Bound Noun cwul in Korean
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper discusses the synchronic and diachronic analysis of the bound noun cwul in Korean. Like other bound nouns, it needs to have some aid from other phrases. The main focus of previous studies centers around the meanings of the bound noun cwul, ‘way/ability’ and ‘factive/non-factive’ (An 2005, Hong 2003, Oh 2015, inter alia). However, the behavior of cwul differs between these two meanings: ‘factive/non-factive’ shows much wider distribution than ‘way/ability’ (An 2005, Hong 2003, Oh 2015, inter alia). A subject NPI with suppletive negation can be licensed in the case of ‘way/ability’, but ‘factive/non-factive’ does not allow this pattern. Also ‘non-factive’ is allowed to be at the sentence-final position in recent usages (Jung 2010). In this paper, I argue that the bound noun cwul has two different structures. ‘Way/ability’ has a similar structure to the bound noun swu given in Kim (2014) that an external argument does not merge in [Spec, vP], but in [Spec, TadnP] and subsequently moves to [Spec, nP]. On the other hand, ‘factive/non-factive’ diachronically underwent a structural reanalysis from N to C and became a complementizer.
Abstract
This paper discusses the synchronic and diachronic analysis of the bound noun cwul in Korean. Like other bound nouns, it needs to have some aid from other phrases. The main focus of previous studies centers around the meanings of the bound noun cwul, ‘way/ability’ and ‘factive/non-factive’ (An 2005, Hong 2003, Oh 2015, inter alia). However, the behavior of cwul differs between these two meanings: ‘factive/non-factive’ shows much wider distribution than ‘way/ability’ (An 2005, Hong 2003, Oh 2015, inter alia). A subject NPI with suppletive negation can be licensed in the case of ‘way/ability’, but ‘factive/non-factive’ does not allow this pattern. Also ‘non-factive’ is allowed to be at the sentence-final position in recent usages (Jung 2010). In this paper, I argue that the bound noun cwul has two different structures. ‘Way/ability’ has a similar structure to the bound noun swu given in Kim (2014) that an external argument does not merge in [Spec, vP], but in [Spec, TadnP] and subsequently moves to [Spec, nP]. On the other hand, ‘factive/non-factive’ diachronically underwent a structural reanalysis from N to C and became a complementizer.
참고문헌 (24)
- Abe, Yasuaki, "Dethematized subjects and property ascription in Japanese", Proceedings of the 1992 Asian Conference on Lnaguage, Information and Computation, pp.132~144 (1992), Thayhaksa
- 안정아, "의존 명사 ‘수’와 ‘줄’의 의미 연구", 어문논집, 52, pp.121~145 (2005), 민족어문학회
- Choe, Hyun-Sook, "Restructuring Parameters and Complex Predicates; A Transformational Approache", Doctor, pp.1988
- 정대호, "Korean Modal V-(u)l swu", li iss, 생성문법연구, pp.2007, 17(4)[DOI]
- 정대호, "On Polarity Licensing in the -ul swu iss Construction", 생성문법연구, 27(3), pp.457~484 (2017), 한국생성문법학회[DOI]
- 정혜선, "중세국어 의존명사 ‘줄’ 구성 연구", 한국어학, 80, pp.235~257 (2018), 한국어학회[DOI]
- "Dcinside" (2020)[URL]
- Grimsahw, Jane, "Light verbs and θ-marking", Linguistic Inquiry, 19(2), pp.205~232 (1988)
- Ha, Iljoo, "NPI licensing in korean modal constructions", Japanese, 2007, pp.15, 312~323
- Hong, Sah-man, "Cwungsey·kuntaykwuke uyconmyengsa {cwul} uy pwunphowa uymi (The distribution and meaning of bound noun {줄} in Middle and Modern Korean", Yengnamhak, 3, pp.263~304 (2003)
- Hornstein, Nobert, "Movement and control", Linguistic Inquiry, 30, pp.69~96 (1999)
- 정한데로, "‘형식명사＋-요’ 구성에 관한 소고(小考) - 인터넷 통신 언어를 중심으로 -", 언어와 정보 사회, 13, pp.37~65 (2010), 언어정보연구소[DOI]
- Kim, Tae Sik, "Small Projections and Grammaticalization in Korean", Doctor, pp.2011
- 김태식, "Bound Noun swu in Korean", 생성문법연구, 24(2), pp.385~406 (2014), 한국생성문법학회[DOI]
- 김태식, "Bound Nouns, Ellipsis or Pro-form?", 생성문법연구, 26(1), pp.1~14 (2016), 한국생성문법학회[DOI]
- 김태식, "Bound Noun swu in Korean, a Nominative Complex Noun Phrase or a Grammaticalized Noun: A Reply to Tchoe (2015)", 생성문법연구, 26(4), pp.407~425 (2016), 한국생성문법학회[DOI]
- 김태식, "Bound Noun swu in Korean, from a Perspective of Grammaticalization: A Reply to Chung (2017)", 생성문법연구, 28(1), pp.69~90 (2018), 한국생성문법학회[DOI]
- 오민석, "現代國語 依存名詞 ‘줄’의 統辭와 意味", 어문연구(語文硏究), 43(1), pp.89~120 (2015), 한국어문교육연구회[DOI]
- Roberts, Ian, "Syntactic Change: A Minimalist Approach to Grammaticalization" (2003), Cambridge University Press
- Saito, Mamoru, "Non-Nominative Subjects", pp.103~118 (2004), John Benjamins
- Sohn, Keun-Won, "Negative Polarity Items, Scope, and Economy" (1996), Thayhaksa
- 최준수, "“∼ㄹ", 을 수(가) 있다”: 우리말 관형절이 있는 주격 복합명사구, 2015, pp.25(1), 81~108[DOI]
- van Gelderen, Elly, "Grammaticalization as Economy" (2004), John Benjamins
- "Unbalance 15" (2020)[URL]