본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

淸 中期 羅敎 庵堂의 宗敎ㆍ社會的 機能에 관하여

On the Religious and Social Functions of Luojiao Temples(羅敎庵堂) in Mid-Qing Period

1

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류역사학

초록

Luojiao(羅敎), which orginated in mid-Ming(明) period at Miyun district(密雲縣), nothern Zhili(直隸), by mid-Qing(淸) period was disseminated to Zhejiang(浙江), Jiangsu(江蘇), Jiangxi(江西), and Fujian(福建) of southern China, through various routes. The spread of Luojiao was accompanied by temple(庵堂)-building, so I suggest that the both were closely related with each other. It is worthy to note that these Luojiao temples, after Luozu(羅祖)’s opening of a temple, were established not only at big towns such as Hangzhou(杭州) and Suzhou(蘇州) related with Grand Canal, but remote and secluded places in the mountains and areas of dwellers of make-shift huts(棚民) of inland area over Zhejiang(浙江), Jiangsu(江蘇), Jiangxi(江西), and Fujian province(福建省). Among the functions of Luojiao temples, needless to say that they had the function of propagation by satisfying people's religious desires, there were functions of mutual assistance among adherents and of providing social security for adherents who left native place and were not under the protection of kinship. Life and death of drifting homeless peoples such as boatmen of tribute fleets(漕運水手) and dwellers of make-shift huts(棚民) were deeply related with these temples. But the supports such as a surrogate family to turn to in old age, caring for the sick, and funeral rites and cemeteries by temples were given, I suggest, provided that the beneficiaries had subscribed a substantial sum of money to the temples or labored for cultivation of tillage belonging to the temples. The temples provided boatmen of the tribute fleets, drifting homeless peoples with the profound sense of comfort. At the last stage of reign of Emperor Qian-long, socioeconomic development reached the limits and the contradictions grew more and more intensifying. Under the such circumstances, founding temples was related with the movement for drifting homeless peoples to attempt to establish their own stable bases. Until the destruction of Luojiao temples in 1768(the 33rd year of Qian-long's reign), the nature of the boatmen's organization is consistent. With the suppression of Qing government, however, the religious nature of Luojiao boatmen of tribute fleets was eliminated, and only characteristics as a underground anti-governmental, secret society which massed with economic interests remained. Later, this society shifted into Qingbang(Green Gang: 靑幇). In 1768, confronting with Queue-cutting cases(割辮案) which originated in Jiangnan provinces, spread Shandong province and played a role in the collective fear, Emperor Qian-long ordered to suppress popular religions thoroughly. As the result, a severe blow was struck to groups of popular religions and they were eradicated. The other popular religions which outlived the oppress turned more and more underground secret societies. It seems that such a way of managing groups of popular religions played a role as a clue in bringing about Wang-lun(王倫)'s uprising in 1774 and the rebellion of 1796-1805. Such political measures for the maintenance of Qing's reign, on the contrary, gave rise to social unrest and gave way for the collapse of the regime. It is noteworthy that popular religions survived all the suppress, so we are incapable of knowing how they were deeply rooted in the society.

Abstract

Luojiao(羅敎), which orginated in mid-Ming(明) period at Miyun district(密雲縣), nothern Zhili(直隸), by mid-Qing(淸) period was disseminated to Zhejiang(浙江), Jiangsu(江蘇), Jiangxi(江西), and Fujian(福建) of southern China, through various routes. The spread of Luojiao was accompanied by temple(庵堂)-building, so I suggest that the both were closely related with each other. It is worthy to note that these Luojiao temples, after Luozu(羅祖)’s opening of a temple, were established not only at big towns such as Hangzhou(杭州) and Suzhou(蘇州) related with Grand Canal, but remote and secluded places in the mountains and areas of dwellers of make-shift huts(棚民) of inland area over Zhejiang(浙江), Jiangsu(江蘇), Jiangxi(江西), and Fujian province(福建省). Among the functions of Luojiao temples, needless to say that they had the function of propagation by satisfying people's religious desires, there were functions of mutual assistance among adherents and of providing social security for adherents who left native place and were not under the protection of kinship. Life and death of drifting homeless peoples such as boatmen of tribute fleets(漕運水手) and dwellers of make-shift huts(棚民) were deeply related with these temples. But the supports such as a surrogate family to turn to in old age, caring for the sick, and funeral rites and cemeteries by temples were given, I suggest, provided that the beneficiaries had subscribed a substantial sum of money to the temples or labored for cultivation of tillage belonging to the temples. The temples provided boatmen of the tribute fleets, drifting homeless peoples with the profound sense of comfort. At the last stage of reign of Emperor Qian-long, socioeconomic development reached the limits and the contradictions grew more and more intensifying. Under the such circumstances, founding temples was related with the movement for drifting homeless peoples to attempt to establish their own stable bases. Until the destruction of Luojiao temples in 1768(the 33rd year of Qian-long's reign), the nature of the boatmen's organization is consistent. With the suppression of Qing government, however, the religious nature of Luojiao boatmen of tribute fleets was eliminated, and only characteristics as a underground anti-governmental, secret society which massed with economic interests remained. Later, this society shifted into Qingbang(Green Gang: 靑幇). In 1768, confronting with Queue-cutting cases(割辮案) which originated in Jiangnan provinces, spread Shandong province and played a role in the collective fear, Emperor Qian-long ordered to suppress popular religions thoroughly. As the result, a severe blow was struck to groups of popular religions and they were eradicated. The other popular religions which outlived the oppress turned more and more underground secret societies. It seems that such a way of managing groups of popular religions played a role as a clue in bringing about Wang-lun(王倫)'s uprising in 1774 and the rebellion of 1796-1805. Such political measures for the maintenance of Qing's reign, on the contrary, gave rise to social unrest and gave way for the collapse of the regime. It is noteworthy that popular religions survived all the suppress, so we are incapable of knowing how they were deeply rooted in the society.

참고문헌 (54)

  1. Hubert Seiwert, "Popular Religious Movements and Heterodox Sects in Chinese History", China Studies, 3, pp.215~216 (2003), Brill Leiden
  2. 塚本善隆, "羅敎の成立と流傳について", 東方學報, 17 (1949)
  3. Hubert Seiwert, (2003)
  4. 韓秉方, "罗教及其社会影响", 世界宗教研究, pp.45~ (1994)
  5. Wolfram Eberhard, "Temple-building Activities in Medieval and Modern China-an Experimental Study", Monumenta Serica, 23, pp.264~318 (1964)
  6. David E. Kelley, "Temples and Tribute Fleets-The Luo Sect and Boatmen's Associations in the Eigthteenth Century-", Modern China, 3, pp.384~ (1982)
  7. 鈴木中正, "羅敎について―淸代支那宗敎結社の一例― in: 東洋文化硏究所紀要 第1冊" (1943)
  8. 塚本善隆, "羅敎の成立と流傳について", 東方學報, 17 (1949)
  9. 森田明, "淸代水手結社の性格について", 東洋史硏究, 13(5) (1955)
  10. 戴玄之, "老官齋", 大陸雜誌, 34(6) (1977)
  11. 赫治淸, "中國幫會史", pp.220~ (1985), 文津出版
  12. 密藏道開, "五部六冊 in: 藏逸經書標目", pp.444~
  13. 馬西沙, "中國民間宗敎史" (1992), 上海人民出版社
  14. 王見川, ""五部六冊" 刊刻略表", 民間宗敎, 1, pp.161~172
  15. 赫治淸, , ~ (1985)
  16. "錄副奏摺", ~
  17. 雲棲袾宏撰, "無爲卷 in: 正訛集"
  18. 荒木見悟, , pp.4959~4960 (1984), 中文出版社
  19. "塚本善隆", ~ (1949)
  20. "硃批奏摺, 乾隆十三年十一月二十四日江西巡撫開泰奏摺", ~
  21. "南宮書牘 卷4"
  22. 永德摺, "羅敎案", 史料旬刊, 12, pp.天404左~ (1919)
  23. 彰寶摺, "江蘇長生敎案", 史料旬刊, 13, pp.天450右~ (1919)
  24. "硃批奏摺, 乾隆13년 11월 24일 江西巡撫開泰奏摺", ~
  25. 新柱摺, "老官齋案", 史料旬刊, 27 (1920)
  26. Marjorie Topley, "Chinese Women's Vegetarian Houses in Singapore", Journal Malayan Branch, 1152 (1954), Royal Asatic Society
  27. 박원호, "明史食貨志譯註" (2008), 소명출판
  28. 표교열, "청 중기 조운 개혁론 연구", 박사, pp.1995
  29. 羅敎案, "崔應階摺", 史料旬刊, 12 (1919), 故宮博物院 文獻館
  30. 羅敎案, "永德摺", 史料旬刊, 12 (1919), 故宮博物院 文獻館
  31. "江蘇大乘無爲二敎案", 史料旬刊, 15, pp.522~527 (1919)
  32. 淸代 龍華會 史料 選編, "浙江總兵史弘蘊爲報拿獲開堂設敎之周喜吉事奏摺(乾隆 18年 7月 13日)", 歷史檔案 (2000), 中國第一歷史檔案館
  33. "淸實錄 卷818", pp.1089~
  34. 吳琦, "淸代漕運水手行帮會社的形成: 從庵堂到老堂船", 江漢論壇 (2002)
  35. 羅敎案, "抄錄刑部咨文(原文)", 史料旬刊, 2 (1919), 故宮博物院 文獻館
  36. 老官齋案, "喀爾吉善ㆍ潘思榘摺(건륭13년 6월 26일)", 史料旬刊, 29, pp.66~67 (1920)
  37. 老官齋案, "訥親摺二(건륭13년 3월 초3일)", 史料旬刊, 27, pp.963~ (1920)
  38. 老官齋案, "新柱等摺", 史料旬刊, 28, pp.32~33 (1920)
  39. 凌燽, "棚民編保及禁緝私鹽議詳(江西視臬紀事(選錄)", 淸史資料, 3, pp.202~203, 中國社會科學院歷史硏究所淸史硏究室編
  40. 老官齋案, "訥親摺三(건륭13년 3월 27일)", 史料旬刊, 28, pp.30~ (1920)
  41. 老官齋案, "喀爾吉善ㆍ潘思榘摺(건륭13년 6월 26일)", 史料旬刊, 29, pp.66~ (1920)
  42. 老官齋案, "新柱摺(건륭13년 3월 14일)", 史料旬刊, 27, pp.967~ (1920)
  43. 羅敎案, "永德摺二(건륭33년 9월 28일)", 史料旬刊, 12 (1919)
  44. 羅敎案, "崔應階摺(건륭33년 11월 30일)", 史料旬刊, 12 (1919)
  45. 査律載, "一應左道異端之術煽惑人民爲首者絞監候", ~
  46. 彰寶摺, "江蘇大乘無爲二敎案", 史料旬刊, 15 (1919)
  47. 谷井俊仁, "乾隆時代の廣域犯罪事件と國家の對應―割辮案の社會史的素描―", 史林, 70(6) (1987)
  48. 필립쿤, "영혼을 훔치는 사람들―1768년 중국을 뒤흔든 공포와 광기―" (2004), 책과함께
  49. "江浙長生敎案", 史料旬刊, 15 (1919)
  50. "江浙長生敎案", 史料旬刊, 13 (1919)
  51. "江浙長生敎案", 史料旬刊, 15, pp.528~530 (1919)
  52. "淸實錄 卷821, 乾隆33年10月下辛未", pp.1142~1143
  53. "淸代 龍華會史料選編", 歷史檔案 (2000), 中國第一歷史檔案館
  54. 유장근, "민간종교 in: 명청시대 사회경제사", pp.421~ (2007), 이산

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (6건)