본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

17세기 전반 도서제 재개과 운영: 조일관계를 중심으로

Resumption and Operation of the Doseo-System in the First Half of the 17th Century: Focusing on Joseon-Japan Diplomatic Relationship

0

조회

0

다운로드

3

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류학제간연구

초록

In this study, the reality of the operation of the Doseo-system that was resumed with the restoration of diplomatic relations between Joseon and Japan in the first half of the 17th century was reviewed. Joseon agreed with the Tsushima governor’s authority of diplomacy and communication in the relationship with Joseon by permitting the right of issuing Munin and issuing the Doseo to the Tsushima governor according to Giyu Agreement. As the amount of trade between Joseon and Tsushima was reduced compared to the early Joseon Dynasty, Tsushima governor actively requested the Doseo from Joseon to expand the trade. Those who had been issued the Doseo by Joseon had active roles in restoring the diplomatic relationship between the two countries, and Joseon expected friendly cooperation as well as a stable relationship with Japan by permitting the authority to communicate by issuing the Doseo. The operation of the Doseo system in the late Joseon Dynasty maintained the regulations established in the early Joseon period in a broad framework. However, there were big differences because the recipient of the Doseo was limited to the Tsushima governor and Joseon strongly insisted on the operation regulation to Tsushima. As a general rule, Joseon engraved the name of the Doseo recipient on the Doseo, and no one else except the recipient could not use the Doseo. If the Doseo recipient was gone, the successor should return the Doseo and request it with the successor’s name on it. Joseon managed the misuse of the Doseo by checking the names on the Doseo and the recipient of the Diplomatic Documents. Moreover, Joseon enacted a new regulation on the Amyong-Doseo, which was issued to the son of the Tsushima governor. Joseon regarded that Doseo should be used based on the one’s position, and the Amyong-Doseo that was issued before the inauguration of the Tsushima governor should be returned because the Doseo was issued when the new Tsushima governor was inaugurated. However, Tsushima tried to expand the number of the trading ship or to delay the return of Amyong-Doseo until the governor acquired a descendant based on the cases in the early Joseon period. In addition, Tsushima tried to keep the Amyong-Doseo as long as it possible based on the temporal permission from Joseon. Because of the huge difference in interests between Joseon and Tsushima, the negotiation on the Amyong-Doseo was delayed, the Amyong-Doseo was only issued to the son of the Tsushima governor who succeeded to the position in the future, and it should be returned after becoming the governor.

Abstract

In this study, the reality of the operation of the Doseo-system that was resumed with the restoration of diplomatic relations between Joseon and Japan in the first half of the 17th century was reviewed. Joseon agreed with the Tsushima governor’s authority of diplomacy and communication in the relationship with Joseon by permitting the right of issuing Munin and issuing the Doseo to the Tsushima governor according to Giyu Agreement. As the amount of trade between Joseon and Tsushima was reduced compared to the early Joseon Dynasty, Tsushima governor actively requested the Doseo from Joseon to expand the trade. Those who had been issued the Doseo by Joseon had active roles in restoring the diplomatic relationship between the two countries, and Joseon expected friendly cooperation as well as a stable relationship with Japan by permitting the authority to communicate by issuing the Doseo. The operation of the Doseo system in the late Joseon Dynasty maintained the regulations established in the early Joseon period in a broad framework. However, there were big differences because the recipient of the Doseo was limited to the Tsushima governor and Joseon strongly insisted on the operation regulation to Tsushima. As a general rule, Joseon engraved the name of the Doseo recipient on the Doseo, and no one else except the recipient could not use the Doseo. If the Doseo recipient was gone, the successor should return the Doseo and request it with the successor’s name on it. Joseon managed the misuse of the Doseo by checking the names on the Doseo and the recipient of the Diplomatic Documents. Moreover, Joseon enacted a new regulation on the Amyong-Doseo, which was issued to the son of the Tsushima governor. Joseon regarded that Doseo should be used based on the one’s position, and the Amyong-Doseo that was issued before the inauguration of the Tsushima governor should be returned because the Doseo was issued when the new Tsushima governor was inaugurated. However, Tsushima tried to expand the number of the trading ship or to delay the return of Amyong-Doseo until the governor acquired a descendant based on the cases in the early Joseon period. In addition, Tsushima tried to keep the Amyong-Doseo as long as it possible based on the temporal permission from Joseon. Because of the huge difference in interests between Joseon and Tsushima, the negotiation on the Amyong-Doseo was delayed, the Amyong-Doseo was only issued to the son of the Tsushima governor who succeeded to the position in the future, and it should be returned after becoming the governor.

참고문헌 (30)

  1. "조선왕조실록", ~
  2. "비변사등록", ~
  3. "승정원일기", ~
  4. "해행총재", ~
  5. "東萊府接倭狀啓謄錄可考事目錄抄冊", ~
  6. "춘관지", ~
  7. "증정교린지", ~
  8. "변례집요", ~
  9. "재판차왜등록", ~
  10. "동문휘고", ~
  11. "朝鮮通交大紀", ~
  12. "仙巢稿別本", ~
  13. "對馬島宗家文書資料集1" (2005), 국사편찬위원회
  14. 김상준, "근세 한일관계 사료집 야나가와 시게오키 구지기록(柳川調興公事記錄)" (2015), 동북아역사재단
  15. 손승철, "조선시대 한일관계사연구" (1994), 지성의샘
  16. 田代和生, "近世日朝通交貿易史の硏究" (1981), 創文社
  17. 田代和生, "書き替えられた國書" (1983), 中央公論社
  18. 中村榮孝, "『日鮮朝鮮史の硏究』(下)" (1969), 吉川弘文館
  19. 荒野泰典, "近世日本と東アヅア" (1988), 東京大學出版會
  20. 米谷均, "近世前期日朝関係における「図書」の使用実態", 史観, 144, pp.1~15 (2001), 早稲田大学史学会
  21. 山口華代, "對馬に現存する宗氏の圖書二点", pp.313~324 (2014), 中世史料と宗家文庫
  22. 박정슬, "1640년대 아명도서 교섭에 대한 조선과 대마도의 입장", 한일관계사학회 제183회 월례발표회, ~ (2019)
  23. 유채연, "『海行記』를 통해서 본 1734년 문위행", 한일관계사연구, (58), pp.293~330 (2017), 한일관계사학회
  24. 유채연, "조선시대 兒名圖書에 관한 고찰", 한일관계사연구, (62), pp.135~170 (2018), 한일관계사학회[DOI]
  25. 유채연, "17세기 중반 조일관계의 전개와 彦滿圖書 교섭", 전북사학, (59), pp.199~226 (2020), 전북사학회
  26. 유채연, "17세기 후반 조일관계와 右京圖書 교섭", 한일관계사연구, (73), pp.75~112 (2021), 한일관계사학회[DOI]
  27. 韓文鍾, "朝鮮前期 對日外交政策 硏究 : 對馬島와의 關係를 중심으로", 박사, 사학, pp.1996
  28. 한문종, "朝鮮 後期 日本에 관한 著述의 조사 연구 -對日關係 謄錄類를 중심으로", 국사관논총, 86, pp.215~255 (1999), 국사편찬위원회
  29. 洪性德, "十七世紀 朝·日 外交使行 硏究", 박사, 사학, pp.1998
  30. 홍성덕, "조선후기 한일외교체제와 대마도의 역할", 동북아역사논총, (41), pp.137~180 (2013), 동북아역사재단

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (11건)