-to IO surface order, shown in that of Modern English, was existed. Thus these phenomena relevant to Old English double object constructions have long made it difficult to set up what the basic structure is and to undertake how we set to deal with their derivations in Old English structure. In this paper, assuming Old English clause structure to be a single VP structure like [VP V ...], not [VP v [VP V ...]] of Modern English, and IO and DO in Old English to be occupied in the same V-position, I show that surface orders between IO and DO are the results from the interactions of LCA which makes IO or DO move out of VP in order to get the proper PF interpretation.
Abstract
This paper concerns about the derivation of the double object constructions of Old English from LCA definition in the minimalist framework (Chomsky 2005, 2006). In Old English double object constructions, IO-DO surface order and DO-IO surface order took place at the approximately same rate(54%, 46% respectively) and no DO-to IO surface order, shown in that of Modern English, was existed. Thus these phenomena relevant to Old English double object constructions have long made it difficult to set up what the basic structure is and to undertake how we set to deal with their derivations in Old English structure. In this paper, assuming Old English clause structure to be a single VP structure like [VP V ...], not [VP v [VP V ...]] of Modern English, and IO and DO in Old English to be occupied in the same V-position, I show that surface orders between IO and DO are the results from the interactions of LCA which makes IO or DO move out of VP in order to get the proper PF interpretation.
참고문헌 (14)
- 박상수, "영어 이중 목적어 어순의 통시적 변화", 언어과학, 14(1), pp.87~107 (2007), 한국언어과학회
- 이필환, "영어통시통사론" (1999), 한국문화사
- Allen,C, "Case marking and Reanalysis: Grammatical Relations from Old to Early Modern English" (1995), Oxford University Press
- Chomsky,N, "On Phase" (2005), MIT
- Chomsky,N, "Approaching UG from Below", 석사, pp.2006
- Fox, D, "Cyclic Linearization of Syntactic Structure", 석사, pp.2004
- Gelderen,E, "The Rise of Functional Categories" (1993), John Benjamins
- Kayne,R, "The Antisymmetry of Syntax" (1994), MIT Press
- Kemenade,A, "Syntactic Case and Morphological Case in the History of English" (1987), Foris
- Koopman,W, "Word Order in Old English; with Special Reference to the Verb Phrase", 석사, pp.1990
- Oshima,S, "A Minimalist Approach of Double Object Constructions in English from the Comparative Syntax", 關西外國大學 硏究論集, 85, pp.1~18 (2007)
- Pillippe,J, "The Rise of the Article the Germanic Language. in:Parameters of Morphosyntactic Change", pp.62~93 (1997), Cambridge Univ. Press
- Polo,C, "Double Objects and Morphological Triggers for Syntactic Case. in:Syntactic Effects of Morphological Change", pp.124~142 (2002), Oxford University Press
- Weerman,F, "On the Relationship between Morphological and Syntactic case. in:Parameters of Morphosyntactic Change", pp.427~459 (1997), Cambridge Univ. Press