Bound Noun cis in Korean
2
조회
0
다운로드
10
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper starts from the examination of categorial status of cis in Korean and argues that cis is not a free noun, but a bound noun. Cis shows typical behaviors as a bound noun: it cannot stand alone in a sentence, but requires the aid of other lexical items such as possessors, adjuncts, and complements. Further, adopting the movement analysis from a lexical N position to a functional small n position given in Kim (2011, 2016) for a bound noun kes in Korean, I show that the same analysis can be applied to the bound noun cis. The movement is motivated by the metaphorical/abstract meaning of cis, since the small n is more related to a functional meaning rather than a lexical meaning. In terms of grammaticalization, I argue that both kes and cis are closer to functional items and they are in the stage between a fully lexical item and a more functional item.
Abstract
This paper starts from the examination of categorial status of cis in Korean and argues that cis is not a free noun, but a bound noun. Cis shows typical behaviors as a bound noun: it cannot stand alone in a sentence, but requires the aid of other lexical items such as possessors, adjuncts, and complements. Further, adopting the movement analysis from a lexical N position to a functional small n position given in Kim (2011, 2016) for a bound noun kes in Korean, I show that the same analysis can be applied to the bound noun cis. The movement is motivated by the metaphorical/abstract meaning of cis, since the small n is more related to a functional meaning rather than a lexical meaning. In terms of grammaticalization, I argue that both kes and cis are closer to functional items and they are in the stage between a fully lexical item and a more functional item.
참고문헌 (9)
- Grimshaw, Jane, "Light Verbs and Θ-Marking", Linguistic Inquiry, 19(2), pp.205~232 (1988)
- Grohmann, Kleanthes K., "Prolific Domains: On the Anti-Locality of Movement Dependencies, John Benjamins", Linguistik Aktuell, 2003, pp.66, ~
- Hopper, Paul J., "Grammaticalization" (2003), Cambridge University Press
- Kim, Tae Sik., "Small Projections and Grammaticalization in Korean", Doctor, pp.2011
- 김태식, "Bound Noun swu in Korean", 생성문법연구, 24(2), pp.385~406 (2014), 한국생성문법학회
- 김태식, "Bound Nouns, Ellipsis or Pro-form?", 생성문법연구, 26(1), pp.1~14 (2016), 한국생성문법학회[DOI]
- Roberts, Ian, "Syntactic Change: A Minimalist Approach to Grammaticalization" (2003), Cambridge University Press
- van Gelderen, Elly., "Grammaticalization as Economy" (2004), John Benjamins
- Watanabe, Akira, "Functional Projections of Nominals in Japanese : Syntax of Classifiers", Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 24, pp.241~306 (2006)