國書와 書契로 본 朝鮮後期(1600-1870) 對日外交
Foreign Relations between Joseon and Japan Seen from State Letters and Sogye in the Late Joseon Period (1600-1870)
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This article analyzes foreign relations documents exchanged between Joseon and Japan. As foreign relations documents, there were the kukso (J. kokusho) and the sogye (J. shokei). State letters were exchanged between the King of Joseon and the Shogun of Japan's Bakufu. The kukso was the most powerful document of the King of Joseon and of the Shogun of Japan that were exchanged between the two rulers. The sogye was the next lowest step for foreign relations. Here, Joseon-Japan relations were examined from three perspectives. First, what kinds of seals were placed on foreign relations documents? Second, how were years and time expressed on foreign relations documents? Third, how was the name of Japan's shogun expressed? As results of the analysis above, Joseon and Japan together entered into foreign relations of “equal relations.” Between Joseon and Japan, as a result of already having established interaction, cooperation and confirmation were established. Both countries believed their country to be superior. Further, both countries set the other country as below their own. But, at the scene of diplomacy between the two countries, the so-called Hwa-i (J. Kai-i) view of the other ruler was difficult to express through written documents.
Abstract
This article analyzes foreign relations documents exchanged between Joseon and Japan. As foreign relations documents, there were the kukso (J. kokusho) and the sogye (J. shokei). State letters were exchanged between the King of Joseon and the Shogun of Japan's Bakufu. The kukso was the most powerful document of the King of Joseon and of the Shogun of Japan that were exchanged between the two rulers. The sogye was the next lowest step for foreign relations. Here, Joseon-Japan relations were examined from three perspectives. First, what kinds of seals were placed on foreign relations documents? Second, how were years and time expressed on foreign relations documents? Third, how was the name of Japan's shogun expressed? As results of the analysis above, Joseon and Japan together entered into foreign relations of “equal relations.” Between Joseon and Japan, as a result of already having established interaction, cooperation and confirmation were established. Both countries believed their country to be superior. Further, both countries set the other country as below their own. But, at the scene of diplomacy between the two countries, the so-called Hwa-i (J. Kai-i) view of the other ruler was difficult to express through written documents.
참고문헌 (57)
- "朝鮮王朝實錄", ~
- "增正交隣志", ~
- "邊例集要", ~
- "通信使謄錄", ~
- 국사편찬위원회, "對馬島宗家關係文書 書契目錄集 Ⅰ" (1991), 利文社
- 국사편찬위원회, "對馬島宗家關係文書 書契目錄集 Ⅱ" (1992), 利文社
- 국사편찬위원회, "對馬島宗家關係文書 書契目錄集 Ⅲ" (1993), 利文社
- 국사편찬위원회, "對馬島宗家關係文書 書契目錄集 Ⅳ" (1993), 利文社
- 국사편찬위원회, "對馬島宗家關係文書 書契目錄集 Ⅴ" (1994), 利文社
- 민덕기, "전근대 동아시아 세계의 韓･日 관계" (2007), 경인문화사
- 민덕기, "도쿠가와 이에야스의 1606년 조선에 보낸 ‘국서’에 대한 위조설 검토 - 요네타니說에 대한 비판을 중심으로 -", 한일관계사연구, (52), pp.91~128 (2015), 한일관계사학회
- 민덕기, "한일수교 50년, 상호 이해와 협력을 위한 역사적 재검토 2" (2017), 경인문화사
- 손승철, "近世韓日外交秘史―國書改作과 韓日外交의 심층 분석" (1988), 강원대학교 출판부
- 유재춘, "조선후기 朝･日 국서 연구", 한일관계사연구, 1 (1993), 한일관계사연구회
- 이효정, "19세기말 조선의 근대 외교질서 수용의 한 양상 – 대일(對日) 사절단의 명칭과 사행원역의 변화를 중심으로 -", 한국학논집, (74), pp.215~254 (2019), 한국학연구원[DOI]
- 이 훈, "조선후기 朝･日 국서 연구", 한일관계사연구, 1 (1986), 한일관계사연구회
- 이 훈, "외교문서로 본 조선과 일본의 의사소통" (2011), 경인문화사
- 장순순, "조선후기 일본의 서계 違式 실태와 조선의 대응", 한일관계사연구, 1 (1993), 한일관계사연구회
- 정성일, "朝･日間 公貿易―書契別幅(1614-1699)의 분석", 사학연구, (58･59) (1999), 한국사학회
- 정성일, "조선통신사 기록물의 ‘UNESCO 세계기록 문화유산’ 등재" (2018), 경인문화사
- 조선통신사문화사업추진위원회, "마음의 교류 조선통신사―에도(江戶)시대로부터 21세기에 보내는 메시지" (2004)
- "通航一覽 第三" (1913), 國書刊行會
- 犬飼俊三, "慶長十一年國書考 1", 文敎の朝鮮, 117 (1935), 朝鮮敎育會
- 犬飼俊三, "慶長十一年國書考 2", 文敎の朝鮮, 118 (1935), 朝鮮敎育會
- 犬飼俊三, "慶長十一年國書考 3", 文敎の朝鮮, 119 (1935), 朝鮮敎育會
- 京都文化博物館, "21世紀記念特別展 こころの交流 朝鮮通信使―江戸時代から21世紀へのメッセージ―", 京都文化博物館･京都新聞社, ~ (2001)
- 京都史蹟會, "羅山先生文集 第一" (1918), 平安考古學會
- 古川祐貴, "国書がむすぶ外交" (2019), 東京大学出版会
- 古川祐貴, "日本―朝鮮･西歐･台湾鄭氏往復外交文書表―16世紀末-19世紀初頭における―", 東京大学史料編纂所研究紀要, 29 (2019), 東京大学史料編纂所
- 九州國立博物館, "開館10周年記念特別展 戰國大名―九州の群雄とアジアの波濤", 九州國立博物館, ~ (2015)
- 九州國立博物館, "文化交流展 特別展示 對馬―遺寶にみる交流の足跡―", 九州國立博物館, ~ (2017)
- 近藤守重, "外蕃通書" (1905), 國書刊行會
- 大塚英明, "藤井齊成會所藏朝鮮通信使關係資料について", 文化財報, 58 (1987)
- 東京國立博物館, "時を越えて語るもの 史料と美術の名宝" (2001), 東京國立博物館･東京大學史料編纂所
- 米谷均, "近世初期日朝關係における外交文書の僞造と改竄", 早稲田大学大学院文學硏究科紀要, (4)통권 : 41 (1995), 早稲田大学大学院文學硏究科
- 米谷均, "文書樣式から見た16世紀の日朝往復書契", 九州史學, 132 (2002), 九州史學硏究會
- 瑞溪周鳳, "善鄰國寶記 新訂續善鄰國寶記", 集英社
- 孫承喆, "近世の朝鮮と日本:交隣關係の虛と實" (1998), 明石書店
- 松方冬子, "国書がむすぶ外交" (2019), 東京大学出版会
- 松浦允任, "朝鮮通交大紀" (1978), 名著出版
- 辛基秀, "善隣と友好の記憶 大系朝鮮通信使 第八卷 辛未･文化度" (1993), 明石書店
- 壬戌･天和度, "善隣と友好の記憶 大系朝鮮通信使 第三卷 乙未･明曆度", pp.1995, 辛基秀
- 丁巳･元和度, "善隣と友好の記憶 大系朝鮮通信使 第一卷 丁未･慶長度", pp.1996, 辛基秀
- 癸未･寬永度, "善隣と友好の記憶 大系朝鮮通信使 第二卷 丙子･寬永度", pp.1996, 辛基秀
- 伊藤幸司, "現存資料からみた日朝外交文書･書契", 九州史學, 132 (2002), 九州史學硏究會
- 以心崇傳, "影印本 異國日記 金地院崇傳外交文書集成" (1989), 東京美術
- 李元植, "朝鮮國書を確認", 外交史料官報, 5 (1992), 일본 外務省外交史料館
- 李元植, "朝鮮通信使の研究" (1997), 思文閣出版
- 長崎歷史文化博物館, "重要文化財指定記念特別展 對馬藩と朝鮮通信使―12万点のが語る歴史の真実", 長崎歷史文化博物館, ~ (2013)
- 田代和生, "書き替えられた国書―徳川･朝鮮外交の舞台裏―』" (1983), 中央公論社
- 田代和生, "日韓歷史公同硏究報告書(第2分科篇)" (2005), 日韓歷史公同硏究委員會
- 田代和生, "朝鮮國書原本の存在と科學分析", 朝鮮學報, 202 (2007), 朝鮮學會
- 田中健夫, "前近代の國際交流と外交文書" (1996), 吉川弘文館
- 池內敏, "大君外交と｢武威｣" (2006), 名古屋大学出版会
- 池內敏, "絶海の碩學―近世日朝外交史硏究" (2019), 名古屋大学出版会
- 下關市立歷史博物館, "ユネスコ｢世界の記憶｣登錄記念特別展』 朝鮮通信使―日韓の平和構築と文化交流の歴史―", 下關市立歷史博物館, ~ (2018)
- 和田浩, "朝鮮國王國書に捺された朱印の科學的分析", MUSEUM 東京國立博物館硏究誌, (608) (2006), 東京國立博物館