Bound Noun kes in Korean, revisited
1
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper discusses the possibility that a Korean Bound Noun kes merges outside a nominal projection. Kim (2011, 2016) argues that the bound noun kes merges in a lexical N position and subsequently moves to a functional small n position based on the grammaticalization model proposed in Roberts and Roussou (2003) and van Gelderen (2004). Kim (2011, 2016) basically assumes that the bound noun kes is a nominal projection. However, we find additional data that the bound noun kes functions differently from a noun category. It can express epistemic modal meanings such as ‘regret/repentance’ and ‘speculation/conjecture’ (Chen 2013, Lee 2015, inter alia). Specifically, the bound noun kes with the ‘speculation/conjecture’ meaning is related to a ModP projection due to grammaticalization. I further assume that the bound noun kes is diachronically grammaticalized/reanlysed from ModP to CP. Thus, the bound noun kes can merge three different points with a clausal structure in contemporary Korean, which implies that the bound noun kes is highly grammaticalized compared to other bound nouns in Korean.
Abstract
This paper discusses the possibility that a Korean Bound Noun kes merges outside a nominal projection. Kim (2011, 2016) argues that the bound noun kes merges in a lexical N position and subsequently moves to a functional small n position based on the grammaticalization model proposed in Roberts and Roussou (2003) and van Gelderen (2004). Kim (2011, 2016) basically assumes that the bound noun kes is a nominal projection. However, we find additional data that the bound noun kes functions differently from a noun category. It can express epistemic modal meanings such as ‘regret/repentance’ and ‘speculation/conjecture’ (Chen 2013, Lee 2015, inter alia). Specifically, the bound noun kes with the ‘speculation/conjecture’ meaning is related to a ModP projection due to grammaticalization. I further assume that the bound noun kes is diachronically grammaticalized/reanlysed from ModP to CP. Thus, the bound noun kes can merge three different points with a clausal structure in contemporary Korean, which implies that the bound noun kes is highly grammaticalized compared to other bound nouns in Korean.
참고문헌 (18)
- Ahn, Hyo-Kyung, "Hyentaykwukeuy Uyconmyengsa Yenkwu (A Study on Bound Nouns in Present-Day Korean)" (2001), Youkrack Publishing
- Bae, Sun-Hee, "NP languages do not have NP-Ellipsis: examination of Korean and Japanese", Ms, pp.2012
- Choe, Hyun Sook, "Restructuring Parameters and Complex Predicates; A Transformational Approache", Doctor, pp.1988
- 최현숙, "On the Categorial Ambiguity of the Morpheme kes in Korean", 어학연구, 43(2), pp.229~264 (2007), 언어교육원
- 진염평, "의존명사 ‘것’의 이형태 ‘거", 걸’의 정립을 위한 시론, 2013, pp.41(4), 55~79[DOI]
- Downing, Angela, "A University Course in English Grammar" (1992), Prentice Hall international
- Grohmann, Kleanthes K., "Prolific Domains: On the Anti-Locality of Movement Dependencies", John Benjamins, Linguistik Aktuell, 2003, pp.66, ~
- Kim, Tae Sik, "Small Projections and Grammaticalization in Korean", Doctor, pp.2011
- 김태식, "Bound Noun swu in Korean", 생성문법연구, 24(2), pp.385~406 (2014), 한국생성문법학회[DOI]
- 김태식, "Bound Nouns, Ellipsis or Pro-form?", 생성문법연구, 26(1), pp.1~14 (2016), 한국생성문법학회[DOI]
- 이은섭, "의존 명사 ‘것’으로부터 도출된 몇몇 형식에 대한 고찰", 비교문화연구, 41, pp.245~273 (2015), 비교문화연구소[DOI]
- 오규환, "의존 명사 ‘것", 거’의 조사 결합형과 관련한 몇 문제, 2018, pp.(87), 185~210[DOI]
- 박소영, "한국어 동사구 대용의 통사론: ‘그리하다’와 ‘그러다’를 중심으로", 國語學, (81), pp.63~90 (2017), 국어학회[DOI]
- Roberts, Ian, "Syntactic Change: A Minimalist Approach to Grammaticalization" (2003), Cambridge University Press
- Schnieder, Benjamin, "Expressivism concerning epistemtic modals", The Philosopical Quarterly, 60, pp.601~615 (2010)
- Sohn, Keun-Won, "Negative Polarity Items, Scope, and Economy" (1996), Thayhaksa
- van Gelderen, Elly, "Grammaticalization as Economy" (2004), John Benjamins
- Yule, George, "Explaining English Grammar" (1998), Oxford University Press