본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

乾隆年間 天主敎 탄압의 실제와 天主敎 共同體

The Realities of Catholic Suppression and the Catholic Community in Qianlong Reign

2

조회

0

다운로드

3

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류역사학

초록

In this paper, I looked at the actual aspects of Catholic persecution conducted in Qianlong reign, and looked at how the Catholic community was able to survive even in persecution, from a religious perspective as well as from a political, social and economic perspective. Those who suppressed the Catholic were its relatives, neighbors, government officials and emperor Qianlong. In the Ming-Qing era, the trend of filing lawsuits was popular, but there were many cases in which ordinary people hesitated to file charges or file. They chose a third relationship with Catholics that coexist in the blood linked community and local community, whether they like it or not, if possible. Most of the officials oppressed Catholics, but some of them chose a third relationship with the Western missionaries in Beijing, which was acquiesced without joining the crackdown. Emperor Qianlong gave so called ‘exceptional grace’(格外之恩) to Western missionaries standing by his side. He showed clemency to them from the view point of China being the center of the world. Emperor Qianlong was a oppressor of Catholicism, but on the other hand, he also established a third relationship that let the Catholic to be maintained. It is hard to understand the relationship between the Qing Dynasty in Qianlong reign and Catholicism from the dichotomous view of persecuting and persecuted. Only when we establish a third relationship of symbiosis, acquiescence and so called ‘exceptional grace’, we can understand it correctly. Among the Catholic communities scattered throughout China, the community in Beijing, the capital city, was safer than the other communities in the third relationship allowed by Emperor Qianlong. In the event of the Catholic oppression, Western missionaries tried to protect the entire Chinese Catholic community through political activity. In addition to the religious motivation of avoiding oppression, the Mahanshan Catholic community in Gucheng County, Hubei Province, emerged amid the social and economic trend of developing a mountain area in Hubei Province. Catholics in the Mabanshan community reclaimed land under poor conditions by jointly working on the distributed land. The Mabansan community could continue to exist because of relatively weak suppression of the Qing Dynasty in spite of the low productivity of the crop. The Jingdezhen Catholic community emerged amid social and economic trends in which small and medium-sized cities appeared and grew, in various parts of China during the Ming-Qing era. The ceramic makers and workers, who are the main members of the Jingdezhen Catholic community, were mostly migrants who came from other district. They had low wages. So I lived in poverty in Jingdezhen where prices were high. So mutual assistance served as a key factor in making the Jingdezhen community exist. The way in which Catholic communities survive in response to the suppression of the Qing was quite different, depending on the political, social and economic conditions of each of them. However, there was also a factor that brought them together. It was a religious aspect shared by each community. These include Catholicism's religious life and the itinerant activities of Western missionaries. Catholics lived a religious life at home, removing ancestral tablets and following their daily routines. Catholics in the area where missionaries and internal priests reside regularly held sacred ceremonies at churches and small gatherings. In areas other than that, holy rites were performed only when priests toured. Western missionaries disciplined those who betrayed their religion, re-engaged those who repented, took care of those who suffered while keeping faith. The religious life of Catholics and the itinerant activities of Western missionaries were elements shared among all the Catholic communities in China. At the same time, it was also the most fundamental factor that allowed the Catholic community to maintain.

Abstract

In this paper, I looked at the actual aspects of Catholic persecution conducted in Qianlong reign, and looked at how the Catholic community was able to survive even in persecution, from a religious perspective as well as from a political, social and economic perspective. Those who suppressed the Catholic were its relatives, neighbors, government officials and emperor Qianlong. In the Ming-Qing era, the trend of filing lawsuits was popular, but there were many cases in which ordinary people hesitated to file charges or file. They chose a third relationship with Catholics that coexist in the blood linked community and local community, whether they like it or not, if possible. Most of the officials oppressed Catholics, but some of them chose a third relationship with the Western missionaries in Beijing, which was acquiesced without joining the crackdown. Emperor Qianlong gave so called ‘exceptional grace’(格外之恩) to Western missionaries standing by his side. He showed clemency to them from the view point of China being the center of the world. Emperor Qianlong was a oppressor of Catholicism, but on the other hand, he also established a third relationship that let the Catholic to be maintained. It is hard to understand the relationship between the Qing Dynasty in Qianlong reign and Catholicism from the dichotomous view of persecuting and persecuted. Only when we establish a third relationship of symbiosis, acquiescence and so called ‘exceptional grace’, we can understand it correctly. Among the Catholic communities scattered throughout China, the community in Beijing, the capital city, was safer than the other communities in the third relationship allowed by Emperor Qianlong. In the event of the Catholic oppression, Western missionaries tried to protect the entire Chinese Catholic community through political activity. In addition to the religious motivation of avoiding oppression, the Mahanshan Catholic community in Gucheng County, Hubei Province, emerged amid the social and economic trend of developing a mountain area in Hubei Province. Catholics in the Mabanshan community reclaimed land under poor conditions by jointly working on the distributed land. The Mabansan community could continue to exist because of relatively weak suppression of the Qing Dynasty in spite of the low productivity of the crop. The Jingdezhen Catholic community emerged amid social and economic trends in which small and medium-sized cities appeared and grew, in various parts of China during the Ming-Qing era. The ceramic makers and workers, who are the main members of the Jingdezhen Catholic community, were mostly migrants who came from other district. They had low wages. So I lived in poverty in Jingdezhen where prices were high. So mutual assistance served as a key factor in making the Jingdezhen community exist. The way in which Catholic communities survive in response to the suppression of the Qing was quite different, depending on the political, social and economic conditions of each of them. However, there was also a factor that brought them together. It was a religious aspect shared by each community. These include Catholicism's religious life and the itinerant activities of Western missionaries. Catholics lived a religious life at home, removing ancestral tablets and following their daily routines. Catholics in the area where missionaries and internal priests reside regularly held sacred ceremonies at churches and small gatherings. In areas other than that, holy rites were performed only when priests toured. Western missionaries disciplined those who betrayed their religion, re-engaged those who repented, took care of those who suffered while keeping faith. The religious life of Catholics and the itinerant activities of Western missionaries were elements shared among all the Catholic communities in China. At the same time, it was also the most fundamental factor that allowed the Catholic community to maintain.

참고문헌 (43)

  1. "高宗實錄" (1986), 中華書局
  2. 乾隆, "大淸會典", 文淵閣 四庫全書 影印本, ~
  3. 北京圖書館金石組, "北京圖書館藏中國歷代石刻拓本匯編 第70冊" (1990), 中州古籍出版社
  4. 杜赫德, "耶蘇會士中國書簡集-中國回憶錄 第1冊~第6冊" (2005), 大象出版社
  5. 中國第一歷史檔案館, "淸中前期西洋天主敎在華活動檔案史料 第1冊" (2003), 中華書局
  6. 中國第一歷史檔案館, "明淸時期澳門問題檔案文獻匯編 (一)" (1999), 人民出版社
  7. Adrien Launay, "Journal D’ André Ly, prêtre, chinois, missionnaire et notaire apostolique, 1746-1763" (1906)
  8. 吳金成, "中國近世社會經濟史硏究-明代紳士層의 形成과 社會經濟的 役割" (1986), 一潮閣
  9. 吳金成, "矛・盾의 共存-明淸時代 江西社會 硏究-" (2007), 知識産業社
  10. 장중례, "중국의 신사" (1993), 신서원
  11. 田汝康, "공자의 이름으로 죽은 여인들" (1999), 예문서원
  12. 후안 카트레트, "예수회역사" (1994), 이냐시오영성연구소
  13. 費賴之, "明淸間在華耶蘇會士列傳 1552-1773 下" (1997), 天主敎上海敎區光啓社
  14. 費賴之, "在華耶蘇會士列傳及書目 下" (1995), 中華書局
  15. 徐宗澤, "中國天主敎傳敎士槪論" (2010), 上海書店
  16. 梁其姿, "施善與敎化 : 明淸的慈善組織" (2001), 河北敎育出版社
  17. 張建民, "湖北通史(明淸卷)" (1999), 華中師範大學出版社
  18. 張建民, "明淸長江流域山區資源開發與環境演變-以秦嶺大巴山區爲中心" (2007), 武漢大學出版社
  19. 張先淸, "官府, 宗族與天主敎 : 17-19世紀福安鄕村敎會的歷史敍事" (2009), 中華書局
  20. 周秋光, "中國慈善簡史" (2006), 人民出版社
  21. 福武直, "中國農村社會の構造" (1976), 東京大學出版會
  22. 夫馬進, "中國訴訟社會史の硏究" (2011), 東京大學學術出版會
  23. 夫馬進, "中國善會善堂史の硏究" (1997), 同朋舍
  24. Heuken, Adolf SJ, "Historical Sites of Jakarta" (2000), Cipta Loka Caraka
  25. Hsiao, Kung-chuan, "Rural China : Imperial Control in the Nineteenth Century" (1972), Univ. of Washington Press
  26. Willeke, Bernward H., "Imperial Government And Catholic Missions In China During The Years 1784-1785" (1948), The Franciscan Institute
  27. 김선혜, "명청시대사회경제사" (2007), 이산
  28. 徐永大, "中國과 韓國의 城隍信仰 比較", 中國史硏究, 12 (2001)
  29. 이준갑, "乾隆49년(1784)~50년(1785)의 敎案과 天主敎共同體", 동양사학연구, (117), pp.163~217 (2011), 동양사학회
  30. 이준갑, "乾隆49年(1784)〜51年(1786)의 敎案과 乾隆帝", 동양사학연구, (121), pp.229~313 (2012), 동양사학회
  31. 이준갑, "嘉慶年間(1796~1820)의 天主敎 傳播와 淸朝의 對應", 명청사연구, (45), pp.183~244 (2016), 명청사학회[DOI]
  32. 鄭哲雄, "淸代 川湖陝 交界 山間地域의 經濟開發과 그 성격", 중국사연구, (41), pp.205~242 (2006), 중국사학회
  33. 정철웅, "淸代 川,湖,陝 交界地域의 經濟開發과 民間風俗(Ⅱ)", 동양사학연구, (87), pp.111~141 (2004), 동양사학회
  34. 康志杰, "關于湖北磨盤山神權社會的考察", 世界宗敎硏究, 2004(3) (2004)
  35. 鞠德源, "清欽天監監正劉松齡—紀念南斯拉夫天文學家劉松齡逝世二百一十周年", 故宫博物院院刊, 1985(1) (1985)
  36. 靳煜, "乾隆年間三次 西域測繪再分析", 西域硏究, 2016(1) (2016)
  37. 吳伯婭, "有關乾隆朝大敎案的幾個問題", 中華文史論叢, 69 (2002)
  38. 吳伯婭, "澳門與乾隆朝大教案", “16—18世纪中西關係與澳門”國際學術硏討會論文集 (2003)
  39. 王曉, "咸豊三年欽天監敎案考述", 溫州大學學報(社會科學版), 24(2) (2011)
  40. 馮立升, "乾隆時期西北地區的天文大地測量及其意義", 中國邊疆史地硏究, 1999(3) (1999)
  41. 矢澤利彦, "乾隆四十九・五十年の天主敎禁壓", 埼玉大學紀要(社會科學篇), 7 (1958)
  42. 陳寶良, "中國訴訟社會史の硏究" (2011), 東京大學學術出版會
  43. Witek, John W., "Encounters and Dialogues : Changing Perspectives on Chinese-Western Exchanges from the Sixteenth to Eighteenth Centuries" (2005), Sanki Augustin, and The Ricci Institute of Chinese-Western Cultural History at University of San Francisco

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (12건)