Bound Noun pep in Korean
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper discusses the syntactic analysis of a bound noun pep in Korean. Song and Kim (2014) categorize four different meanings of pep – ‘law’, ‘way/how.to’, ‘conjecture/speculation’ and ‘naturalness’. They assume that the latter two meanings form a “bound-noun-complex” with the following restricted verbs (e.g., a copular verb i and a light verb ha). However, the seemingly morphological and syntactic characteristics of the target structures are not due to the bound noun pep but due to the following verbs (the copular and the light verb). Also, the restrictions are not limited to the bound noun pep. In this paper, I argue that there are three different structures with the bound noun pep based on its different meanings: i) it merges in N like normal nouns; ii) it also merges in N, subsequently moves to small n, and ultimately moves to ModEPIS; iii) it can be a head of C. Given that grammaticalization tends to go upward in a syntactic tree (Roberts and Roussou 2003, van Gelderen 2004), the proposal leads us to conclude that the bound noun pep is highly grammaticalized compared to other bound nouns.
Abstract
This paper discusses the syntactic analysis of a bound noun pep in Korean. Song and Kim (2014) categorize four different meanings of pep – ‘law’, ‘way/how.to’, ‘conjecture/speculation’ and ‘naturalness’. They assume that the latter two meanings form a “bound-noun-complex” with the following restricted verbs (e.g., a copular verb i and a light verb ha). However, the seemingly morphological and syntactic characteristics of the target structures are not due to the bound noun pep but due to the following verbs (the copular and the light verb). Also, the restrictions are not limited to the bound noun pep. In this paper, I argue that there are three different structures with the bound noun pep based on its different meanings: i) it merges in N like normal nouns; ii) it also merges in N, subsequently moves to small n, and ultimately moves to ModEPIS; iii) it can be a head of C. Given that grammaticalization tends to go upward in a syntactic tree (Roberts and Roussou 2003, van Gelderen 2004), the proposal leads us to conclude that the bound noun pep is highly grammaticalized compared to other bound nouns.
참고문헌 (12)
- Ahn, H.-K., "Hyentaykwukeuy uyconmyengsa yenkwu (‘A study on bound nouns in Present-Day Korean’)" (2001), Youkrack Pblishing
- Choe, H.-S., "Restructuring Parameters and Comlex Predicates; A Transformational Approach", Doctor, pp.1988
- Ha, I. -J., "NPI Licensing in Korean Modal Constructions", Japanese, 2007, pp.15, 312~323
- Hopper, P. J., "Grammaticalization" (2003), Cambridge University Press
- 김태식, "Bound Nouns, Ellipsis or Pro-form?", 생성문법연구, 26(1), pp.1~14 (2016), 한국생성문법학회[DOI]
- 김태식, "The Relationship between Semantic Bleaching and Syntax: A Case from Bound Noun cwung in Korean", 생성문법연구, 27(3), pp.565~589 (2017), 한국생성문법학회[DOI]
- 김태식, "Bound Noun kes in Korean, revisited", 생성문법연구, 31(3), pp.357~379 (2021), 한국생성문법학회[DOI]
- Palmer, F. R., "Mood and modality" (2001), Cambridge University Press
- Roberts, I., "Syntactic Change: A Minimalist Approach to Grammaticalization" (2003), Cambridge University Press
- Sohn, K.-W., "Negative Polarity items, Scope, and Economy" (1996), Thayhaksa
- Song, D. -H., "Hancae myengsa 'pep'uy mwunpephwa yangsang yenkwu (‘A Study on the Aspects of Grammaticalization of Sino-Korean Noun ’Beop’‘)", Studies in Linguistics, 33, pp.175~195 (2014)
- van Gelderen, E., "Grammaticalization as Economy" (2004), John Benjamins