한국 수어의 시제와 상에 대한 언어유형론적 검토
A linguistic typological view on tense and aspects of korean sign languages.
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Tense is a grammatical category that expresses the temporal position of an event, while aspect is a way to look into the internal temporal composition of an event. In the description of tense and aspect in Korean Sign Language, there is confusion in the use of terms and descriptions of grammar. Therefore, it is necessary that the onomasiological approach to tense and aspects in Korean Sign Language, that is a perspective to analyze from concepts to symbols used in Linguistic Typology. Inflectional elements that appear along the time line can be set as grammaticalized tense expressions in a sign language. The leaning forward is analyzed as the near future tense, and the slow leaning forward is the future in Korean Sign Language. There is neither a perfective aspect that expresses a global view of the event nor an imperfective, so such viewpoint aspects are not useful for distinguishing aspects in Korean Sign Language. On the other hand, from the perspective of phasal aspects, depending on the stages of progression of an event, there are prospective, inchoative, progressive, conclusive, completive, and resultative, which are also found in Korean Sign Language. In terms of tense and aspects in Korean Sign Language, it is analyzed that aspect is being grammaticalized into a more basic grammatical category, and tense is still in the early stages of grammaticalization. This is because the way of viewing temporal phases of events is more iconic and easier to recognize.
Abstract
Tense is a grammatical category that expresses the temporal position of an event, while aspect is a way to look into the internal temporal composition of an event. In the description of tense and aspect in Korean Sign Language, there is confusion in the use of terms and descriptions of grammar. Therefore, it is necessary that the onomasiological approach to tense and aspects in Korean Sign Language, that is a perspective to analyze from concepts to symbols used in Linguistic Typology. Inflectional elements that appear along the time line can be set as grammaticalized tense expressions in a sign language. The leaning forward is analyzed as the near future tense, and the slow leaning forward is the future in Korean Sign Language. There is neither a perfective aspect that expresses a global view of the event nor an imperfective, so such viewpoint aspects are not useful for distinguishing aspects in Korean Sign Language. On the other hand, from the perspective of phasal aspects, depending on the stages of progression of an event, there are prospective, inchoative, progressive, conclusive, completive, and resultative, which are also found in Korean Sign Language. In terms of tense and aspects in Korean Sign Language, it is analyzed that aspect is being grammaticalized into a more basic grammatical category, and tense is still in the early stages of grammaticalization. This is because the way of viewing temporal phases of events is more iconic and easier to recognize.
참고문헌 (34)
- 김희섭, "한국 표준 수화의 자연언어성 고찰 : 음운론을 중심으로", 언어과학, 3, pp.25~42 (1996)
- 목정수, "유형론과 정신역학론의 관점에서 본 한국어 서법과 양태", 한국어학, 70, pp.55~108 (2016), 한국어학회[DOI]
- 박진호, "시제, 상, 양태", 國語學, (60), pp.289~322 (2011), 국어학회[DOI]
- , 2023
- 서원희, "한국어와 한국수어의 상 대조 연구", 석사, pp.2020
- 石東一, "韓國 手話의 言語學的 분석", 박사, 특수교육학, pp.1990
- 석수영, "인지언어학 탐구의 현황과 과제", pp.403~420 (2019), 한국문화사
- 송미연, "TV뉴스 한국수화언어 통역의 통사·의미론적 분석", 석사, pp.2016
- 원성옥, "한국수어 문법" (2021), 국립국어원
- 윤병천, "한국수화의 비수지신호에 대한 언어학적 특성 연구", 특수교육저널:이론과 실천, 5(1), pp.253~277 (2004), 한국특수교육문제연구소
- 엄미숙, "한국수화의 통사론적 특징 분석", 석사, 특수교육학, pp.1997
- 이세은, "한국 수화의 상과 논항구조: 이동 동사를 중심으로", 석사, pp.2015
- 이준우, "한국 수어학 개론" (2012), 나남
- 이현근, "인지언어학 탐구의 현황과 과제", pp.699~721 (2019), 한국문화사
- 임지룡, "한국어 의미론" (2018), 한국문화사
- 정해권, "한국어 진행상과 결과상의 습득 연구 －‘-고 있-’과 ‘-어 있-’을 중심으로－", 새국어교육, (118), pp.257~280 (2019), 한국국어교육학회[DOI]
- 정해권, "한국어 문법상과 어휘상의 인지언어학적 접근", 담화와 인지, 28(3), pp.81~108 (2021), 담화·인지언어학회[DOI]
- 최상배, "한국수어의 이론" (2003), 서현사
- 허용, "대조언어학" (2013), 소통
- Boneh, N., "Syntax, lexical semantics and event Structure", pp.338~362 (2010), Oxford University Press
- Bybee, J. L., "형태론: 의미-형태의 관계에 대한 연구" (2000), 한국문화사
- Bybee, J., "문법의 진화: 시제, 상, 양태" (2010), 소통
- Comrie, B., "Aspect" (1976), Cambridge University Press
- Dahl, Ö., "Tense and aspect systems" (1985), Blackwell
- Dik, S. C., "The theory of functional grammar: The structure of the clause" (1997), Walter de Gruyter
- Lakoff, G., "Metaphor and Thought", pp.202~251 (1993), Cambridge University Press
- Nedjalkov, V., "Typology of Resultative Constructions", pp.3~62 (1988), John Benjamins Publishing
- Pfau, R., "Sign Language: An International Handbook" (2012), Mouton De Gruyter
- Radden, G., "Cognitive English Grammar" (2007), John Benjamins Publishing Company
- Smith, C. S., "The parameter of aspect" (1997), Kluwer
- Stokoe, W. C., "Semiotics and Human Sign Languages" (1972), Walter de Gruyter
- Sutton-Spence, R., "The Linguistics of British Sign Language: an Introduction" (1999), Cambridge University Press
- Whaley, L. J., "언어 유형론: 언어의 통일성과 다양성" (2010), 소통
- Zucchi, S., "Along the Time Line : Tense and Time Adverbs in Italian Sign Language", Natural Language Semantics, 17, pp.99~139 (2009)