조선시대 국제질서와 해양정책
World Order and Maritime policy in the Joseon period
0
조회
0
다운로드
6
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In the ancient times, where transportation and communication means were not developed, they interacted with the surrounding area through active maritime activities(海洋活動), and it was the influx of culture and the channel of propagation. Even if it is not necessarily a developmental historical viewpoint, if the transportation, communication, and various ship technologies have not declined, the maritime activities will be reduced as ancient times and modern times, and the maritime activities in the Joseon period(朝鮮時代) can not be said to be active. With the expansion of the state organization and the improvement of the governing system, the ocean showed a history path that would eventually turn into a path of danger in the path of infinite opportunities. That is looked Goryo(高麗), which was trying to expand the nation's financial power through trade through the establishment of aristocratic bureaucracy, actively engaged in maritime activities centering on trade routes, while Joseon, which can be said to have completed a more complete regime, tended not to engage in maritime activities. Despite the era of active maritime activities against the world history, the fact that the maritime activities of the Joseon were not active could be analyzed from various aspects. There is a reason for the internal stability of Confucian rule and social order stability based on farming, and there is also reason for the externally to be sensitive to the international order of East Asia which is Ming world order(明 中心 國際秩序), Ming-Qing Transition period(明淸交替期), Qing world order(淸 中心 國際秩序), and to recognize various marine factors and develop the maritime policy carefully. In the rapidly changing international order and situation in the Joseon period, Joseon sought a aristocrat bureaucratic society(兩班官僚社會) with the national security and the King as the peak. In the early days of the founding, Joseon established various national policies to solve the conflicts and tensions of the Ming and to establish a system of governance and systems. In this process, Joseon experienced history related marine such as Japanese raiders(倭寇), drifting people(漂流民), Jeju Island(濟州道), conquest of Tsushima(對馬島征伐) and Imjin War(壬辰戰爭). In the midst of the Ming-Qing Transition period, Joseon resumed diplomatic relations with Japan, and became a member of the Qing world order under the influence of the Manchu invasion of Joseon in 1627(丁卯胡亂), and the Manchu invasion of Joseon in 1636(丙子胡亂) caused by Ming general is illegally occupy the Ga island(椵島). For the oppressive diplomacy of the Qing, the Joseon used political and military affairs of the Japanese situation connected with the maritime forces of southern. Under the Qing world order, the Joseon actively responded to illegal fishing activities(不法漁業活動) and grasped overseas information through policy on drifting people(漂流民).
Abstract
In the ancient times, where transportation and communication means were not developed, they interacted with the surrounding area through active maritime activities(海洋活動), and it was the influx of culture and the channel of propagation. Even if it is not necessarily a developmental historical viewpoint, if the transportation, communication, and various ship technologies have not declined, the maritime activities will be reduced as ancient times and modern times, and the maritime activities in the Joseon period(朝鮮時代) can not be said to be active. With the expansion of the state organization and the improvement of the governing system, the ocean showed a history path that would eventually turn into a path of danger in the path of infinite opportunities. That is looked Goryo(高麗), which was trying to expand the nation's financial power through trade through the establishment of aristocratic bureaucracy, actively engaged in maritime activities centering on trade routes, while Joseon, which can be said to have completed a more complete regime, tended not to engage in maritime activities. Despite the era of active maritime activities against the world history, the fact that the maritime activities of the Joseon were not active could be analyzed from various aspects. There is a reason for the internal stability of Confucian rule and social order stability based on farming, and there is also reason for the externally to be sensitive to the international order of East Asia which is Ming world order(明 中心 國際秩序), Ming-Qing Transition period(明淸交替期), Qing world order(淸 中心 國際秩序), and to recognize various marine factors and develop the maritime policy carefully. In the rapidly changing international order and situation in the Joseon period, Joseon sought a aristocrat bureaucratic society(兩班官僚社會) with the national security and the King as the peak. In the early days of the founding, Joseon established various national policies to solve the conflicts and tensions of the Ming and to establish a system of governance and systems. In this process, Joseon experienced history related marine such as Japanese raiders(倭寇), drifting people(漂流民), Jeju Island(濟州道), conquest of Tsushima(對馬島征伐) and Imjin War(壬辰戰爭). In the midst of the Ming-Qing Transition period, Joseon resumed diplomatic relations with Japan, and became a member of the Qing world order under the influence of the Manchu invasion of Joseon in 1627(丁卯胡亂), and the Manchu invasion of Joseon in 1636(丙子胡亂) caused by Ming general is illegally occupy the Ga island(椵島). For the oppressive diplomacy of the Qing, the Joseon used political and military affairs of the Japanese situation connected with the maritime forces of southern. Under the Qing world order, the Joseon actively responded to illegal fishing activities(不法漁業活動) and grasped overseas information through policy on drifting people(漂流民).
참고문헌 (85)
- "고려사", ~
- "조선태종실록", ~
- "조선세종실록", ~
- "조선문종실록", ~
- "海東諸國記", ~
- "경국대전", ~
- "東萊府接倭狀啓謄錄可考事目抄冊", ~
- "청태종실록", ~
- "조선인조실록", ~
- 강봉룡, "바다에 새겨진 한국사" (2005), 한얼미디어
- 고용희, "바다에서 본 탐라의 역사" (2006), 도서출판 각
- 국립제주박물관, "탐라와 유구왕국", 국립제주박물관, ~ (2007)
- 김성준, "한국항해선박사" (2014), 도서출판 문현
- 朝鮮王朝 軍船硏究, "김재근", 한국문화연구소, ~ (1977)
- 김재근, "韓國船舶史硏究" (1984), 서울대출판부
- 남도영, "한국마정사", 한국마사회 마사박물관, ~ (1996)
- 윤성익, "명대 왜구의 연구" (2007), 경인문화사
- 이문기, "한ㆍ중ㆍ일의 해양인식과 해금" (2007), 동북아역사재단
- 이민웅, "임진해전사" (2004), 청어람미디어
- 이원식, "한국의 배" (1990), 大圓社
- 이훈, "朝鮮後期漂流民과 韓日關係" (2000), 國學資料院
- 정성일, "전라도와 일본 : 조선시대 해난사고 분석" (2013), 경인문화사
- 정진술, "다시보는 한국해양사" (2008), 도서출판 신서원
- 조영록, "한중문화교류와 남방해로" (1997), 국학자료원
- 주경철, "대항해 시대(해상 팽창과 근대 세계의 형성)" (2008), 서울대학교출판부
- 최완기, "한국의 전통 선박 한선" (2006), 이화여자대학교출판부
- 하우봉, "조선시대 해양국가와의 교류사" (2014), 경인문화사
- 한명기, "임진왜란과 한중관계" (1999), 역사비평사
- 한정훈, "조선시대 교통운수사 연구" (2013), 혜안
- 현명철, "해양사연구방법론" (2013), 학연출판사
- 강봉룡, "해양인식의 확대와 해양사", 역사학보, (200), pp.67~97 (2008), 역사학회
- 고동환, "조선후기 船商活動과 浦口間商品流通의 양상-漂流關係記錄을 중심으로-", 韓國文化, 14 (1993)
- 고창석, "19세기 濟州社會硏究" (1997), 일지사
- 김경록, "공민왕대 국제정세와 대외관계의 전개양상", 역사와 현실, (64), pp.197~231 (2007), 한국역사연구회
- 김경록, "명초 홍무제의 군사인식과 군사정책", 군사, (99), pp.145~188 (2016), 국방부군사편찬연구소[DOI]
- 김경록, "麗末鮮初 洪武帝의 高麗․朝鮮 認識과 外交關係", 명청사연구, (35), pp.1~33 (2011), 명청사학회
- 김경록, "洪武年間 明의 封典 整備와 朝·明關係", 중국사연구, (106), pp.59~94 (2017), 중국사학회[DOI]
- 김용곤, "조선전기 조군-조운과 관련하여-", 명지사학, (창간) (1983)
- 김재근, "朝鮮王朝의 水軍", 군사, 1 (1980)
- 나종우, "조선 수군의 무기체계와 전술 구사", 한일관계사연구, 10 (1999)
- 나종우, "조선은 왜 대마도를 정벌했나", 내일을 여는 역사, 10 (2002)
- 남이슬, "康熙年間 淸國人의 海洋犯越과 朝ㆍ淸 양국의 대응", 명청사연구, (44), pp.191~239 (2015), 명청사학회
- 노대환, "조선 후기 서양세력의 접근과 海洋觀의 변화", 한국사연구, (123), pp.11~378 (2003), 한국사연구회
- 민덕기, "동아시아 해금정책의 변화와 해양 경계에서의 분쟁", 한일관계사연구, (42), pp.189~228 (2012), 한일관계사학회
- 이강욱, "고려말 麗․明 관계의 동향과 수군정비", 군사, (90), pp.1~42 (2014), 국방부군사편찬연구소
- 이강욱, "공민왕 21년(1372) 이후 水軍체계의 재검토", 군사, (82), pp.1~40 (2012), 국방부군사편찬연구소
- 이기백, "한국사 시민강좌 1" (1987), 일조각
- 이상태, "대마도 정벌(對馬島征伐)고찰", 군사, 17 (1988)
- 이영, "14세기의 동아시아 국제 정세와 왜구 ―공민왕 15년(1366)의禁倭使節의 파견을 중심으로―", 한일관계사연구, (26), pp.95~146 (2007), 한일관계사학회
- 이영, "동 아시아 국제 질서의 변동과 왜구-14세기 후반에서 15세기 초를 중심으로-", 한일관계사연구, (36), pp.175~230 (2010), 한일관계사학회
- 이영, "洪武帝의 火藥ㆍ火砲 지원과 고려 수군의 재건", 동북아시아문화학회국제학술대회 발표자료집 (2016)
- 이은규, "15世紀初 韓日交涉史 硏究―對馬島征伐을 中心으로―", 역사와 담론, 3 (1974)
- 이재룡, "朝鮮前期의 水軍 : 軍役關係를 中心으로", 한국사연구, 5 (1970)
- 이훈, "임란 이후 ‘회답겸쇄환사’로 본 대일본외교 전략 - 선조대를 중심으로 -", 한일관계사연구, (49), pp.267~309 (2014), 한일관계사학회
- 임영정, "조선전기 해금정책 시행의 배경", 동국사학, 31 (1997)
- 장준혁, "麗末鮮初 동아시아 국제정세 속의 대마도 정벌", 역사와 실학, (53), pp.51~85 (2014), 역사실학회
- 정성일, "漂流記錄을 통해 본 朝鮮後期漁民과 商人의 海上活動-<漂人領來謄錄>과 <漂民被仰上帳>을 중심으로-", 國史館論叢, 99 (2002)
- 조영헌, "明 後期 ‘短命’으로 끝난 漕糧의 海運과 그 의미", 역사교육, (100), pp.259~291 (2006), 역사교육연구회
- 지두환, "세종대 동아시아 정치상황", 한국학연구, (51), pp.85~110 (2014), 한국학연구소
- 최낙민, "明의 海禁政策과 泉州人의 해상활동-嘉靖年間以後 海寇活動을 중심으로-", 역사와경계, (78), pp.103~136 (2011), 부산경남사학회
- 최완기, "신편 한국사 14" (2002), 국사편찬위원회
- 최형국, "조선초기 軍事 戰術체계와 제주 戰馬", 군사, (93), pp.67~103 (2014), 국방부군사편찬연구소
- 한문종, "조선전기 조일간 어업분쟁과 해양권의 강화", 한일관계사연구, (42), pp.115~148 (2012), 한일관계사학회
- 한임선, "조선후기 해양경계(海洋境界)와 해금(海禁)", 동북아 문화연구, 1(21), pp.5~19 (2009), 동북아시아문화학회
- 王賽時, "山東沿海開發史" (2005), 齊魯書社
- 鄭微, "論淸入關前盟誓根源", 邊疆經濟與文化, (97) (2012)
- 肖瑶, "李成梁與晚明遼東政局研究", 博士, pp.2006
- 高橋公明, "朝鮮外交秩序と東アジア海域の交流", 歷史學硏究, 573 (1987)
- 高橋公明, "中世東亞細亞海域에서의 海民과 交流-濟州民을 중심으로-", 탐라문화, 8 (1989)
- 高橋公明, "해역세계 가운데 제주도와 고려", 도서문화, 20 (2002)
- 関周一, "中世日朝海域の硏究" (2002), 吉川弘文館
- 모모키 시로, "해역 아시아사 연구입문" (2012), 민속원
- 北島万次, "豊臣政權の對外認識と朝鮮侵略役" (1990), 校倉書房
- 辻善之助, "豊臣政權の支那朝鮮征伐の原因", 海外交通史話, 190 (1917), 東亞堂書房
- 岸本美緖, "東アジアの'近世'" (1998), 山川出版社
- 岸浩, "長門沿岸に漂着した朝鮮人の送還を巡る諸問題の檢討", 朝鮮學報, 119ㆍ120 (1986)
- 鈴木良一, "秀吉の朝鮮征伐", 歷史學硏究, 155 (1952)
- 田中健夫, "朝鮮の役の分析視覺について", 九州史學, 33ㆍ34 (1966)
- "南滿洲鐵道" (1987), 吉川弘文館
- 池內敏, "18세기 일본 민중의 조선인식", 東方學志, 84 (1994)
- 池內敏, "近世日本と朝鮮漂流民" (1998), 臨川書店
- 津野倫明, "壬辰倭亂の原因ㆍ目的に關する日本の諸學說", 日本學, 28 (2009)
- 근세 동아시아의 표류민 송환체제와 국제관계, in 항해와 표류의 역사, "荒野泰典", 국립제주도박물관, ~ (2003)
- 荒野泰典, "近世日本の漂流民送還体制と東アジア", 歷史評論, 400 (1983)
- 荒野泰典, "近世日本と東アジア" (1988), 東京大出版會